Literature DB >> 20920449

We need tighter regulatory standards for blood glucose monitoring, but they should be for accuracy disclosure.

Barry H Ginsberg1.   

Abstract

Regulatory interest has focused on the accuracy of blood glucose monitoring systems. Currently, almost all systems meet the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15197 clinical standard (≥95% of the values within 20% of the reference for values above 75 mg/dl and within 15 mg/dl below that level). Should the systems have to meet one of the extended ISO standards of 15%, 10%, or even 5%? There is a wide variety of people with diabetes doing glucose monitoring, and the majority do not need better accuracy. Indeed, when selecting an insulin dose, the inaccuracy of the glucose reading has little effect compared with the inaccuracy in counting carbohydrates and the variability in insulin absorption. It might be far better to evaluate the accuracy in a standard method and provide the accuracy values on a standard label. Patients and health care providers could then select the monitoring system that best meets their needs.
© 2010 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20920449      PMCID: PMC2956814          DOI: 10.1177/193229681000400528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  9 in total

Review 1.  Dynamic electrochemistry: methodology and application.

Authors:  J L Anderson; L A Coury; J Leddy
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Regulatory controversies surround blood glucose monitoring devices.

Authors:  David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-03-01

3.  Impact of blood glucose self-monitoring errors on glucose variability, risk for hypoglycemia, and average glucose control in type 1 diabetes: an in silico study.

Authors:  Marc D Breton; Boris P Kovatchev
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-05-01

Review 4.  Factors affecting blood glucose monitoring: sources of errors in measurement.

Authors:  Barry H Ginsberg
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

5.  Quality specifications for glucose meters: assessment by simulation modeling of errors in insulin dose.

Authors:  J C Boyd; D E Bruns
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 8.327

6.  System accuracy evaluation of 27 blood glucose monitoring systems according to DIN EN ISO 15197.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Annette Baumstark; Nina Jendrike; Eva Zschornack; Serge Kocher; Jacques Tshiananga; Frank Heister; Cornelia Haug
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.118

7.  Consensus report of the coalition for clinical research-self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors:  David C Klonoff; Richard Bergenstal; Lawrence Blonde; Suzanne Austin Boren; Timothy S Church; Jenifer Gaffaney; Lois Jovanovic; David M Kendall; Craig Kollman; Boris P Kovatchev; Claudia Leippert; David R Owens; William H Polonsky; Gérard Reach; Eric Renard; Michael C Riddell; Richard R Rubin; Oliver Schnell; Linda M Siminiero; Robert A Vigersky; Darrell M Wilson; Alison Okada Wollitzer
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-11

Review 8.  Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) in insulin- and non-insulin-using adults with diabetes: consensus recommendations for improving SMBG accuracy, utilization, and research.

Authors:  Irl B Hirsch; Bruce W Bode; Belinda P Childs; Kelly L Close; William A Fisher; James R Gavin; Barry H Ginsberg; Charles H Raine; Carol A Verderese
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 9.  A review of standards and statistics used to describe blood glucose monitor performance.

Authors:  Jan S Krouwer; George S Cembrowski
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-01-01
  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Accuracy in blood glucose measurement: what will a tightening of requirements yield?

Authors:  Lutz Heinemann; Volker Lodwig; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-01

Review 2.  Challenges of inpatient blood glucose monitoring: standards, methods, and devices to measure blood glucose.

Authors:  Kathie L Hermayer; Aundrea S Loftley; Sumana Reddy; Satya Nandana Narla; Nina A Epps; Yusheng Zhu
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.810

3.  System accuracy evaluation of 43 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to DIN EN ISO 15197.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Christina Schmid; Annette Baumstark; Stefan Pleus; Manuela Link; Cornelia Haug
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-09-01

4.  Analytical performance of glucose monitoring systems at different blood glucose ranges and analysis of outliers in a clinical setting.

Authors:  Christoph Hasslacher; Felix Kulozik; Isabel Platten
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-02-18

Review 5.  Blood glucose testing in the hospital: error sources and risk management.

Authors:  James H Nichols
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-01-01

6.  Age- and sex-related changes in fasting plasma glucose and lipoprotein in cynomolgus monkeys.

Authors:  Feng Yue; Guodong Zhang; Rongping Tang; Zhouquan Zhang; Liqiong Teng; Zhiming Zhang
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.876

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.