Literature DB >> 20237025

Image-quality assessment for several positron emitters using the NEMA NU 4-2008 standards in the Siemens Inveon small-animal PET scanner.

Jonathan A Disselhorst1, Maarten Brom, Peter Laverman, Cornelius H Slump, Otto C Boerman, Wim J G Oyen, Martin Gotthardt, Eric P Visser.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The positron emitters (18)F, (68)Ga, (124)I, and (89)Zr are all relevant in small-animal PET. Each of these radionuclides has different positron energies and ranges and a different fraction of single photons emitted. Average positron ranges larger than the intrinsic spatial resolution of the scanner (for (124)I and (68)Ga) will deteriorate the effective spatial resolution and activity recovery coefficient (RC) for small lesions or phantom structures. The presence of single photons (for (124)I and (89)Zr) could increase image noise and spillover ratios (SORs).
METHODS: Image noise, expressed as percentage SD in a uniform region (%SD), RC, and SOR (in air and water) were determined using the NEMA NU 4 small-animal image-quality phantom filled with 3.7 MBq of total activity of (18)F, (68)Ga, (124)I, or (89)Zr. Filtered backprojection (FBP), ordered-subset expectation maximization in 2 dimensions, and maximum a posteriori (MAP) reconstructions were compared. In addition to the NEMA NU 4 image-quality parameters, spatial resolutions were determined using small glass capillaries filled with these radionuclides in a water environment.
RESULTS: The %SD for (18)F, (68)Ga, (124)I, and (89)Zr using FBP was 6.27, 6.40, 6.74, and 5.83, respectively. The respective RCs were 0.21, 0.11, 0.12, and 0.19 for the 1-mm-diameter rod and 0.97, 0.65, 0.64, and 0.88 for the 5-mm-diameter rod. SORs in air were 0.01, 0.03, 0.04, and 0.01, respectively, and in water 0.02, 0.10, 0.13, and 0.02. Other reconstruction algorithms gave similar differences between the radionuclides. MAP produced the highest RCs. For the glass capillaries using FBP, the full widths at half maximum for (18)F, (68)Ga, (124)I, and (89)Zr were 1.81, 2.46, 2.38, and 1.99 mm, respectively. The corresponding full widths at tenth maximum were 3.57, 6.52, 5.87, and 4.01 mm.
CONCLUSION: With the intrinsic spatial resolution (approximately 1.5 mm) of this latest-generation small-animal PET scanner, the finite positron range has become the limiting factor for the overall spatial resolution and activity recovery in small structures imaged with (124)I and (68)Ga. The presence of single photons had only a limited effect on the image noise. MAP, as compared with the other reconstruction algorithms, increased RC and decreased %SD and SOR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20237025     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.109.068858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  51 in total

1.  Quantitative, simultaneous PET/MRI for intratumoral imaging with an MRI-compatible PET scanner.

Authors:  Thomas S C Ng; James R Bading; Ryan Park; Hargun Sohi; Daniel Procissi; David Colcher; Peter S Conti; Simon R Cherry; Andrew A Raubitschek; Russell E Jacobs
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Performance characterization of the Inveon preclinical small-animal PET/SPECT/CT system for multimodality imaging.

Authors:  Keiichi Magota; Naoki Kubo; Yuji Kuge; Ken-Ichi Nishijima; Songji Zhao; Nagara Tamaki
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Reproducibility of static and dynamic (18)F-FDG, (18)F-FLT, and (18)F-FMISO MicroPET studies in a murine model of HER2+ breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer G Whisenant; Todd E Peterson; Jacob U Fluckiger; Mohammed Noor Tantawy; Gregory D Ayers; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Image quality of Zr-89 PET imaging in the Siemens microPET Focus 220 preclinical scanner.

Authors:  Tyler J Bradshaw; Martin J Voorbach; David R Reuter; Anthony M Giamis; Sarah R Mudd; John D Beaver
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Small-animal imaging using clinical positron emission tomography/computed tomography and super-resolution.

Authors:  Frank P DiFilippo; Sagar Patel; Kewal Asosingh; Serpil C Erzurum
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.488

6.  Spatial resolution and image qualities of Zr-89 on Siemens Biograph TruePoint PET/CT.

Authors:  Young Sub Lee; Jin Su Kim; Jung Young Kim; Byung Il Kim; Sang Moo Lim; Hee-Joung Kim
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 3.099

Review 7.  Quantitative Rodent Brain Receptor Imaging.

Authors:  Kristina Herfert; Julia G Mannheim; Laura Kuebler; Sabina Marciano; Mario Amend; Christoph Parl; Hanna Napieczynska; Florian M Maier; Salvador Castaneda Vega; Bernd J Pichler
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Investigation of Image Reconstruction Parameters of the Mediso nanoScan PC Small-Animal PET/CT Scanner for Two Different Positron Emitters Under NEMA NU 4-2008 Standards.

Authors:  Anastasios Gaitanis; George A Kastis; Elena Vlastou; Penelope Bouziotis; Panayotis Verginis; Constantinos D Anagnostopoulos
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Insights into bone metabolism of avian embryos in ovo via 3D and 4D 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Lydia Würbach; Alexander Heidrich; Thomas Opfermann; Peter Gebhardt; Hans Peter Saluz
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 10.  New frontiers in the design and synthesis of imaging probes for PET oncology: current challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Graham Smith; Laurence Carroll; Eric O Aboagye
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.