Literature DB >> 8118969

Principles of bone grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty. Acetabular technique.

W G Paprosky1, R E Magnus.   

Abstract

Multiple revisions of the acetabulum ultimately lead to severe loss of bone stock. Each bone loss type requires a specific method of allograft reconstruction to achieve acetabular component stability. A series of 316 acetabular revisions in which 69 required support allograft were followed for a mean of 5.1 years (range, two to ten years). Support allograft was required when radiographs showed superior component migration greater than 2 cm. Severe ischial lysis was indicative of posterior column insufficiency. Distal femurs were used instead of femoral heads as support for porous-coated cups. If in addition to the radiographic findings, Kohler's line also was violated (which was indicative of anterior column deficiency as well), then whole acetabular allografts were used with cemented polyethylene cups. Biologic fixation of a porous-coated cup and support allograft were not possible in these cases. All of the distal femoral allografts united to host bone, and there was no migration of porous-coated components at a mean of 5.1 years when Kohler's line was intact. When Kohler's line was not intact, 70% of the porous cups had migrated more than 4 mm and were considered failures. Conversely, when whole acetabular allografts with cemented polyethylene cups were used in these cases, all 14 showed graft union and no change in the cement-graft interface at a minimum follow-up period of 24 months. The postoperative clinical results using the D'Aubigne and Postel rating scales were 10.1 of 12, with 76% good to excellent results. This study indicates that better results with support allografts can be achieved at similar periods than has previously been reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8118969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  28 in total

1.  [Revision arthroplasty of the hip: acetabular component].

Authors:  H Gollwitzer; R von Eisenhart-Rothe; B M Holzapfel; R Gradinger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  The survival and fate of acetabular reconstruction with impaction grafting for large defects.

Authors:  Eduardo Garcia-Cimbrelo; Ana Cruz-Pardos; Eduardo Garcia-Rey; José Ortega-Chamarro
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Isolated acetabular revision after total hip arthroplasty: results at 5-9 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Xiao-Dong Chen; James P Waddell; Jane Morton; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Acetabular cage survival and analysis of factors related to failure.

Authors:  Jonathan N Sembrano; Edward Y Cheng
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Type III acetabular defect revision with bilobed components: five-year results.

Authors:  Joseph T Moskal; Michael E Higgins; Joseph Shen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Systematic review on outcomes of acetabular revisions with highly-porous metals.

Authors:  Samik Banerjee; Kimona Issa; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Robert Pivec; Harpal S Khanuja; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  [Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision surgery of the hip. Autologous, homologous or metal?].

Authors:  S Gravius; G Pagenstert; O Weber; N Kraska; H Röhrig; D C Wirtz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Management of Paprosky type three B acetabular defects by custom-made components: early results.

Authors:  Alessandro Aprato; Matteo Giachino; Paolo Bedino; Danilo Mellano; Raimondo Piana; Alessandro Massè
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  [Standardized reconstruction of acetabular bone defects using the cranial socket system].

Authors:  Maximilian Rudert; Boris Michael Holzapfel; Florian Kratzer; Reiner Gradinger
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.154

10.  Continued good results with modular trabecular metal augments for acetabular defects in hip arthroplasty at 7 to 11 years.

Authors:  Michael R Whitehouse; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.