Literature DB >> 10510734

Automation of urine sediment examination: a comparison of the Sysmex UF-100 automated flow cytometer with routine manual diagnosis (microscopy, test strips, and bacterial culture).

K Hannemann-Pohl1, S C Kampf.   

Abstract

Urine specimens from 438 patients were examined with the UF-100 flow cytometer (Sysmex TOA Medical Electronics (Europe) GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) and by manual microscopy and test strips. One hundred and forty-two of these were also examined bacteriologically. The measurements with the UF-100 were performed on native urine without prior centrifugation. Intraassay imprecision, CV of 1.3% (547/microliter) to 8.5% (24/microliter) for erythrocytes and CV of 2.4% (218/microliter) to 5.6% (10/microliter) for leukocytes, are similar to those usual in clinical chemistry, and are very much better than those seen in manual microscopy of sediment. In routine use, overloading the flow cytometer by an excessive concentration of particles was observed in 9% of specimens. Such specimens should be checked visually. The UF-100 is distinctly more sensitive than manual microscopy for determining leukocytes, erythrocytes, epithelial cells and bacteria. Reference ranges were estimated from the results obtained. These enabled the UF-100 to replace routine manual diagnostic methods. Although the sensitivity is improved over manual microscopy of sediment, it is always necessary to perform parallel test strip examination when determining erythrocytes in order to detect haemolysis. In our opinion the Sysmex UF-100 is a suitable replacement for manual microscopy of urine sediment. In addition it offers an opportunity to improve standardization of basic urinalysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10510734     DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.1999.116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  17 in total

1.  Determination of cut-off values for leucocytes and bacteria for urine flow cytometer (UF-100) in urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Tulay Koken; Orhan C Aktepe; Mustafa Serteser; Murat Samli; Ahmet Kahraman; Nurhan Dogan
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  New generation IQ-200 automated urine microscopy analyzer compared with KOVA cell chamber.

Authors:  Emel Altekin; Ozgur Kadiçesme; Pinar Akan; Tuncay Kume; Ozgul Vupa; Gul Ergor; Hakan Abacioglu
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  Clinical laboratory automated urinalysis: comparison among automated microscopy, flow cytometry, two test strips analyzers, and manual microscopic examination of the urine sediments.

Authors:  S Mayo; D Acevedo; C Quiñones-Torrelo; I Canós; M Sancho
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Screening of urine samples by flow cytometry reduces the need for culture.

Authors:  Santra Jolkkonen; Eeva-Liisa Paattiniemi; Pauliina Kärpänoja; Hannu Sarkkinen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of fully automated urine sediment analyzers H800-FUS100 and LabUMat-UriSed with manual microscopy.

Authors:  Hatice Yüksel; Elif Kiliç; Aysun Ekinci; Osman Evliyaoğlu
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.352

6.  Electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids in urine.

Authors:  Y M Fazil Marickar
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2009-11-17

7.  Interobserver reliability of urine sediment interpretation.

Authors:  Ron Wald; Chaim M Bell; Rosane Nisenbaum; Samuel Perrone; Orfeas Liangos; Andreas Laupacis; Bertrand L Jaber
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Accuracy of Automated Flow Cytometry-Based Leukocyte Counts To Rule Out Urinary Tract Infection in Febrile Children: a Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Hong Phuoc Duong; Karl Martin Wissing; Nathalie Tram; Georges Mascart; Philippe Lepage; Khalid Ismaili
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Comparison of Cobas 6500 and Iris IQ200 fully-automated urine analyzers to manual urine microscopy.

Authors:  Ebubekir Bakan; Nurinnisa Ozturk; Nurcan Kilic Baygutalp; Elif Polat; Kadriye Akpinar; Emrullah Dorman; Harun Polat; Nuri Bakan
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 2.313

Review 10.  Preanalytical requirements of urinalysis.

Authors:  Joris Delanghe; Marijn Speeckaert
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 2.313

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.