Literature DB >> 20232028

[Revision arthroplasty of the hip: acetabular component].

H Gollwitzer1, R von Eisenhart-Rothe, B M Holzapfel, R Gradinger.   

Abstract

Approximately 18,000 hip revision procedures of the acetabular component are performed annually in Germany with rising incidence. The aims of acetabular revision are reconstruction of the anatomic hip center, reconstruction of bone stock, cement-free primary stability of the revision implant in autochthonous bone and permanent secondary integration.Precise planning of the revision surgery is necessary with analysis and classification of the bone defects and reconstruction following a concise therapeutic concept. Cup loosening without bone loss as well as segmental bone defects can usually be reconstructed with standard implants. Cavity defects, especially the common craniolateral defects, require the implantation of oval cups or augments to achieve anatomic reconstruction of the hip center. Combined segmental and cavity defects can be reconstructed using oval cups with craniolateral plates, whereas acetabular discontinuity requires stable fixation within the iliac wing by means of an intramedullary stem combined with an extramedullary plate. Middle and long term survival greater than 90% can be realized with the use of this therapeutic concept.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20232028     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-009-1845-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  18 in total

1.  The treatment of pelvic discontinuity with acetabular cages.

Authors:  Wayne Paprosky; Scott Sporer; Michael R O'Rourke
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  [Comparison of different cup revision systems].

Authors:  K Trieb
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  [The German Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology classification of bone defects in total hip endoprostheses revision operations].

Authors:  D Bettin; B D Katthagen
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug

4.  [Standardized reconstruction of acetabular bone defects using the cranial socket system].

Authors:  Maximilian Rudert; Boris Michael Holzapfel; Florian Kratzer; Reiner Gradinger
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.154

5.  Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants.

Authors:  R M Pilliar; J M Lee; C Maniatopoulos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Acetabular and femoral reconstruction with impacted graft and cement.

Authors:  T J Slooff; P Buma; B W Schreurs; J W Schimmel; R Huiskes; J Gardeniers
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Principles of bone grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty. Acetabular technique.

Authors:  W G Paprosky; R E Magnus
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Retrieved human allografts : a clinicopathological study.

Authors:  W F Enneking; D A Campanacci
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J A D'Antonio; W N Capello; L S Borden; W L Bargar; B F Bierbaum; W G Boettcher; M E Steinberg; S D Stulberg; J H Wedge
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The Effectiveness of the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for acetabular bone deficiency: five to twenty-one years' follow-up.

Authors:  Panagiotis P Symeonides; George E Petsatodes; John D Pournaras; George A Kapetanos; Anastasios G Christodoulou; Dimitrios J Marougiannis
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  8 in total

1.  [Mega cups and partial pelvic replacement].

Authors:  R von Eisenhart-Rothe; H Gollwitzer; A Toepfer; H Pilge; B M Holzapfel; H Rechl; R Gradinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Acetabular defect classification in times of 3D imaging and patient-specific treatment protocols.

Authors:  K Horas; J Arnholdt; A F Steinert; M Hoberg; M Rudert; B M Holzapfel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  [Treatment of acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty using the Revisio-System].

Authors:  M Hoberg; B M Holzapfel; A F Steinert; F Kratzer; M Walcher; M Rudert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  [Total hip replacement in developmental dysplasia: anatomical features and technical pitfalls].

Authors:  B M Holzapfel; D Bürklein; F Greimel; U Nöth; M Hoberg; H Gollwitzer; M Rudert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  [Partial pelvic resection (internal hemipelvectomy) and endoprosthetic replacement in periacetabular tumors].

Authors:  M Rudert; B M Holzapfel; H Pilge; H Rechl; R Gradinger
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.154

6.  [Bone defect adjusted strategy in revision arthroplasty of the hip : Wich implant in wich situation? Innovations and approved methods].

Authors:  B S Craiovan; J Grifka; A Keshmiri; B Moser; M Wörner; T Renkawitz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Bipolar hip arthroplasty as salvage treatment for loosening of the acetabular cup with significant bone defects.

Authors:  Mohamed Ghanem; Almuth Glase; Dirk Zajonz; Andreas Roth; Christoph-E Heyde; Christoph Josten; Georg von Salis-Soglio
Journal:  GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW       Date:  2016-04-04

8.  Acetabular defect classification and management : Revision arthroplasty of the acetabular cup based on 3-point fixation.

Authors:  Mohamed Ghanem; Dirk Zajonz; Christoph-Eckhard Heyde; Andreas Roth
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.087

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.