Literature DB >> 22538158

Accuracy in blood glucose measurement: what will a tightening of requirements yield?

Lutz Heinemann1, Volker Lodwig, Guido Freckmann.   

Abstract

Nowadays, almost all persons with diabetes--at least those using antidiabetic drug therapy--use one of a plethora of meters commercially available for self-monitoring of blood glucose. The accuracy of blood glucose (BG) measurement using these meters has been presumed to be adequate; that is, the accuracy of these devices was not usually questioned until recently. Health authorities in the United States (Food and Drug Administration) and in other countries are currently endeavoring to tighten the requirements for the accuracy of these meters above the level that is currently stated in the standard ISO 15197. At first glance, this does not appear to be a problem and is hardly worth further consideration, but a closer look reveals a considerable range of critical aspects that will be discussed in this commentary. In summary, one could say that as a result of modern production methods and ongoing technical advances, the demands placed on the quality of measurement results obtained with BG meters can be increased to a certain degree. One should also take into consideration that the system accuracy (which covers many more aspects as the analytical accuracy) required to make correct therapeutical decisions certainly varies for different types of therapy. At the end, in addition to analytical accuracy, thorough and systematic training of patients and regular refresher training is important to minimize errors. Only under such circumstances will patients make appropriate therapeutic interventions to optimize and maintain metabolic control.
© 2012 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22538158      PMCID: PMC3380790          DOI: 10.1177/193229681200600232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  14 in total

1.  We need tighter regulatory standards for blood glucose monitoring, but they should be for accuracy disclosure.

Authors:  Barry H Ginsberg
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-09-01

2.  The need for separate performance goals for glucose sensors in the hypoglycemic, normoglycemic, and hyperglycemic ranges.

Authors:  David C Klonoff
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 3.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose with a focus on analytical quality: an overview.

Authors:  Gunn B B Kristensen; Sverre Sandberg
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 4.  Measurement of insulin absorption and insulin action.

Authors:  Lutz Heinemann; James H Anderson
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  Standardized evaluation of nine instruments for self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors:  Gunn B B Kristensen; Grete Monsen; Svein Skeie; Sverre Sandberg
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  Parameters affecting postprandial blood glucose: effects of blood glucose measurement errors.

Authors:  Theodor Koschinsky; Sascha Heckermann; Lutz Heinemann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-01

7.  Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors:  W L Clarke; D Cox; L A Gonder-Frederick; W Carter; S L Pohl
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  The accuracy of home glucose meters in hypoglycemia.

Authors:  Alper Sonmez; Zeynep Yilmaz; Gokhan Uckaya; Selim Kilic; Serkan Tapan; Abdullah Taslipinar; Aydogan Aydogdu; Mahmut Yazici; Mahmut Ilker Yilmaz; Muhittin Serdar; M Kemal Erbil; Mustafa Kutlu
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.118

9.  Glucose meter performance criteria for tight glycemic control estimated by simulation modeling.

Authors:  Brad S Karon; James C Boyd; George G Klee
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 8.327

10.  Plasma glucose measurement with the Yellow Springs Glucose 2300 STAT and the Olympus AU640.

Authors:  P J Twomey
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Assessing the analytical performance of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose: concepts of performance evaluation and definition of metrological key terms.

Authors:  Oliver Schnell; Rolf Hinzmann; Bernd Kulzer; Guido Freckmann; Michael Erbach; Volker Lodwig; Lutz Heinemann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-11-01

2.  System accuracy evaluation of 43 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to DIN EN ISO 15197.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Christina Schmid; Annette Baumstark; Stefan Pleus; Manuela Link; Cornelia Haug
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-09-01

3.  Clinical evaluation of a novel on-strip calibration method for blood glucose measurement.

Authors:  Michael Noble; John Rippeth; David Edington; Gerry Rayman; Sarah Brandon-Jones; Zoe Hollowood; Simon Kew
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-05-12

4.  Analytical performance of glucose monitoring systems at different blood glucose ranges and analysis of outliers in a clinical setting.

Authors:  Christoph Hasslacher; Felix Kulozik; Isabel Platten
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-02-18

Review 5.  Approaches to display of multiple-point glucose profiles: A UK patient's perspective.

Authors:  Daniel Kay
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-07-02

6.  Accuracy Beyond ISO: Introducing a New Method for Distinguishing Differences Between Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Meeting ISO 15197:2013 Accuracy Requirements.

Authors:  Scott Pardo; Rimma M Shaginian; David A Simmons
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-03-15

7.  System accuracy evaluation of the GlucoRx nexus voice TD-4280 blood glucose monitoring system.

Authors:  Muhammad Khan; Keith Broadbent; Mike Morris; David Ewins; Franklin Joseph
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.434

8.  Demonstration of disinfection procedure for the development of accurate blood glucose meters in accordance with ISO 15197:2013.

Authors:  Shu-Ping Lin; Wen-Ye Lin; Jung-Tzu Chang; Chun-Feng Chu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Measuring and reporting glycemic control in clinical trials: building a path to consensus.

Authors:  Carmen L Soto-Rivera; Michael S D Agus
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  ISO-based assessment of accuracy and precision of glucose meters in dogs.

Authors:  Y Brito-Casillas; P Figueirinhas; J C Wiebe; L López-Ríos; D Pérez-Barreto; C Melián; A M Wägner
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 3.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.