Literature DB >> 20333768

New generation IQ-200 automated urine microscopy analyzer compared with KOVA cell chamber.

Emel Altekin1, Ozgur Kadiçesme, Pinar Akan, Tuncay Kume, Ozgul Vupa, Gul Ergor, Hakan Abacioglu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The examination of the urine remains to be one of the most commonly performed tests in laboratory practice. Currently, laboratories also need to accredit their urine diagnostics by comparing their measurement methods to acceptable references. In this study we compared particle counts obtained by new generation automated technique, image capture analysis (IQ-200) with those of a standardized chamber counts. DESIGN AND METHODS: The same 258 urine samples from different departments of a hospital assayed by IQ-200 were analyzed in parallel with the KOVA cell chamber system. Clinically significant discrepancy results (positive vs. negative) for red blood cell (RBC) and white blood cell (WBC) were also compared with those obtained by dipstick testing.
RESULTS: There was a good agreement between the automated system and sediment microscopy for RBCs, WBCs, and squamous epithelial cells (SCs) (r=0.90; r=0.80; r=0.72, respectively: P<0.001). The IQ-200 was more sensitive for determining RBCs, WBCs, and SCs than other formed elements.
CONCLUSIONS: IQ-200 can perform accurate quantification of microscopic element in urine. However, automated techniques are not completely free of error. Therefore, by adopting an appropriate algorithm and combining the results with stript analysis and other laboratory tests allows further reduction of clinically important errors. Copyright 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20333768      PMCID: PMC6647716          DOI: 10.1002/jcla.20319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal        ISSN: 0887-8013            Impact factor:   2.352


  13 in total

1.  Automation of urine sediment examination: a comparison of the Sysmex UF-100 automated flow cytometer with routine manual diagnosis (microscopy, test strips, and bacterial culture).

Authors:  K Hannemann-Pohl; S C Kampf
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 2.  The role of automated urine particle flow cytometry in clinical practice.

Authors:  J R Delanghe; T T Kouri; A R Huber; K Hannemann-Pohl; W G Guder; A Lun; P Sinha; G Stamminger; L Beier
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.786

3.  Analytic performance of the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer and comparison with manual counts using Fuchs-Rosenthal cell chambers.

Authors:  David T Wah; Porntip K Wises; Anthony W Butch
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Preliminary evaluation of the Iris IQ 200 automated urine analyser.

Authors:  Lia Alves; Frederic Ballester; Jordi Camps; Jorge Joven
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Urine sediment examination: a comparison between the manual method and the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer.

Authors:  Pornvaree Lamchiagdhase; Krisana Preechaborisutkul; Pitimon Lomsomboon; Pimpawee Srisuchart; Pornsri Tantiniti; Nongnute Khan-u-Ra; Boonsong Preechaborisutkul
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.786

6.  Evaluation of Sysmex UF-100 urine flow cytometer vs chamber counting of supravitally stained specimens and conventional bacterial cultures.

Authors:  T T Kouri; U Kähkönen; K Malminiemi; R Vuento; R M Rowan
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.493

7.  Comparison of automated and manual methods for urinalysis.

Authors:  R J Elin; J M Hosseini; J Kestner; M Rawe; M Ruddel; H H Nishi
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 2.493

8.  Evaluation of the Yellow IRIS. An automated method for urinalysis.

Authors:  C E Roe; D A Carlson; R W Daigneault; B E Statland
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 2.493

9.  Urine sediment analysis by the Yellow IRIS automated urinalysis workstation.

Authors:  E S Wargotz; J E Hyde; D S Karcher; J P Hitlan; D S Wilkinson
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.493

10.  "The Yellow IRIS" urinalysis workstation--the first commercial application of "automated intelligent microscopy".

Authors:  F H Deindoerfer; J R Gangwer; C W Laird; R R Ringold
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 8.327

View more
  7 in total

1.  Comparison of the Automated cobas u 701 Urine Microscopy and UF-1000i Flow Cytometry Systems and Manual Microscopy in the Examination of Urine Sediments.

Authors:  Wonmok Lee; Jung-Sook Ha; Nam-Hee Ryoo
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  UriSed 3 and UX-2000 automated urine sediment analyzers vs manual microscopic method: A comparative performance analysis.

Authors:  Sathima Laiwejpithaya; Preechaya Wongkrajang; Kanit Reesukumal; Chonticha Bucha; Suriya Meepanya; Chanutchaya Pattanavin; Varanya Khejonnit; Achara Chuntarut
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  Comparison of fully automated urine sediment analyzers H800-FUS100 and LabUMat-UriSed with manual microscopy.

Authors:  Hatice Yüksel; Elif Kiliç; Aysun Ekinci; Osman Evliyaoğlu
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Comparison of Cobas 6500 and Iris IQ200 fully-automated urine analyzers to manual urine microscopy.

Authors:  Ebubekir Bakan; Nurinnisa Ozturk; Nurcan Kilic Baygutalp; Elif Polat; Kadriye Akpinar; Emrullah Dorman; Harun Polat; Nuri Bakan
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 2.313

5.  Evaluation of the analytical performances of Cobas 6500 and Sysmex UN series automated urinalysis systems with manual microscopic particle counting.

Authors:  Ebubekir Bakan; Zafer Bayraktutan; Nurcan Kilic Baygutalp; Mehmet Ali Gul; Fatma Zuhal Umudum; Nuri Bakan
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

6.  Automated urinalysis combining physicochemical analysis, on-board centrifugation, and digital imaging in one system: A multicenter performance evaluation of the cobas 6500 urine work area.

Authors:  Christa M Cobbaert; Figen Arslan; Imma Caballé Martín; Antoni Alsius Serra; Ester Picó-Plana; Víctor Sánchez-Margalet; Antonio Carmona-Fernández; John Burden; André Ziegler; Walter Bechel
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2019-09-19

7.  The comparison of automated urine analyzers with manual microscopic examination for urinalysis automated urine analyzers and manual urinalysis.

Authors:  Fatma Demet İnce; Hamit Yaşar Ellidağ; Mehmet Koseoğlu; Neşe Şimşek; Hülya Yalçın; Mustafa Osman Zengin
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2016-03-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.