PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to determine the reproducibility of static 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG), 3'-deoxy-3'-[(18)F]fluorothymidine ((18)F-FLT), and [(18)F]-fluoromisonidazole ((18)F-FMISO) microPET measurements, as well as kinetic parameters returned from analyses of dynamic (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FMISO data. PROCEDURES: HER2+ xenografts were established in nude mice. Dynamic data were acquired for 60 min, followed by a repeat injection and second scan 6 h later. Reproducibility was assessed for the percent-injected dose per gram (%ID/g) for each radiotracer, and with kinetic parameters (K (1) -k (4) , K ( i )) for (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FMISO. RESULTS: The value needed to reflect a change in tumor physiology is given by the 95 % confidence interval (CI), which is ±14, ±5, and ±6 % for (18)F-FDG (n = 12), (18)F-FLT (n = 11), and (18)F-FMISO (n = 11) %ID/g, respectively. V ( d ) (=K (1) /k (2)), k (3), and K (FLT) are the most reproducible (18)F-FLT (n = 9) kinetic parameters, with 95 % CIs of ±18, ±10, and ±18 %, respectively. V ( d ) and K (FMISO) are the most reproducible (18)F-FMISO kinetic parameters (n = 7) with 95 % CIs of ±16 and ±14 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Percent-injected dose per gram measurements are reproducible and appropriate for detecting treatment-induced changes. Kinetic parameters have larger threshold values, but are potentially sufficiently reproducible to detect treatment response.
PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to determine the reproducibility of static 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG), 3'-deoxy-3'-[(18)F]fluorothymidine ((18)F-FLT), and [(18)F]-fluoromisonidazole ((18)F-FMISO) microPET measurements, as well as kinetic parameters returned from analyses of dynamic (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FMISO data. PROCEDURES: HER2+ xenografts were established in nude mice. Dynamic data were acquired for 60 min, followed by a repeat injection and second scan 6 h later. Reproducibility was assessed for the percent-injected dose per gram (%ID/g) for each radiotracer, and with kinetic parameters (K (1) -k (4) , K ( i )) for (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FMISO. RESULTS: The value needed to reflect a change in tumor physiology is given by the 95 % confidence interval (CI), which is ±14, ±5, and ±6 % for (18)F-FDG (n = 12), (18)F-FLT (n = 11), and (18)F-FMISO (n = 11) %ID/g, respectively. V ( d ) (=K (1) /k (2)), k (3), and K (FLT) are the most reproducible (18)F-FLT (n = 9) kinetic parameters, with 95 % CIs of ±18, ±10, and ±18 %, respectively. V ( d ) and K (FMISO) are the most reproducible (18)F-FMISO kinetic parameters (n = 7) with 95 % CIs of ±16 and ±14 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Percent-injected dose per gram measurements are reproducible and appropriate for detecting treatment-induced changes. Kinetic parameters have larger threshold values, but are potentially sufficiently reproducible to detect treatment response.
Authors: Jonathan A Disselhorst; Maarten Brom; Peter Laverman; Cornelius H Slump; Otto C Boerman; Wim J G Oyen; Martin Gotthardt; Eric P Visser Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-03-17 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Christoph Oehler; Joseph A O'Donoghue; James Russell; Pat Zanzonico; Sylvie Lorenzen; C Clifton Ling; Sean Carlin Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2011-02-14 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Susan M Galbraith; Martin A Lodge; N Jane Taylor; Gordon J S Rustin; Søren Bentzen; J James Stirling; Anwar R Padhani Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Mark Muzi; David A Mankoff; John R Grierson; Joanne M Wells; Hubert Vesselle; Kenneth A Krohn Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Tshering D Lama-Sherpa; Shamik Das; Dominique C Hinshaw; Sarah C Kammerud; Patrick N Song; Heba A Alsheikh; Anna G Sorace; Rajeev S Samant; Lalita A Shevde Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2021-09-30 Impact factor: 6.333
Authors: Richard G Abramson; Kirsteen R Burton; John-Paul J Yu; Ernest M Scalzetti; Thomas E Yankeelov; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Mishal Mendiratta-Lala; Brian J Bartholmai; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Leon Lenchik; Rathan M Subramaniam Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Anna G Sorace; Anum K Syed; Stephanie L Barnes; C Chad Quarles; Violeta Sanchez; Hakmook Kang; Thomas E Yankeelov Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Keisha C McCall; Su-Chun Cheng; Ying Huang; Nancy E Kohl; Tanya Tupper; Annick D Van den Abbeele; Katherine A Zukotynski; Christopher J Sweeney Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: Kooresh I Shoghi; Cristian T Badea; Stephanie J Blocker; Thomas L Chenevert; Richard Laforest; Michael T Lewis; Gary D Luker; H Charles Manning; Daniel S Marcus; Yvonne M Mowery; Stephen Pickup; Ann Richmond; Brian D Ross; Anna E Vilgelm; Thomas E Yankeelov; Rong Zhou Journal: Tomography Date: 2020-09