Literature DB >> 20144340

Factors affecting blood glucose monitoring: sources of errors in measurement.

Barry H Ginsberg1.   

Abstract

Glucose monitoring has become an integral part of diabetes care but has some limitations in accuracy. Accuracy may be limited due to strip manufacturing variances, strip storage, and aging. They may also be due to limitations on the environment such as temperature or altitude or to patient factors such as improper coding, incorrect hand washing, altered hematocrit, or naturally occurring interfering substances. Finally, exogenous interfering substances may contribute errors to the system evaluation of blood glucose. In this review, I discuss the measurement of error in blood glucose, the sources of error, and their mechanism and potential solutions to improve accuracy in the hands of the patient. I also discuss the clinical measurement of system accuracy and methods of judging the suitability of clinical trials and finally some methods of overcoming the inaccuracies. I have included comments about additional information or education that could be done today by manufacturers in the appropriate sections. Areas that require additional work are discussed in the final section. Copyright 2009 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20144340      PMCID: PMC2769960          DOI: 10.1177/193229680900300438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  14 in total

Review 1.  Issues and implications in the selection of blood glucose monitoring technologies.

Authors:  K R Ervin; E J Kiser
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  The effect of haematocrit on reagent strip tests for glucose.

Authors:  K Wiener
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  1991 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 4.359

3.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2008.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Effect of hematocrit concentration on blood glucose value determined on Glucometer II.

Authors:  P B Barreau; J E Buttery
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  The effects of skin temperature and testing site on blood glucose measurements taken by a modern blood glucose monitoring device.

Authors:  A Haupt; B Berg; P Paschen; M Dreyer; H-U Häring; J Smedegaard; S Matthaei
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  Multicenter study of oxygen-insensitive handheld glucose point-of-care testing in critical care/hospital/ambulatory patients in the United States and Canada.

Authors:  G J Kost; H T Vu; J H Lee; P Bourgeois; F L Kiechle; C Martin; S S Miller; A O Okorodudu; J J Podczasy; R Webster; K J Whitlow
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Effect of adverse storage conditions on performance of glucometer test strips.

Authors:  Richard Bamberg; Kathleen Schulman; Melissa MacKenzie; Joanna Moore; Sarah Olchesky
Journal:  Clin Lab Sci       Date:  2005

Review 8.  The role of self-monitoring of blood glucose in the care of people with diabetes: report of a global consensus conference.

Authors:  Richard M Bergenstal; James R Gavin
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Interference of maltose, icodextrin, galactose, or xylose with some blood glucose monitoring systems.

Authors:  Thomas G Schleis
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.705

Review 10.  Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) in insulin- and non-insulin-using adults with diabetes: consensus recommendations for improving SMBG accuracy, utilization, and research.

Authors:  Irl B Hirsch; Bruce W Bode; Belinda P Childs; Kelly L Close; William A Fisher; James R Gavin; Barry H Ginsberg; Charles H Raine; Carol A Verderese
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.118

View more
  96 in total

1.  We need tighter regulatory standards for blood glucose monitoring, but they should be for accuracy disclosure.

Authors:  Barry H Ginsberg
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-09-01

2.  Diabetes in the desert: what do patients know about the heat?

Authors:  Adrienne A Nassar; Raymond D Childs; Mary E Boyle; Kimberly A Jameson; Margaret Fowke; Ken R Waters; Michael J Hovan; Curtiss B Cook
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-09-01

Review 3.  Actionable self-monitoring of blood glucose: redefining the role for patients using multiple daily injection therapy.

Authors:  David Kerr; Rebecca Messing; Ansgar Resch
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-11-01

4.  Continuous glucose monitoring: real-time algorithms for calibration, filtering, and alarms.

Authors:  B Wayne Bequette
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-03-01

5.  Whole blood glucose analysis based on smartphone camera module.

Authors:  Jasmine Pramila Devadhasan; Hyunhee Oh; Cheol Soo Choi; Sanghyo Kim
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.170

6.  Evaluation of the Abbot FreeStyle Optium Neo H blood glucose meter in the hyperbaric oxygen environment.

Authors:  Carol R Baines; P David Cooper; Geraldine A O'Rourke; Charne Miller
Journal:  Diving Hyperb Med       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 0.887

7.  Accuracy in blood glucose measurement: what will a tightening of requirements yield?

Authors:  Lutz Heinemann; Volker Lodwig; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-01

8.  Comparative Accuracy of 17 Point-of-Care Glucose Meters.

Authors:  Laya Ekhlaspour; Debbie Mondesir; Norman Lautsch; Courtney Balliro; Mallory Hillard; Kendra Magyar; Laura Goergen Radocchia; Aryan Esmaeili; Manasi Sinha; Steven J Russell
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-10-03

9.  Patient Satisfaction With a New, High Accuracy Blood Glucose Meter That Provides Personalized Guidance, Insight, and Encouragement.

Authors:  Laurence B Katz; Lorna Stewart; Brian Guthrie; Hilary Cameron
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-08-02

10.  The relationships between common measures of glucose meter performance.

Authors:  Daniel R Wilmoth
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.