Literature DB >> 8426869

The convergence of object dependent resolution in maximum likelihood based tomographic image reconstruction.

J S Liow1, S C Strother.   

Abstract

Study of the maximum likelihood by EM algorithm (ML) with a reconstruction kernel equal to the intrinsic detector resolution and sieve regularization has demonstrated that any image improvements over filtered backprojection (FBP) are a function of image resolution. Comparing different reconstruction algorithms potentially requires measuring and matching the image resolution. Since there are no standard methods for describing the resolution of images from a nonlinear algorithm such as ML, we have defined measures of effective local Gaussian resolution (ELGR) and effective global Gaussian resolution (EGGR) and examined their behaviour in FBP images and in ML images using two different measurement techniques. For FBP these two resolution measures are equal and exhibit the standard convolution behaviour of linear systems. For ML, the FWHM of the ELGR monotonically increased with decreasing Gaussian object size due to slower convergence rates for smaller objects. For the simple simulated phantom used, this resolution dependence is independent of object position. With increasing object size, number of iterations and sieve size the object size dependence of the ELGR decreased. The FWHM of the EGGR converged after approximately 200 iterations, masking the fact that the ELGR for small objects was far from convergence. When FBP is compared to a nonlinear algorithm such as ML, it is recommended that at least the EGGR be matched; for ML this requires more than the number of iterations (e.g., < 100) that are typically run to minimize the mean square error or to satisfy a feasibility or similar stopping criterion. For many tasks, matching the EGGR of ML to FBP images may be insufficient and >> 200 iterations may be needed, particularly for small objects in the ML image because their ELGR has not yet converged.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8426869     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/38/1/005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  21 in total

1.  New SPECT technology: potential and challenges.

Authors:  Brian F Hutton
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  On the assessment of spatial resolution of PET systems with iterative image reconstruction.

Authors:  Kuang Gong; Simon R Cherry; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Evaluation of spatial and temporal resolution for ECG-gated 16-row multidetector CT using a dynamic cardiac phantom.

Authors:  P G C Begemann; U van Stevendaal; R Manzke; A Stork; F Weiss; C Nolte-Ernsting; M Grass; G Adam
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Small animal PET: aspects of performance assessment.

Authors:  Simone Weber; Andreas Bauer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-10-02       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Effect of optical property estimation accuracy on tomographic bioluminescence imaging: simulation of a combined optical-PET (OPET) system.

Authors:  George Alexandrakis; Fernando R Rannou; Arion F Chatziioannou
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Diminishing the impact of the partial volume effect in cardiac SPECT perfusion imaging.

Authors:  P Hendrik Pretorius; Michael A King
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Spillover Compensation in the Presence of Respiratory Motion Embedded in SPECT Perfusion Data.

Authors:  P Hendrik Pretorius; Michael A King
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.679

8.  A practical, automated quality assurance method for measuring spatial resolution in PET.

Authors:  Martin A Lodge; Arman Rahmim; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 9.  Attenuation compensation for cardiac single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging: Part 2. Attenuation compensation algorithms.

Authors:  M A King; B M Tsui; T S Pan; S J Glick; E J Soares
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  No-gold-standard evaluation of image-acquisition methods using patient data.

Authors:  Abhinav K Jha; Eric Frey
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2017-03-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.