Literature DB >> 15313084

Public interest in genetic testing for susceptibility to heart disease and cancer: a population-based survey in the UK.

Saskia C Sanderson1, Jane Wardle, Martin J Jarvis, Steve E Humphries.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Given the current concerns about the clinical validity of commercially marketed genetic tests for multifactorial diseases, there is a surprising dearth of information about what public demand might be for genetic tests for any complex diseases other than cancer. The aim of this study was to examine interest in genetic testing for the most common multifactorial disease, heart disease, and to compare it with interest in testing for cancer in a general population sample that had not received detailed information about genetic tests.
METHODS: Interest in genetic testing for heart disease susceptibility was surveyed and compared to interest in genetic testing for cancer susceptibility among a nationally representative sample of 1,960 British adults as part of the Office for National Statistics Omnibus survey.
RESULTS: Sixty-nine percent of respondents expressed interest in being tested for genetic susceptibility to heart disease. Men, people aged 45-60 years, those with less education, and those with a family history were most interested in genetic testing for heart disease. Sixty-four percent of respondents expressed interest in genetic testing for susceptibility to cancer, and gender, age, and education, but not family history, were associated with interest.
CONCLUSIONS: Interest in genetic testing for susceptibility to both heart disease and cancer was high, with the most educated individuals being the least interested in testing. Although the shift toward the 'expert patient' is actively encouraged and consistent with today's health policies, there is considerable and justifiable concern about some of the genetic tests for multifactorial diseases that are currently being marketed directly to the public. The high level of initial interest in the general public found in this study supports the need for a public education program around genetic testing for multifactorial diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15313084     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.04.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  37 in total

1.  Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice Regarding Genetic Testing and Genetic Counselors in Jordan: A Population-Based Survey.

Authors:  Mamoun Ahram; Majd Soubani; Lana Abu Salem; Haneen Saker; Muayyad Ahmad
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Challenges to the translation of genomic information into clinical practice and health policy: Utilization, preferences and economic value.

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips; Su-Ying Liang; Stephanie Van Bebber
Journal:  Curr Opin Mol Ther       Date:  2008-06

3.  Genetic susceptibility testing for chronic disease and intention for behavior change in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Jason L Vassy; Karen Donelan; Marie-France Hivert; Robert C Green; Richard W Grant
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-02-24

4.  Considerations for the impact of personal genome information: a study of genomic profiling among genetics and genomics professionals.

Authors:  Julianne M O'Daniel; Susanne B Haga; Huntington F Willard
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Value of Genetic Testing for Hereditary Colorectal Cancer in a Probability-Based US Online Sample.

Authors:  Sara J Knight; Ateesha F Mohamed; Deborah A Marshall; Uri Ladabaum; Kathryn A Phillips; Judith M E Walsh
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  A Genetic Lung Cancer Susceptibility Test may have a Positive Effect on Smoking Cessation.

Authors:  Tammy Kammin; Andrew K Fenton; Kathryn Thirlaway
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Introducing genetic testing for cardiovascular disease in primary care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jo B Middlemass; Momina F Yazdani; Joe Kai; Penelope J Standen; Nadeem Qureshi
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 8.  Public health genomics and genetic test evaluation: the challenge of conducting behavioural research on the utility of lifestyle-genetic tests.

Authors:  Saskia C Sanderson; Jane Wardle; Steve E Humphries
Journal:  J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics       Date:  2008-08-06

9.  Public attitudes towards genetic testing revisited: comparing opinions between 2002 and 2010.

Authors:  Lidewij Henneman; Eric Vermeulen; Carla G van El; Liesbeth Claassen; Danielle R M Timmermans; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Attitudes of patients with cancer about personalized medicine and somatic genetic testing.

Authors:  Stacy W Gray; Katherine Hicks-Courant; Christopher S Lathan; Levi Garraway; Elyse R Park; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 3.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.