Literature DB >> 20107244

Simultaneous measurement of noise and spatial resolution in PET phantom images.

Martin A Lodge1, Arman Rahmim, Richard L Wahl.   

Abstract

As an aid to evaluating image reconstruction and correction algorithms in positron emission tomography, a phantom procedure has been developed that simultaneously measures image noise and spatial resolution. A commercially available (68)Ge cylinder phantom (20 cm diameter) was positioned in the center of the field-of-view and two identical emission scans were sequentially performed. Image noise was measured by determining the difference between corresponding pixels in the two images and by calculating the standard deviation of these difference data. Spatial resolution was analyzed using a Fourier technique to measure the extent of the blurring at the edge of the phantom images. This paper addresses the noise aspects of the technique as the spatial resolution measurement has been described elsewhere. The noise measurement was validated by comparison with data obtained from multiple replicate images over a range of noise levels. In addition, we illustrate how simultaneous measurement of noise and resolution can be used to evaluate two different corrections for random coincidence events: delayed event subtraction and singles-based randoms correction. For a fixed number of iterations of the maximum-likelihood expectation-maximization algorithm, the singles-based correction gave rise to higher noise than delayed event subtraction. However, when noise and resolution were measured simultaneously it was shown that singles-based randoms correction gave rise to lower noise than delayed event subtraction for a fixed spatial resolution. The proposed method of simultaneously measuring image noise and spatial resolution is useful for evaluating reconstruction algorithms and may aid standardization of data collection between centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20107244      PMCID: PMC3072687          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/4/011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  13 in total

1.  Reproducibility, repeatability, correlation and measurement error.

Authors:  S Halligan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Comparative evaluation of lesion detectability for 6 PET imaging platforms using a highly reproducible whole-body phantom with (22)Na lesions and localization ROC analysis.

Authors:  Dan J Kadrmas; Paul E Christian
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Correction methods for random coincidences in fully 3D whole-body PET: impact on data and image quality.

Authors:  David Brasse; Paul E Kinahan; Carole Lartizien; Claude Comtat; Mike Casey; Christian Michel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 4.  Iterative reconstruction techniques in emission computed tomography.

Authors:  Jinyi Qi; Richard M Leahy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  A practical, automated quality assurance method for measuring spatial resolution in PET.

Authors:  Martin A Lodge; Arman Rahmim; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Measurement error.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-09-21

7.  The convergence of object dependent resolution in maximum likelihood based tomographic image reconstruction.

Authors:  J S Liow; S C Strother
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Correction for scattered radiation in a ring detector positron camera by integral transformation of the projections.

Authors:  M Bergström; L Eriksson; C Bohm; G Blomqvist; J Litton
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Optimization of Rb-82 PET acquisition and reconstruction protocols for myocardial perfusion defect detection.

Authors:  Jing Tang; Arman Rahmim; Riikka Lautamäki; Martin A Lodge; Frank M Bengel; Benjamin M W Tsui
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  Multimodality imaging: an update on PET/CT technology.

Authors:  Osama Mawlawi; David W Townsend
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  8 in total

1.  Noise propagation in resolution modeled PET imaging and its impact on detectability.

Authors:  Arman Rahmim; Jing Tang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Measuring PET Spatial Resolution Using a Cylinder Phantom Positioned at an Oblique Angle.

Authors:  Martin A Lodge; Jeffrey P Leal; Arman Rahmim; John J Sunderland; Eric C Frey
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  The impact of iterative reconstruction protocol, signal-to-background ratio and background activity on measurement of PET spatial resolution.

Authors:  Sahar Rezaei; Pardis Ghafarian; Mehrdad Bakhshayesh-Karam; Carlos F Uribe; Arman Rahmim; Saeed Sarkar; Mohammad Reza Ay
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  High-throughput multiple-mouse imaging with micro-PET/CT for whole-skeleton assessment.

Authors:  Masashi Yagi; Luke Arentsen; Ryan M Shanley; Susanta K Hui
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.685

5.  Effective noise-suppressed and artifact-reduced reconstruction of SPECT data using a preconditioned alternating projection algorithm.

Authors:  Si Li; Jiahan Zhang; Andrzej Krol; C Ross Schmidtlein; Levon Vogelsang; Lixin Shen; Edward Lipson; David Feiglin; Yuesheng Xu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Intra-individual comparison of PET/CT with different body weight-adapted FDG dosage regimens.

Authors:  Jan H Geismar; Paul Stolzmann; Bert-Ram Sah; Irene A Burger; Burkhardt Seifert; Gaspar Delso; Gustav K von Schulthess; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Lars Husmann
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2015-01-29

7.  Uncertainty Analysis in the Calibration of an Emission Tomography System for Quantitative Imaging.

Authors:  Marco D'Arienzo; Maurice Cox
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 2.238

8.  Advanced quantitative evaluation of PET systems using the ACR phantom and NiftyPET software.

Authors:  Pawel J Markiewicz; Casper da Costa-Luis; J Dickson; A Barnes; G Krokos; J MacKewn; T Clark; C Wimberley; G MacNaught; M M Yaqub; J D Gispert; B F Hutton; P Marsden; A Hammers; A J Reader; S Ourselin; K Herholz; J C Matthews; F Barkhof
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.506

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.