Osama Mawlawi1, David W Townsend. 1. Department of Imaging Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Box 1352, Houston, TX 77030, USA. omawlawi@mdanderson.org
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Since their introduction in 2001, PET/CT systems have gained wide acceptance primarily due to their inherent ability to combine functional and structural information about the underlying disease state of the patient in a single imaging session. Their significance has also been documented with regard to their short imaging times, which minimize patient anxiety and image blurring due to patient motion. In the past seven years, PET/CT systems have replaced dedicated PET systems as the imaging modality of choice for diagnostic evaluation of oncology patients. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this article is to review the evolution of PET/CT systems and document their current status. DISCUSSION: Recent improvements in instrumentation are highlighted together with some outstanding issues that arise for specific PET/CT applications. These are followed by a description of some of the more common clinical applications of PET/CT imaging such as staging malignant disease, treatment planning, and monitoring therapy response. Finally, the future developments of PET/CT systems with regard to sensitivity, resolution, and new radiopharmaceuticals are discussed. The article concludes by presenting some issues concerning the next stage in the future of PET imaging, namely PET/MRI.
INTRODUCTION: Since their introduction in 2001, PET/CT systems have gained wide acceptance primarily due to their inherent ability to combine functional and structural information about the underlying disease state of the patient in a single imaging session. Their significance has also been documented with regard to their short imaging times, which minimize patientanxiety and image blurring due to patient motion. In the past seven years, PET/CT systems have replaced dedicated PET systems as the imaging modality of choice for diagnostic evaluation of oncology patients. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this article is to review the evolution of PET/CT systems and document their current status. DISCUSSION: Recent improvements in instrumentation are highlighted together with some outstanding issues that arise for specific PET/CT applications. These are followed by a description of some of the more common clinical applications of PET/CT imaging such as staging malignant disease, treatment planning, and monitoring therapy response. Finally, the future developments of PET/CT systems with regard to sensitivity, resolution, and new radiopharmaceuticals are discussed. The article concludes by presenting some issues concerning the next stage in the future of PET imaging, namely PET/MRI.
Authors: Bernd J Pichler; Martin S Judenhofer; Ciprian Catana; Jeffrey H Walton; Manfred Kneilling; Robert E Nutt; Stefan B Siegel; Claus D Claussen; Simon R Cherry Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Walter Jentzen; Lutz Freudenberg; Ernst G Eising; Melanie Heinze; Wolfgang Brandau; Andreas Bockisch Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: P G. Kluetz; C C. Meltzer; V L. Villemagne; P E. Kinahan; S Chander; M A. Martinelli; D W. Townsend Journal: Clin Positron Imaging Date: 2000-11
Authors: Quinten C Black; Inga S Grills; Larry L Kestin; Ching-Yee O Wong; John W Wong; Alvaro A Martinez; Di Yan Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2004-11-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Kenneth J Biehl; Feng-Ming Kong; Farrokh Dehdashti; Jian-Yue Jin; Sasa Mutic; Issam El Naqa; Barry A Siegel; Jeffrey D Bradley Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: C Burger; G Goerres; S Schoenes; A Buck; A H R Lonn; G K Von Schulthess Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2002-04-19 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Se Young Chun; Timothy G Reese; Jinsong Ouyang; Bastien Guerin; Ciprian Catana; Xuping Zhu; Nathaniel M Alpert; Georges El Fakhri Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Arman Rahmim; Martin A Lodge; Nicolas A Karakatsanis; Vladimir Y Panin; Yun Zhou; Alan McMillan; Steve Cho; Habib Zaidi; Michael E Casey; Richard L Wahl Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-09-29 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Svetlana Balyasnikova; Johan Löfgren; Robin de Nijs; Yanna Zamogilnaya; Liselotte Højgaard; Barbara M Fischer Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-10-15