Literature DB >> 20862576

[Mega cups and partial pelvic replacement].

R von Eisenhart-Rothe1, H Gollwitzer, A Toepfer, H Pilge, B M Holzapfel, H Rechl, R Gradinger.   

Abstract

Extensive bone loss, as encountered in both revision arthroplasty of the hip and after resection of malignant tumors of the pelvis, is a major challenge for the surgeon as well as for the revision implant. The aims are, despite extensive acetabular defects, to achieve a primary and load-stable fixation of the revision prosthesis in the pelvic bone as well as restoring the physiological joint biomechanics. At present, a large number of different alloarthroplastic revision implants and complex techniques are available for reconstruction of acetabular deficiencies. According to D'Antonio's classification of acetabular defects, particularly high-grade defects with loss of the posterior column or a pelvic discontinuity require special attention regarding implant selection and surgical planning. The object of this paper is to highlight the most important tools and techniques of endoprosthetic reconstruction for grade III and IV defects (D'Antonio) of the acetabulum by means of a classification-oriented therapeutic concept and to discuss the pros and cons of the particular implant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20862576     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-009-1568-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  50 in total

1.  Internal hemipelvectomy for solitary pelvic thyroid cancer metastases.

Authors:  M J Boyle; F J Hornicek; D S Robinson; W Mnaymneh
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  [The reconstruction of extended acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty--risk factors for migration and loosening using the pedestal cup].

Authors:  S Tohtz; H Katterle; G Matziolis; T Drahn; C Perka
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.923

3.  Revision following cemented and uncemented primary total hip replacement: a seven-year analysis from the New Zealand Joint Registry.

Authors:  G J Hooper; A G Rothwell; M Stringer; C Frampton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-04

4.  Tantalum components in difficult acetabular revisions.

Authors:  Paul F Lachiewicz; Elizabeth S Soileau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  High failure rate of bulk femoral head allografts in total hip acetabular reconstructions at 10 years.

Authors:  L M Kwong; M Jasty; W H Harris
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Megaprosthetic replacement of the pelvis: function in 17 cases.

Authors:  R J Wirbel; M Schulte; B Maier; W E Mutschler
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1999-08

7.  Revision arthroplasty using an anti-protrusio cage for massive acetabular bone deficiency.

Authors:  D J Berry; M E Müller
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-09

8.  Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J A D'Antonio; W N Capello; L S Borden; W L Bargar; B F Bierbaum; W G Boettcher; M E Steinberg; S D Stulberg; J H Wedge
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Osteosarcoma of the pelvis.

Authors:  D Donati; S Giacomini; E Gozzi; S Ferrari; L Sangiorgi; A Tienghi; H DeGroot; F Bertoni; P Bacchini; G Bacci; M Mercuri
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.424

10.  Malignant tumors of the pelvis: an outcome study.

Authors:  Henry J Mankin; Francis J Hornicek; H Thomas Temple; Mark C Gebhardt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  5 in total

1.  [In Process Citation].

Authors:  D Kohn
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Acetabular defect classification in times of 3D imaging and patient-specific treatment protocols.

Authors:  K Horas; J Arnholdt; A F Steinert; M Hoberg; M Rudert; B M Holzapfel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  [Treatment of acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty using the Revisio-System].

Authors:  M Hoberg; B M Holzapfel; A F Steinert; F Kratzer; M Walcher; M Rudert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  [Partial pelvic resection (internal hemipelvectomy) and endoprosthetic replacement in periacetabular tumors].

Authors:  M Rudert; B M Holzapfel; H Pilge; H Rechl; R Gradinger
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.154

5.  [Bone defect adjusted strategy in revision arthroplasty of the hip : Wich implant in wich situation? Innovations and approved methods].

Authors:  B S Craiovan; J Grifka; A Keshmiri; B Moser; M Wörner; T Renkawitz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.087

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.