Literature DB >> 12078599

Crestal bone loss around submerged and exposed unloaded dental implants: a radiographic and microbiological descriptive study.

Eliane P Barboza1, André Luis Caúla, Waldimir R Carvalho.   

Abstract

The successful maintenance of crestal bone surrounding dental implants is imperative for long-term implant success. Crestal bone loss is reportedly related to stress. However, early perforation and partial exposure of the implant's covering device are a focus for plaque accumulation, which, if left untreated, may result in inflammation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the crestal bone levels adjacent to submerged and exposed unloaded dental implants during the initial healing phase. In addition, the microbiota around exposed implants were studied. Bilateral implants were placed in the mandible of 10 patients. In one quadrant, the implants were covered by the flap. In the other quadrant, the flap was sutured, leaving the cover screws completely exposed. Standardized periapical radiographs were obtained at implant placement and 4 months later. Radiographs were digitalized, aligned, and analyzed with a computer-assisted method. Cultures were obtained from exposed implant sites. All patients showed more crestal bone loss around exposed dental implants compared to submerged implants. Prevotella sp., Streptococcus beta-hemoliticus, and Fusobacterium sp. were the microorganisms identified in most of the sites. The exposure of the implant covering device created foci for bacterial plaque accumulation, which may have facilitated periimplant crestal bone loss. The initial healing phase follow-up may be critical for implant success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12078599     DOI: 10.1097/00008505-200204000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Implant Dent        ISSN: 1056-6163            Impact factor:   2.454


  6 in total

1.  Fracture behavior of straight or angulated zirconia implant abutments supporting anterior single crowns.

Authors:  Frank P Nothdurft; Klaus E Doppler; Kurt J Erdelt; Andreas W Knauber; Peter R Pospiech
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Fracture behaviour of implant-implant- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed dental prostheses utilising zirconium dioxide implant abutments.

Authors:  Frank Philipp Nothdurft; Sabine Merker; Peter Reinhard Pospiech
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Bone remodeling around dental implants after 1-1.5 years of functional loading: A retrospective analysis of two-stage implants.

Authors:  Poyan Maghsoudi; Dagmar E Slot; Fridus G A van der Weijden
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2022-04-15

4.  Microscopical and chemical surface characterization of CAD/CAM zircona abutments after different cleaning procedures. A qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Peter Gehrke; Astrid Tabellion; Carsten Fischer
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 1.904

5.  The efficacy of convenient cleaning methods applicable for customized abutments: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Sunjai Kim; Changhun Choi; Yunsu Cha; Jae-Seung Chang
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  Occurrence and severity of spontaneous exposure of cover screw after dental implant placement.

Authors:  Ramin Negahdari; Arezou Ghoreishizadeh; Mohammad Ali Ghavimi; Atefeh Soltanpour; Sepideh Bohlouli
Journal:  J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent       Date:  2021-11-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.