Literature DB >> 22743633

[Partial pelvic resection (internal hemipelvectomy) and endoprosthetic replacement in periacetabular tumors].

M Rudert1, B M Holzapfel, H Pilge, H Rechl, R Gradinger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Treatment of tumors of the pelvic girdle by resection of part or all of the innominate bone with preservation of the extremity. Implantation and stable fixation using a custom-made megaprosthesis to restore painless joint function and loading capacity. The surgical goal is to obtain a wide surgical margin and local tumor control. INDICATIONS: Primary bone and soft tissue sarcomas, benign or semi-malignant aggressive lesions, metastatic disease (radiation resistance and/or good prognosis). CONTRAINDICATIONS: Limited life expectancy and poor physical status, extensive metastatic disease, persistent deep infection or recalcitrant osteomyelitis, poor therapeutic compliance, local recurrence following a previous limb-sparing resection, extensive infiltration of the neurovascular structures and the intra- and extrapelvic soft tissues. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Levels of osteotomy are defined preoperatively by a CT-controlled manufactured three-dimensional 1:1 model of the pelvis. Using these data, the custom-made prosthesis and osteotomy templates are then constructed by the manufacturer. The anterior (internal, retroperitoneal) and posterior (extrapelvic, retrogluteal) aspects of the pelvis are exposed using the utilitarian incision surgical approach. The external iliac and femoral vessels are mobilized as they cross the superior pubic ramus. The adductor muscles, the rectus femoris and sartorius muscle are released from their insertions on the pelvis and the obturator vessels and nerve are transected. If the tumor extends to the hip joint, the femur is transected at a level distal to the intertrochanteric line to ensure hip joint integrity and to prevent tumor contamination. A large myocutaneous flap with the gluteus maximus muscle is retracted posteriorly. The pelvitrochanteric and small gluteal muscles are divided near their insertion in the upper border of the femur. To release the hamstrings and the attachment of the sacrotuberous ligament, the ischial tuberosity is exposed. After osteotomy using the prefabricated templates, the pelvis is released and the specimen is removed en bloc. The custom made prosthesis can either be fixed to the remaining iliac bone or to the massa lateralis of the sacrum. The released muscles are refixated on the remaining bone or the implant. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Time of mobilization and degree of weight-bearing depends on the extent of muscle resection. Usually partial loading of the operated limb with 10 kg for a period of 6-12 weeks, then increased loading with 10 kg per week. Thrombosis prophylaxis until full weight bearing. Physiotherapy and gait training. At follow-up, patients are monitored for local recurrence and metastases using history, physical examination, and radiographic studies.
RESULTS: Between 1994 and 2008, 38 consecutive patients with periacetabular tumors were treated by resection and reconstruction with a custom-made pelvic megaprosthesis. The overall survival of the patients was 58% at 5 years and 30% at 10 years. One or more operative revisions were performed in 52.6% of the patients. The rate of local recurrence was 15.8%. Deep infection (21%) was the most common reason for revision. In two of these cases (5.3%), a secondary external hemipelvectomy had to be performed. There were four cases of aseptic loosening (10.5%) in which the prosthesis had to be revised. Six patients had recurrent hip dislocation (15.8%). In four of them a modification of the inserted inlay and an implantation of a trevira tube had to be performed respectively. Peroneal palsy occurred in 6 patients (15.8%) with recovery in only two. There were 4 operative interventions because of postoperative bleeding (10.5%). The mean MSTS score for 12 of the 18 living patients was 43.7%. In particular, gait was classified as poor and almost all patients were reliant on walking aids. However, most patients showed good emotional acceptance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22743633     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-012-0161-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  42 in total

1.  Approach to and exposure of the hip joint for mold arthroplasty.

Authors:  M N SMITH-PETERSEN
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1949-01       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Topical application of tranexamic acid reduces postoperative blood loss in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Jean Wong; Amir Abrishami; Hossam El Beheiry; Nizar N Mahomed; J Roderick Davey; Rajiv Gandhi; Khalid A Syed; Syed Muhammad Ovais Hasan; Yoshani De Silva; Frances Chung
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  [Standardized reconstruction of acetabular bone defects using the cranial socket system].

Authors:  Maximilian Rudert; Boris Michael Holzapfel; Florian Kratzer; Reiner Gradinger
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 4.  Chondrosarcoma of the pelvis. A review of sixty-four cases.

Authors:  M E Pring; K L Weber; K K Unni; F H Sim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Immediate reconstruction of oncologic hemipelvectomy defects.

Authors:  Kevin Knox; Ioannis Bitzos; Mark Granick; Ramazi Datiashvili; Joseph Benevenia; Francis Patterson
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.539

Review 6.  Biopsy of bone and soft tissue tumours: hints and hazards.

Authors:  Andreas Leithner; Werner Maurer-Ertl; Reinhard Windhager
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  2009

7.  Proximal deep vein thrombosis after hip replacement for oncologic indications.

Authors:  Saminathan S Nathan; Kristy A Simmons; Patrick P Lin; Lucy E Hann; Carol D Morris; Edward A Athanasian; Patrick J Boland; John H Healey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Computer-aided custom-made hemipelvic prosthesis used in extensive pelvic lesions.

Authors:  Ke-Rong Dai; Meng-Ning Yan; Zhen-An Zhu; Yue-Hua Sun
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Functional results and quality of life after treatment of pelvic sarcomas involving the acetabulum.

Authors:  C Hoffmann; G Gosheger; C Gebert; H Jürgens; W Winkelmann
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Resection and reconstruction for primary neoplasms involving the innominate bone.

Authors:  W F Enneking; W K Dunham
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  11 in total

1.  Customised osteotomy guides and endoprosthetic reconstruction for periacetabular tumours.

Authors:  Boris Michael Holzapfel; Hakan Pilge; Peter Michael Prodinger; Andreas Toepfer; Susanne Mayer-Wagner; Dietmar Werner Hutmacher; Ruediger von Eisenhart-Rothe; Maximilian Rudert; Reiner Gradinger; Hans Rechl
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  "Advances in the surgical management of bone tumors".

Authors:  Justin E Bird
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  [Revision arthroplasty of the hip : Direct anterior approach].

Authors:  M Krismer; M Nogler
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Incidence and management of hip dislocation in tumour patients with a modular prosthesis of the proximal femur.

Authors:  Stephan E Puchner; Philipp T Funovics; Christian Hipfl; Martin Dominkus; Reinhard Windhager; Jochen G Hofstaetter
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  [Treatment concepts for complications after resection and defect reconstruction of pelvic tumours].

Authors:  J Hardes; W Guder; A Streitbürger; L Podleska; P Rödder; G Täger; M Dudda; M Nottrott
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 6.  Reconstruction of multiple myeloma lesions around the pelvis and acetabulum.

Authors:  Vasileios I Sakellariou; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Olga Savvidou; Franklin H Sim; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-10-19

7.  Reconstruction After Hemipelvectomy With the Ice-Cream Cone Prosthesis: What Are the Short-term Clinical Results?

Authors:  Irene Barrientos-Ruiz; Eduardo José Ortiz-Cruz; Manuel Peleteiro-Pensado
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Tumor resection at the pelvis using three-dimensional planning and patient-specific instruments: a case series.

Authors:  Thorsten Jentzsch; Lazaros Vlachopoulos; Philipp Fürnstahl; Daniel A Müller; Bruno Fuchs
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Can bone tissue engineering contribute to therapy concepts after resection of musculoskeletal sarcoma?

Authors:  Boris Michael Holzapfel; Mohit Prashant Chhaya; Ferry Petrus Wilhelmus Melchels; Nina Pauline Holzapfel; Peter Michael Prodinger; Ruediger von Eisenhart-Rothe; Martijn van Griensven; Jan-Thorsten Schantz; Maximilian Rudert; Dietmar Werner Hutmacher
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2013-01-14

10.  Taking the Next Step in Personalised Orthopaedic Implantation.

Authors:  Maximilian Rudert
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.