PURPOSE: Zirconium-89 (t(1/2)=78.41 hours) is an ideal metallic radioisotope for immuno-positron emission tomography (PET), given that its physical half-life closely matches the biological half-life of monoclonal antibodies. In this study, the authors measured the spatial resolution and image quality of Zr-89 PET and compared the results against those obtained using F-18 PET, which is widely regarded as the gold standard for comparison of imaging characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The spatial resolution and image qualities of Zr-89 were measured on the Siemens Biograph Truepoint TrueV PET/CT scanner, partly according to NEMA NU2-2007 standards. For spatial resolution measurement, the Zr-89 point source was located at the center of the axial field of view (FOV) and offset 1/4 axial FOV from the center. For image quality measurements, an NEMA IEC Phantom was used. The NEMA IEC Phantom consists of six hot spheres that were filled with Zr-89 solution. Spatial resolution and image quality (%contrast, %background variability [BV], and source to background ratio [SBR]) were assessed to compare the imaging characteristics of F-18 with those of Siemens Biograph Truepoint TrueV. RESULTS: The transverse and axial spatial resolutions at 1 cm were 4.5 and 4.7 mm for Zr-89, respectively. The %contrast of Zr-89 was 25.5% for the smallest 10 mm sized sphere and 89.8% for the largest 37 mm sized sphere, and for F-18, it was 32.5% for the smallest 10 mm sized sphere and 103.9% for the largest 37 mm sized sphere using the ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstruction method. The %BV of F-18 PET was 6.4% for the smallest 10 mm sized sphere and 3.5% for the largest 37 mm sized sphere using the OSEM reconstruction. The SBR of Zr-89 was 1.8 for the smallest 10 mm sized sphere and 3.7 for the largest 37 mm sized sphere, and for F-18, it was 2.0 for the smallest 10 mm sized sphere and 4.1 for the largest 37 mm sized sphere using the OSEM reconstruction method. CONCLUSIONS: This study assessed Zr-89 imaging characteristics using a Siemens Biograph Truepoint TrueV PET/CT scanner and compared the results with those obtained for F-18 PET. Although spatial resolution and image quality of Zr-89 PET were lower compared with F-18 PET, due to longer positron range and low positron branching ratio, Zr-89 is advantageous for immuno-PET due to well-matched half-life with monoclonal antibodies.
PURPOSE:Zirconium-89 (t(1/2)=78.41 hours) is an ideal metallic radioisotope for immuno-positron emission tomography (PET), given that its physical half-life closely matches the biological half-life of monoclonal antibodies. In this study, the authors measured the spatial resolution and image quality of Zr-89 PET and compared the results against those obtained using F-18 PET, which is widely regarded as the gold standard for comparison of imaging characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The spatial resolution and image qualities of Zr-89 were measured on the Siemens Biograph Truepoint TrueV PET/CT scanner, partly according to NEMA NU2-2007 standards. For spatial resolution measurement, the Zr-89 point source was located at the center of the axial field of view (FOV) and offset 1/4 axial FOV from the center. For image quality measurements, an NEMA IEC Phantom was used. The NEMA IEC Phantom consists of six hot spheres that were filled with Zr-89 solution. Spatial resolution and image quality (%contrast, %background variability [BV], and source to background ratio [SBR]) were assessed to compare the imaging characteristics of F-18 with those of Siemens Biograph Truepoint TrueV. RESULTS: The transverse and axial spatial resolutions at 1 cm were 4.5 and 4.7 mm for Zr-89, respectively. The %contrast of Zr-89 was 25.5% for the smallest 10 mm sized sphere and 89.8% for the largest 37 mm sized sphere, and for F-18, it was 32.5% for the smallest 10 mm sized sphere and 103.9% for the largest 37 mm sized sphere using the ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstruction method. The %BV of F-18 PET was 6.4% for the smallest 10 mm sized sphere and 3.5% for the largest 37 mm sized sphere using the OSEM reconstruction. The SBR of Zr-89 was 1.8 for the smallest 10 mm sized sphere and 3.7 for the largest 37 mm sized sphere, and for F-18, it was 2.0 for the smallest 10 mm sized sphere and 4.1 for the largest 37 mm sized sphere using the OSEM reconstruction method. CONCLUSIONS: This study assessed Zr-89 imaging characteristics using a Siemens Biograph Truepoint TrueV PET/CT scanner and compared the results with those obtained for F-18 PET. Although spatial resolution and image quality of Zr-89 PET were lower compared with F-18 PET, due to longer positron range and low positron branching ratio, Zr-89 is advantageous for immuno-PET due to well-matched half-life with monoclonal antibodies.
Authors: Jonathan A Disselhorst; Maarten Brom; Peter Laverman; Cornelius H Slump; Otto C Boerman; Wim J G Oyen; Martin Gotthardt; Eric P Visser Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-03-17 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Jin Su Kim; Jae Sung Lee; Ki Chun Im; Su Jin Kim; Seog-Young Kim; Dong Soo Lee; Dae Hyuk Moon Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2007-08-17 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Joseph G Rajendran; Ajay K Gopal; Darrel R Fisher; Larry D Durack; Ted A Gooley; Oliver W Press Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2008-04-15 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Yuni K Dewaraja; Scott J Wilderman; Kenneth F Koral; Mark S Kaminski; Anca M Avram Journal: Cancer Biother Radiopharm Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 3.099
Authors: Douglas J Ballon; Jonathan B Rosenberg; Edward K Fung; Anastasia Nikolopoulou; Paresh Kothari; Bishnu P De; Bin He; Alvin Chen; Linda A Heier; Dolan Sondhi; Stephen M Kaminsky; Paul David Mozley; John W Babich; Ronald G Crystal Journal: Hum Gene Ther Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 5.695
Authors: David Bauer; Hannah Visca; Anuradha Weerakkody; Lukas M Carter; Zachary Samuels; Spencer Kaminsky; Oleg A Andreev; Yana K Reshetnyak; Jason S Lewis Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-05-19 Impact factor: 5.738
Authors: Ananthi Somasundaram; David Vállez García; Elisabeth Pfaehler; Yvonne W S Jauw; Josée M Zijlstra; Guus A M S van Dongen; Willemien C Menke-van der Houven van Oordt; Marc C Huisman; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Ronald Boellaard Journal: EJNMMI Phys Date: 2022-03-03
Authors: Adam Martersteck; Ivan Ayala; Daniel T Ohm; Callen Spencer; Christina Coventry; Sandra Weintraub; Eileen H Bigio; M -Marsel Mesulam; Changiz Geula; Emily Rogalski Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun Date: 2022-08-09 Impact factor: 7.578