Literature DB >> 22661534

Quantitative, simultaneous PET/MRI for intratumoral imaging with an MRI-compatible PET scanner.

Thomas S C Ng1, James R Bading, Ryan Park, Hargun Sohi, Daniel Procissi, David Colcher, Peter S Conti, Simon R Cherry, Andrew A Raubitschek, Russell E Jacobs.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Noninvasive methods are needed to explore the heterogeneous tumor microenvironment and its modulation by therapy. Hybrid PET/MRI systems are being developed for small-animal and clinical use. The advantage of these integrated systems depends on their ability to provide MR images that are spatially coincident with simultaneously acquired PET images, allowing combined functional MRI and PET studies of intratissue heterogeneity. Although much effort has been devoted to developing this new technology, the issue of quantitative and spatial fidelity of PET images from hybrid PET/MRI systems to the tissues imaged has received little attention. Here, we evaluated the ability of a first-generation, small-animal MRI-compatible PET scanner to accurately depict heterogeneous patterns of radiotracer uptake in tumors.
METHODS: Quantitative imaging characteristics of the MRI-compatible PET (PET/MRI) scanner were evaluated with phantoms using calibration coefficients derived from a mouse-sized linearity phantom. PET performance was compared with a commercial small-animal PET system and autoradiography in tumor-bearing mice. Pixel and structure-based similarity metrics were used to evaluate image concordance among modalities. Feasibility of simultaneous PET/MRI functional imaging of tumors was explored by following (64)Cu-labeled antibody uptake in relation to diffusion MRI using cooccurrence matrix analysis.
RESULTS: The PET/MRI scanner showed stable and linear response. Activity concentration recovery values (measured and true activity concentration) calculated for 4-mm-diameter rods within linearity and uniform activity rod phantoms were near unity (0.97 ± 0.06 and 1.03 ± 0.03, respectively). Intratumoral uptake patterns for both (18)F-FDG and a (64)Cu-antibody acquired using the PET/MRI scanner and small-animal PET were highly correlated with autoradiography (r > 0.99) and with each other (r = 0.97 ± 0.01). On the basis of these data, we performed a preliminary study comparing diffusion MRI and radiolabeled antibody uptake patterns over time and visualized movement of antibodies from the vascular space into the tumor mass.
CONCLUSION: The MRI-compatible PET scanner provided tumor images that were quantitatively accurate and spatially concordant with autoradiography and the small-animal PET examination. Cooccurrence matrix approaches enabled effective analysis of multimodal image sets. These observations confirm the ability of the current simultaneous PET/MRI system to provide accurate observations of intratumoral function and serve as a benchmark for future evaluations of hybrid instrumentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22661534      PMCID: PMC3552656          DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.111.099861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  25 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative whole-body autoradiography.

Authors:  R A Coe
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  Phenotyping of tumor biology in patients by multimodality multiparametric imaging: relationship of microcirculation, alphavbeta3 expression, and glucose metabolism.

Authors:  Stephan Metz; Carl Ganter; Sylvie Lorenzen; Sandra van Marwick; Ken Herrmann; Florian Lordick; Stephan G Nekolla; Ernst J Rummeny; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Gunnar Brix; Markus Schwaiger; Ambros J Beer
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  PET Performance Evaluation of an MR-Compatible PET Insert.

Authors:  Yibao Wu; Ciprian Catana; Richard Farrell; Purushottam A Dokhale; Kanai S Shah; Jinyi Qi; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 1.679

4.  Simultaneous acquisition of multislice PET and MR images: initial results with a MR-compatible PET scanner.

Authors:  Ciprian Catana; Yibao Wu; Martin S Judenhofer; Jinyi Qi; Bernd J Pichler; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Complex wavelet structural similarity: a new image similarity index.

Authors:  Mehul P Sampat; Zhou Wang; Shalini Gupta; Alan Conrad Bovik; Mia K Markey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 10.856

6.  A versatile bifunctional chelate for radiolabeling humanized anti-CEA antibody with In-111 and Cu-64 at either thiol or amino groups: PET imaging of CEA-positive tumors with whole antibodies.

Authors:  Lin Li; James Bading; Paul J Yazaki; Amitkumar H Ahuja; Desiree Crow; David Colcher; Lawrence E Williams; Jeffrey Y C Wong; Andrew Raubitschek; John E Shively
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 4.774

Review 7.  Imaging in the era of molecular oncology.

Authors:  Ralph Weissleder; Mikael J Pittet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Functional tumor imaging with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Peter L Choyke; Andrew J Dwyer; Michael V Knopp
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Optimization and performance evaluation of the microPET II scanner for in vivo small-animal imaging.

Authors:  Yongfeng Yang; Yuan-Chuan Tai; Stefan Siegel; Danny F Newport; Bing Bai; Quanzheng Li; Richard M Leahy; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-06-21       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Noninvasive multimodality imaging of the tumor microenvironment: registered dynamic magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography studies of a preclinical tumor model of tumor hypoxia.

Authors:  HyungJoon Cho; Ellen Ackerstaff; Sean Carlin; Mihaela E Lupu; Ya Wang; Asif Rizwan; Joseph O'Donoghue; C Clifton Ling; John L Humm; Pat B Zanzonico; Jason A Koutcher
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.715

View more
  9 in total

1.  In vivo pentamodal tomographic imaging for small animals.

Authors:  Muhan Liu; Hongbo Guo; Hongbo Liu; Zeyu Zhang; Chongwei Chi; Hui Hui; Di Dong; Zhenhua Hu; Jie Tian
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 2.  A physiological perspective on the use of imaging to assess the in vivo delivery of therapeutics.

Authors:  Shengping Qin; Brett Z Fite; M Karen J Gagnon; Jai W Seo; Fitz-Roy Curry; Frits Thorsen; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  2D and 3D texture analysis to differentiate brain metastases on MR images: proceed with caution.

Authors:  Monika Béresová; Andrés Larroza; Estanislao Arana; József Varga; László Balkay; David Moratal
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Serial diffusion MRI to monitor and model treatment response of the targeted nanotherapy CRLX101.

Authors:  Thomas S C Ng; David Wert; Hargun Sohi; Daniel Procissi; David Colcher; Andrew A Raubitschek; Russell E Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Automated computer quantification of breast cancer in small-animal models using PET-guided MR image co-segmentation.

Authors:  Ulas Bagci; Gabriela Kramer-Marek; Daniel J Mollura
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.138

6.  Does the novel integrated PET/MRI offer the same diagnostic performance as PET/CT for oncological indications?

Authors:  Jiahe Tian; Liping Fu; Dayi Yin; Jinming Zhang; Yingmao Chen; Ningyu An; Baixuan Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Tumor quantification in clinical positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Bing Bai; James Bading; Peter S Conti
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 11.556

8.  Correlation of perfusion MRI and 18F-FDG PET imaging biomarkers for monitoring regorafenib therapy in experimental colon carcinomas with immunohistochemical validation.

Authors:  Ralf S Eschbach; Wolfgang P Fendler; Philipp M Kazmierczak; Marcus Hacker; Axel Rominger; Janette Carlsen; Heidrun Hirner-Eppeneder; Jessica Schuster; Matthias Moser; Lukas Havla; Moritz J Schneider; Michael Ingrisch; Lukas Spaeth; Maximilian F Reiser; Konstantin Nikolaou; Clemens C Cyran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Characterization of the Tumor Microenvironment and Tumor-Stroma Interaction by Non-invasive Preclinical Imaging.

Authors:  Nirilanto Ramamonjisoa; Ellen Ackerstaff
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 6.244

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.