Literature DB >> 22302620

Genetic counseling as a tool for type 2 diabetes prevention: a genetic counseling framework for common polygenetic disorders.

Jessica L Waxler1, Kelsey E O'Brien, Linda M Delahanty, James B Meigs, Jose C Florez, Elyse R Park, Barbara R Pober, Richard W Grant.   

Abstract

Advances in genetic epidemiology have increased understanding of common, polygenic preventable diseases such as type 2 diabetes. As genetic risk testing based on this knowledge moves into clinical practice, we propose that genetic counselors will need to expand their roles and adapt traditional counseling techniques for this new patient set. In this paper, we present a genetic counseling intervention developed for a clinical trial [Genetic Counseling/Lifestyle Change for Diabetes Prevention, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01034319] designed to motivate behavioral changes for diabetes prevention. Seventy-two phenotypically high-risk participants received counseling that included their diabetes genetic risk score, general education about diabetes risk factors, and encouragement to participate in a diabetes prevention program. Using two validated genetic counseling scales, participants reported favorable perceived control and satisfaction with the counseling session. Our intervention represents one model for applying traditional genetic counseling principles to risk testing for polygenetic, preventable diseases, such as type 2 diabetes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22302620      PMCID: PMC3829637          DOI: 10.1007/s10897-012-9486-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  31 in total

1.  The prospect of genome-guided preventive medicine: a need and opportunity for genetic counselors.

Authors:  Julianne M O'Daniel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Re-conceptualizing risk in genetic counseling: implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Jehannine C Austin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  How risk is perceived, constructed and interpreted by clients in clinical genetics, and the effects on decision making: systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie Sivell; Glyn Elwyn; Clara L Gaff; Angus J Clarke; Rachel Iredale; Chris Shaw; Joanna Dundon; Hazel Thornton; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  The perceived personal control (PPC) questionnaire as an outcome of genetic counseling: reliability and validity of the instrument.

Authors:  Ellen M A Smets; Arwen H Pieterse; Cora M Aalfs; Margreet G E M Ausems; Alexandra M van Dulmen
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 5.  Motivational interviewing.

Authors:  Jennifer Hettema; Julie Steele; William R Miller
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 18.561

6.  Considerations for the impact of personal genome information: a study of genomic profiling among genetics and genomics professionals.

Authors:  Julianne M O'Daniel; Susanne B Haga; Huntington F Willard
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  BRCA1 Testing: Genetic Counseling Protocol Development and Counseling Issues.

Authors:  B J Baty; V L Venne; J McDonald; R T Croyle; C Halls; J E Nash; J R Botkin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  "Talking About Chance": The Presentation of Risk Information During Genetic Counseling for Breast and Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  N Hallowell; H Statham; F Murton; J Green; M Richards
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Patient satisfaction with cancer genetic counseling: a psychometric analysis of the Genetic Counseling Satisfaction Scale.

Authors:  Tiffani A DeMarco; Beth N Peshkin; Bryn D Mars; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Perceived impact of diabetes genetic risk testing among patients at high phenotypic risk for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Sarah M Markowitz; Elyse R Park; Linda M Delahanty; Kelsey E O'Brien; Richard W Grant
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  17 in total

1.  Genomic counseling: next generation counseling.

Authors:  Rachel Mills; Susanne B Haga
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Are Australasian Genetic Counselors Interested in Private Practice at the Primary Care Level of Health Service?

Authors:  Vrunda Sane; Linda Humphreys; Madelyn Peterson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  The impact of participation in genetic research for families with cleft lip with and without cleft palate: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Lynley J Donoghue; Margaret A Sahhar; Ravi Savarirayan; Supriya Raj; Nicky M Kilpatrick; Laura E Forrest
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2014-02-06

4.  Making Sense of SNPs: Women's Understanding and Experiences of Receiving a Personalized Profile of Their Breast Cancer Risks.

Authors:  Mary-Anne Young; Laura Elenor Forrest; Victoria-Mae Rasmussen; Paul James; Gillian Mitchell; Sarah Dilys Sawyer; Katrina Reeve; Nina Hallowell
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Discussing race-related limitations of genomic testing for colon cancer risk: implications for education and counseling.

Authors:  Morgan N Butrick; Lauren Vanhusen; Kara-Grace Leventhal; Gillian W Hooker; Rachel Nusbaum; Beth N Peshkin; Yasmin Salehizadeh; Jessica Pavlick; Marc D Schwartz; Kristi D Graves
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Motivation, Perception, and Treatment Beliefs in the Myocardial Infarction Genes (MI-GENES) Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Sharma Kattel; Tochukwu Onyekwelu; Sherry-Ann Brown; Hayan Jouni; Erin Austin; Iftikhar J Kullo
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  A Qualitative Study of Anticipated Decision Making around Type 2 Diabetes Genetic Testing: the Role of Scientifically Concordant and Discordant Expectations.

Authors:  Alicia G Carmichael; Bailey B Hulswit; Emily J Moe; Toby Epstein Jayaratne; Beverly M Yashar
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Genetic Testing and Type 2 Diabetes Risk Awareness.

Authors:  Mary de Groot; Jennifer Wessel
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.140

9.  Personalized genetic risk counseling to motivate diabetes prevention: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Richard W Grant; Kelsey E O'Brien; Jessica L Waxler; Jason L Vassy; Linda M Delahanty; Laurie G Bissett; Robert C Green; Katherine G Stember; Candace Guiducci; Elyse R Park; Jose C Florez; James B Meigs
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Estimation of newborn risk for child or adolescent obesity: lessons from longitudinal birth cohorts.

Authors:  Anita Morandi; David Meyre; Stéphane Lobbens; Ken Kleinman; Marika Kaakinen; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Vincent Vatin; Stefan Gaget; Anneli Pouta; Anna-Liisa Hartikainen; Jaana Laitinen; Aimo Ruokonen; Shikta Das; Anokhi Ali Khan; Paul Elliott; Claudio Maffeis; Matthew W Gillman; Marjo-Riitta Järvelin; Philippe Froguel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.