Literature DB >> 20084415

Fracture behavior of straight or angulated zirconia implant abutments supporting anterior single crowns.

Frank P Nothdurft1, Klaus E Doppler, Kurt J Erdelt, Andreas W Knauber, Peter R Pospiech.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of artificial aging on the fracture behavior of straight and angulated zirconia implant abutments (ZirDesign™; Astra Tech, Mölndal, Sweden) supporting anterior single crowns (SCs). Four different test groups (n = 8) representing anterior SCs were prepared. Groups 1 and 2 simulated a clinical situation with an ideal implant position (left central incisor) from a prosthetic point of view, which allows for the use of a straight, prefabricated zirconia abutment. Groups 3 and 4 simulated a situation with a compromised implant position, requiring an angulated (20°) abutment. OsseoSpeed™ implants (Astra Tech) 4.5 mm in diameter and 13 mm in length were used to support the abutments. The SCs (chromium cobalt alloy) were cemented with glass ionomer cement. Groups 2 and 4 were thermomechanically loaded (TCML = 1.2 × 10⁶; 10,000 × 5°/55°) and subjected to static loading until failure. Statistical analysis of force data at the fracture site was performed using nonparametric tests. All samples tested survived TCML. Artificial aging did not lead to a significant decrease in load-bearing capacity in either the groups with straight abutments or the groups with angulated abutments. The restorations that utilized angulated abutments exhibited higher fracture loads than the restorations with straight abutments (group 1, 280.25 ± 30.45 N; group 2, 268.88 ± 38.00 N; group 3, 355.00 ± 24.71 N; group 4, 320.71 ± 78.08 N). This difference in load-bearing performance between straight and angulated abutments was statistically significant (p = 0.000) only when no artificial aging was employed. The vast majority of the abutments fractured below the implant shoulder.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20084415     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-009-0377-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  30 in total

1.  Evolution of the concept of angulated abutments in implant dentistry: 14-year clinical data.

Authors:  Ashok Sethi; Thomas Kaus; Peter Sochor; Detlef Axmann-Krcmar; Manuel Chanavaz
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.454

2.  Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations after exposure to the artificial mouth.

Authors:  W Att; S Kurun; T Gerds; J R Strub
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.837

3.  Crestal bone loss around submerged and exposed unloaded dental implants: a radiographic and microbiological descriptive study.

Authors:  Eliane P Barboza; André Luis Caúla; Waldimir R Carvalho
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.454

4.  The mucosal barrier at implant abutments of different materials.

Authors:  Maria Welander; Ingemar Abrahamsson; Tord Berglundh
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 5.977

5.  The mucosal barrier following abutment dis/reconnection. An experimental study in dogs.

Authors:  I Abrahamsson; T Berglundh; J Lindhe
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 8.728

6.  In vivo fracture resistance of implant-supported all-ceramic restorations.

Authors:  Murat Yildirim; Horst Fischer; Rudolf Marx; Daniel Edelhoff
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  Fracture force of tooth-tooth- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures using titanium vs. customised zirconia implant abutments.

Authors:  Carola Kolbeck; Michael Behr; Martin Rosentritt; Gerhard Handel
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.977

8.  Randomized controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for canine and posterior single-tooth implant reconstructions: preliminary results at 1 year of function.

Authors:  Irena Sailer; Anja Zembic; Ronald Ernst Jung; David Siegenthaler; Claudia Holderegger; Christoph Hans Franz Hämmerle
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.977

9.  Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Roland Glauser; Irena Sailer; Arnold Wohlwend; Stephan Studer; Monica Schibli; Peter Schärer
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.681

10.  Fracture resistance of yttria-stabilized zirconia dental implant abutments.

Authors:  Nimet D Adatia; Stephen C Bayne; Lyndon F Cooper; Jeffery Y Thompson
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.752

View more
  7 in total

1.  Fracture behavior of zirconia implant abutments is influenced by superstructure-geometry.

Authors:  Frank P Nothdurft; Konrad Neumann; Andreas W Knauber
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Mechanical stability of angulated zirconia abutments supporting maxillary anterior single crowns on narrow-diameter implants.

Authors:  Ruiyang Ma; Ping Yu; Yuqiang Zhang; Chenyang Xie; Xin Tan; Jikui Sun; Haiyang Yu
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.606

3.  A further finite element stress analysis of angled abutments for an implant placed in the anterior maxilla.

Authors:  Dong Wu; Kebin Tian; Jiang Chen; Hua Jin; Wenxiu Huang; Yuyu Liu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 2.238

4.  Mechanical behavior of provisional implant prosthetic abutments.

Authors:  Rubén Agustín-Panadero; Blanca Serra-Pastor; Ana Roig-Vanaclocha; Juan-Luis Román-Rodriguez; Antonio Fons-Font
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2015-01-01

5.  Evaluation of stability of interface between CCM (Co-Cr-Mo) UCLA abutment and external hex implant.

Authors:  Ki-Joon Yoon; Young-Bum Park; Hyunmin Choi; Youngsung Cho; Jae-Hoon Lee; Keun-Woo Lee
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Comparing the Fracture Resistance and Modes of Failure in Different Types of CAD/CAM Zirconia Abutments with Internal Hexagonal Implants: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Yu-Tsen Chang; Yu-Ling Wu; Hung-Shyong Chen; Ming-Hsu Tsai; Chia-Chen Chang; Aaron Yu-Jen Wu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Comparisons of maximum deformation and failure forces at the implant-abutment interface of titanium implants between titanium-alloy and zirconia abutments with two levels of marginal bone loss.

Authors:  Chiung-Fang Wang; Heng-Li Huang; Dan-Jae Lin; Yen-Wen Shen; Lih-Jyh Fuh; Jui-Ting Hsu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 2.819

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.