Literature DB >> 19693623

[Comparison of different cup revision systems].

K Trieb1.   

Abstract

Aseptic loosening of hip cups results in cranial and medial migration, which induces bone resorption and defects. Despite these defects, it is the aim in cup revision arthroplasty to get a stable fixation and a restoration of the hip center. Depending on the size of the defect, which can be classified by different scoring systems, various strategies requiring an experienced surgeon can be used to reach this aim. If defects are localized, bigger primary cemented or cement-free cups can be used. Larger defects may need bone transplantation or special designs such as oval cups or reinforcement rings. They can be used with or without plates in combination with cement for inlay fixation. In the case of bigger defects or pelvic discontinuity, modular systems or a socket cup may be necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19693623     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-009-1429-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  26 in total

1.  The use of reinforcement rings to reconstruct deficient acetabula.

Authors:  J Rosson; J Schatzker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-09

2.  Acetabular revision surgery with the LOR cup: three to 8 years' follow-up.

Authors:  Michele F Surace; Giovanni Zatti; Marco De Pietri; Paolo Cherubino
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Porous-ingrowth revision acetabular implants secured with peripheral screws. A minimum twelve-year follow-up.

Authors:  Steven H Weeden; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  [The reconstruction of extended acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty--risk factors for migration and loosening using the pedestal cup].

Authors:  S Tohtz; H Katterle; G Matziolis; T Drahn; C Perka
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.923

5.  [Treatment by resealing of a new prosthesis].

Authors:  M Kerboull
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1975

6.  Modes of periacetabular load transfer to cortical and cancellous bone after cemented versus uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study using computed tomography-assisted osteodensitometry.

Authors:  Lutz Arne Mueller; Rainer Schmidt; Cornelia Ehrmann; Tobias Eckhard Nowak; Alexander Kress; Raimund Forst; David Pfander
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  [Hooked roof cup in revision of difficult loose hip prosthesis cups. Results after a minimum of 10 years].

Authors:  K A Siebenrock; M Trochsler; H Sadri; R Ganz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  An oblong revision cup for large acetabular defects: design rationale and two- to seven-year follow-up.

Authors:  G Köster; H G Willert; H P Köhler; K Döpkens
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  [Acetabular revision for aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty using cementless cup and impacted morselized allograft].

Authors:  S Parratte; J-N Argenson; X Flecher; J-M Aubaniac
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  2007-05

10.  Acetabular revision with impacted morselized cancellous bone graft and a cemented cup in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. A concise follow-up, at eight to nineteen years, of a previous report.

Authors:  B Willem Schreurs; Jaap Luttjeboer; Truike M Thien; Maarten C de Waal Malefijt; Pieter Buma; René P H Veth; Tom J J H Slooff
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  5 in total

1.  [Revision arthroplasty of the hip: acetabular component].

Authors:  H Gollwitzer; R von Eisenhart-Rothe; B M Holzapfel; R Gradinger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  CORR Insights(®): THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects.

Authors:  José Cordero-Ampuero
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  [Treatment of acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty using the Revisio-System].

Authors:  M Hoberg; B M Holzapfel; A F Steinert; F Kratzer; M Walcher; M Rudert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  [Standardized reconstruction of acetabular bone defects using the cranial socket system].

Authors:  Maximilian Rudert; Boris Michael Holzapfel; Florian Kratzer; Reiner Gradinger
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.154

5.  Acetabular reconstruction with the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage and bulk allografts: minimum 10-year follow-up results.

Authors:  Dario Regis; Andrea Sandri; Ingrid Bonetti
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.