Literature DB >> 22422564

Insights into bone metabolism of avian embryos in ovo via 3D and 4D 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography.

Lydia Würbach1, Alexander Heidrich, Thomas Opfermann, Peter Gebhardt, Hans Peter Saluz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The chick embryo is a well-known economical in vivo model system and is widely applied in preclinical research, e.g., bone development studies. It is therefore surprising that no studies concerning the application of (18)F-fluoride microPET to bone metabolism have been reported so far. This may be due to motion artifacts or the lack of convenient tracer injection sites.
METHODS: We resolved the above problems using a combination of sample preparation, anesthesia, microPET imaging, and computational processing, and describe a convenient way of visualizing three- and four- dimensional features of bone metabolism in living chick embryos.
RESULTS: The application of (18)F-fluoride microPET facilitates repeat measurements, highly reproducible and motion-artifact-free skeletal imaging, and provides quantitative measurements of in ovo metabolic activities in the bones of developing chick. During microPET measurement, radio tracer was injected intravascularly using a custom-made catheter system, allowing us to additionally investigate early time points in tracer kinetics and uptake.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that bone metabolism in living chick embryos can be reproducibly studied and quantified in ovo, even for multiple tracer injections over a longer time period. The use of dynamic (18)F-fluoride microPET imaging made it possible to visualize and analyze even small bone structures with excellent quality. Moreover, as our data are comparable to data from corresponding rodent experiments, the use of embryonated chicken eggs is a convenient and economical alternative to other animal models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22422564     DOI: 10.1007/s11307-012-0550-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol        ISSN: 1536-1632            Impact factor:   3.488


  42 in total

1.  The chick embryo as a model system for analyzing mechanisms of development.

Authors:  D K Darnell; G C Schoenwolf
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2000

Review 2.  Small animal imaging. current technology and perspectives for oncological imaging.

Authors:  Jason S Lewis; S Achilefu; J R Garbow; R Laforest; M J Welch
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 3.  Molecular mechanisms of bone 18F-NaF deposition.

Authors:  Johannes Czernin; Nagichettiar Satyamurthy; Christiaan Schiepers
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Noninvasive monitoring of chick development in ovo using a 7T MRI system from day 12 of incubation through to hatching.

Authors:  Maureen M Bain; Andrew J Fagan; James M Mullin; Iain McNaught; John McLean; Barrie Condon
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  In vivo imaging of mineral deposition in carotid plaque using 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT: correlation with atherogenic risk factors.

Authors:  Thorsten Derlin; Christian Wisotzki; Ulrich Richter; Ivayla Apostolova; Peter Bannas; Christoph Weber; Janos Mester; Susanne Klutmann
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Whole-body skeletal imaging in mice utilizing microPET: optimization of reproducibility and applications in animal models of bone disease.

Authors:  Frank Berger; Yu-Po Lee; Andreas M Loening; Arion Chatziioannou; Stephen J Freedland; Richard Leahy; Jay R Lieberman; Arie S Belldegrun; Charles L Sawyers; Sanjiv S Gambhir
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo.

Authors:  V HAMBURGER; H L HAMILTON
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1951-01       Impact factor: 1.804

8.  Measurement of blood pressure of chick embryo with an implanted needle catheter.

Authors:  H Tazawa
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1981-10

9.  Differences in regional bone perfusion and turnover between lumbar spine and distal humerus: (18)F-fluoride PET study of treatment-naïve and treated postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Michelle L Frost; Glen M Blake; Gary J R Cook; Paul K Marsden; Ignac Fogelman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Production of human monoclonal antibody in eggs of chimeric chickens.

Authors:  Lei Zhu; Marie-Cecile van de Lavoir; Jenny Albanese; David O Beenhouwer; Pina M Cardarelli; Severino Cuison; David F Deng; Shrikant Deshpande; Jennifer H Diamond; Lynae Green; Edward L Halk; Babette S Heyer; Robert M Kay; Allyn Kerchner; Philip A Leighton; Christine M Mather; Sherie L Morrison; Zivko L Nikolov; David B Passmore; Alicia Pradas-Monne; Benjamin T Preston; Vangipuram S Rangan; Mingxia Shi; Mohan Srinivasan; Steven G White; Peggy Winters-Digiacinto; Susan Wong; Wen Zhou; Robert J Etches
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2005-08-28       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  5 in total

1.  Automated Segmentation and Object Classification of CT Images: Application to In Vivo Molecular Imaging of Avian Embryos.

Authors:  Alexander Heidrich; Jana Schmidt; Johannes Zimmermann; Hans Peter Saluz
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2013-08-12

2.  Multi-Modal PET and MR Imaging in the Hen's Egg Test-Chorioallantoic Membrane (HET-CAM) Model for Initial in Vivo Testing of Target-Specific Radioligands.

Authors:  Gordon Winter; Andrea B F Koch; Jessica Löffler; Mika Lindén; Christoph Solbach; Alireza Abaei; Hao Li; Gerhard Glatting; Ambros J Beer; Volker Rasche
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 3.  Experimental Nuclear Medicine Meets Tumor Biology.

Authors:  Theresa Balber; Loan Tran; Katarína Benčurová; Julia Raitanen; Gerda Egger; Markus Mitterhauser
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-14

4.  Blocking Studies to Evaluate Receptor-Specific Radioligand Binding in the CAM Model by PET and MR Imaging.

Authors:  Jessica Löffler; Hendrik Herrmann; Ellen Scheidhauer; Mareike Wirth; Anne Wasserloos; Christoph Solbach; Gerhard Glatting; Ambros J Beer; Volker Rasche; Gordon Winter
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 6.575

5.  Comparison of medetomidine, thiopental and ketamine/midazolam anesthesia in chick embryos for in ovo Magnetic Resonance Imaging free of motion artifacts.

Authors:  Conny Waschkies; Flora Nicholls; Johanna Buschmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.