Literature DB >> 24052252

Fracture behavior of zirconia implant abutments is influenced by superstructure-geometry.

Frank P Nothdurft1, Konrad Neumann, Andreas W Knauber.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of the superstructure-geometry on the fracture behavior of zirconia abutments (Compartis, DeguDent GmbH, Hanau, G).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four different groups (n = 8) representing anterior single crown replacement were prepared. In groups 1 and 2, the implants were restored with customized all-ceramic abutments and anatomically shaped crowns (chromium cobalt alloy). Groups 3 and 4 received crowns with a geometry according to the international standard ISO 14801 (dynamic fatigue test for endosseous dental implants) with a spherical contact area. Groups 2 and 4 were subjected to mechanical aging in a chewing simulator (50 N × 1,200,000 cycles). Static loading until fracture was performed using a universal testing device at an angle of 30° to the implant axis. Fracture patterns were analyzed using SEM.
RESULTS: In group 2, only one specimen survived mechanical aging. In group 4, one specimen fractured during the chewing simulation. Groups 1 and 2 showed significantly lower load-bearing capacity than groups 3 and 4. Artificial aging did not influence the fracture resistance. The SEM analysis revealed fatigue-related fracture patterns in those specimens, which failed during artificial aging.
CONCLUSIONS: Drawing conclusions from ISO testing concerning clinical performance appears to be critical as anatomic superstructure geometries induce different fracture behaviors. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: ISO testing of zirconia abutments should be accompanied by load-bearing capacity testing under simulated clinical conditions to predict clinical performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24052252     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-013-1111-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  25 in total

1.  Improving darkened anterior peri-implant tissue color with zirconia custom implant abutments.

Authors:  Arnold Watkin; Robert B Kerstein
Journal:  Compend Contin Educ Dent       Date:  2008-05

2.  The mucosal barrier at implant abutments of different materials.

Authors:  Maria Welander; Ingemar Abrahamsson; Tord Berglundh
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  Load fatigue performance of conical implant-abutment connections.

Authors:  Y L Seetoh; Keson B Tan; E K Chua; H C Quek; Jack I Nicholls
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Fracture strength after dynamic loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post-and-core systems.

Authors:  Guido Heydecke; Frank Butz; Amr Hussein; Jörg R Strub
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  Zirconium dioxide implant abutments for posterior single-tooth replacement: first results.

Authors:  Frank P Nothdurft; Peter R Pospiech
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.993

6.  In vivo fracture resistance of implant-supported all-ceramic restorations.

Authors:  Murat Yildirim; Horst Fischer; Rudolf Marx; Daniel Edelhoff
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Roland Glauser; Irena Sailer; Arnold Wohlwend; Stephan Studer; Monica Schibli; Peter Schärer
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.681

8.  Single tooth bite forces in healthy young adults.

Authors:  V F Ferrario; C Sforza; G Serrao; C Dellavia; G M Tartaglia
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.837

9.  Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Wael Att; Sirin Kurun; Thomas Gerds; Joerg R Strub
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  Fracture behaviour of implant-implant- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed dental prostheses utilising zirconium dioxide implant abutments.

Authors:  Frank Philipp Nothdurft; Sabine Merker; Peter Reinhard Pospiech
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  1 in total

1.  Analysis of Torque Maintenance and Fracture Resistance after Fatigue in Retention Screws Made of Different Metals for Screw-Retained Implant-Borne Prosthesis Joints.

Authors:  Maria Beatriz Bello Taborda; Gabriela Sumie Yaguinuma Gonçalves; Cecília Alves de Sousa; Wirley Gonçalves Assunção
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-11-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.