Literature DB >> 9266344

The mucosal barrier following abutment dis/reconnection. An experimental study in dogs.

I Abrahamsson1, T Berglundh, J Lindhe.   

Abstract

In the present experiment, the effect on the marginal peri-implant tissues following repeated abutment removal and subsequent reconnection was studied. 5 beagle dogs were used. The mandibular premolars were extracted and 2 fixtures of the Brånemark System were installed, 1 in each mandibular quadrant. 3 months later, abutment connection was performed. A 6-month period of plaque control was initiated. Once a month during the plaque control period, the abutment of the right side (test) in each dog was disconnected, cleaned and reconnected to the failure. Thus, each test abutment was removed and reconnected altogether 5x during this period. The contralateral abutment remained undisturbed for 6 months and served as control. 1 month after the last reconnection, the animals were sacrificed and tissue samples, comprising the implant and the surrounding soft and hard peri-implant tissues, were obtained, decalcified, embedded in Epon and sectioned. The following landmarks were identified and used for linear measurements: PM (the marginal portion of the peri-implant mucosa), aJE (the level of the apical termination of the junctional epithelium), B (the marginal level of bone to implant contact), A/F (the abutment/fixture border). The findings indicate that the dis- and subsequent reconnections of the abutment component of the implant compromised the mucosal barrier and resulted in a more "apically" positioned zone of connective tissue. The additional marginal bone resorption observed at the test sites following abutment manipulation may be the result of tissue reactions initiated to establish a proper "biological width" of the mucosal-implant barrier.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9266344     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1997.tb00230.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Periodontol        ISSN: 0303-6979            Impact factor:   8.728


  35 in total

1.  Resorption of labial bone in maxillary anterior implant.

Authors:  Young-Bum Cho; Seung-Jin Moon; Chae-Heon Chung; Hee-Jung Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 1.904

2.  Fracture behavior of straight or angulated zirconia implant abutments supporting anterior single crowns.

Authors:  Frank P Nothdurft; Klaus E Doppler; Kurt J Erdelt; Andreas W Knauber; Peter R Pospiech
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of platform switched implant.

Authors:  Se-Young Moon; Young-Jun Lim; Myung-Joo Kim; Ho-Beom Kwon
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  New technique for inter-implant papilla reconstruction between two or more implants in patients with variably reabsorbed ridges and flat anatomy. Preliminary results of a 9 consecutive clinical case series.

Authors:  R Tizzoni; M Tizzoni
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2010-11-19

Review 5.  Influence of subcrestal implant placement compared with equicrestal position on the peri-implant hard and soft tissues around platform-switched implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cristina Valles; Xavier Rodríguez-Ciurana; Marco Clementini; Mariana Baglivo; Blanca Paniagua; Jose Nart
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  A new method using insert-based systems (IBS) to improve cell behavior study on flexible and rigid biomaterials.

Authors:  Charlotte Grenade; Nicolas Moniotte; Eric Rompen; Alain Vanheusden; Amélie Mainjot; Marie-Claire De Pauw-Gillet
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.058

7.  Immediate definitive individualized abutments reduce peri-implant bone loss: a randomized controlled split-mouth study on 16 patients.

Authors:  M Erhan Çömlekoğlu; Nejat Nizam; Mine Dündar Çömlekoğlu
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  In vivo evaluation of quantitative percussion diagnostics for determining implant stability.

Authors:  Lindsey R VanSchoiack; Veronica I Shubayev; Robert R Myers; Cherilyn G Sheets; James C Earthman
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Peri-implantitis and the prosthodontist.

Authors:  A Dawood; B Marti Marti; S Tanner
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 1.626

10.  Fracture behaviour of implant-implant- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed dental prostheses utilising zirconium dioxide implant abutments.

Authors:  Frank Philipp Nothdurft; Sabine Merker; Peter Reinhard Pospiech
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.