Literature DB >> 16018883

Urine sediment examination: a comparison between the manual method and the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer.

Pornvaree Lamchiagdhase1, Krisana Preechaborisutkul, Pitimon Lomsomboon, Pimpawee Srisuchart, Pornsri Tantiniti, Nongnute Khan-u-Ra, Boonsong Preechaborisutkul.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Microscopic examination of the urine sediment is an essential part in the evaluation of renal and urinary tract diseases. Traditionally, manual microscopic techniques have several methodological steps that may contribute to imprecision, inaccuracy, and are time-consuming. Recently, the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer has been introduced to analyze the unspun urine, thereby improving accuracy, precision and throughput.
METHODS: In this study, we compared its performance with manual routine slide and chamber counts. Fresh urine samples were obtained from 400 subjects.
RESULTS: The reference values of white blood cells, red blood cells and squamous epithelial cells obtained by the above methods were not significant difference when the results reported as cells per high-power field. For the specimens of patients (n=280), a significant correlation was found when the iQ200 results of cellular elements were compared with those obtained from manual microscopy. No significant difference was found when the post-review results of the iQ200 were compared with the chamber count. However, the presence of casts, crystals, bacteria, and budding yeast needs further characterization under the microscope.
CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial agreement between the iQ200 and manual microscopic methods. The iQ200 provides for a rapid turnaround time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16018883     DOI: 10.1016/j.cccn.2005.02.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chim Acta        ISSN: 0009-8981            Impact factor:   3.786


  13 in total

1.  New generation IQ-200 automated urine microscopy analyzer compared with KOVA cell chamber.

Authors:  Emel Altekin; Ozgur Kadiçesme; Pinar Akan; Tuncay Kume; Ozgul Vupa; Gul Ergor; Hakan Abacioglu
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Performance Evaluation of Three URiSCAN Devices for Routine Urinalysis.

Authors:  Kiwoong Ko; Min-Jung Kwon; Seungho Ryu; Hee-Yeon Woo; Hyosoon Park
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  Comparison of the Automated cobas u 701 Urine Microscopy and UF-1000i Flow Cytometry Systems and Manual Microscopy in the Examination of Urine Sediments.

Authors:  Wonmok Lee; Jung-Sook Ha; Nam-Hee Ryoo
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Clinical laboratory automated urinalysis: comparison among automated microscopy, flow cytometry, two test strips analyzers, and manual microscopic examination of the urine sediments.

Authors:  S Mayo; D Acevedo; C Quiñones-Torrelo; I Canós; M Sancho
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.352

5.  UriSed 3 and UX-2000 automated urine sediment analyzers vs manual microscopic method: A comparative performance analysis.

Authors:  Sathima Laiwejpithaya; Preechaya Wongkrajang; Kanit Reesukumal; Chonticha Bucha; Suriya Meepanya; Chanutchaya Pattanavin; Varanya Khejonnit; Achara Chuntarut
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 2.352

6.  A new method based on Adaptive Discrete Wavelet Entropy Energy and Neural Network Classifier (ADWEENN) for recognition of urine cells from microscopic images independent of rotation and scaling.

Authors:  Derya Avci; Mehmet Kemal Leblebicioglu; Mustafa Poyraz; Esin Dogantekin
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Interobserver reliability of urine sediment interpretation.

Authors:  Ron Wald; Chaim M Bell; Rosane Nisenbaum; Samuel Perrone; Orfeas Liangos; Andreas Laupacis; Bertrand L Jaber
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  High False Positives and False Negatives in Yeast Parameter in an Automated Urine Sediment Analyzer.

Authors:  Ozgur Aydin; Hamit Yasar Ellidag; Esin Eren; Necat Yilmaz
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Comparison of Cobas 6500 and Iris IQ200 fully-automated urine analyzers to manual urine microscopy.

Authors:  Ebubekir Bakan; Nurinnisa Ozturk; Nurcan Kilic Baygutalp; Elif Polat; Kadriye Akpinar; Emrullah Dorman; Harun Polat; Nuri Bakan
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 2.313

10.  The comparison of automated urine analyzers with manual microscopic examination for urinalysis automated urine analyzers and manual urinalysis.

Authors:  Fatma Demet İnce; Hamit Yaşar Ellidağ; Mehmet Koseoğlu; Neşe Şimşek; Hülya Yalçın; Mustafa Osman Zengin
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2016-03-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.