Literature DB >> 20045887

What causes alternations in dominance during binocular rivalry?

Min-Suk Kang1, Randolph Blake.   

Abstract

Several mechanisms have been proposed to account for perceptual alterations during binocular rivalry, including neural adaptation and neural noise. However, the importance of neural adaptation for producing perceptual alterations has been challenged in several articles (Y.-J. Kim, Grabowecky, & Suzuki, 2006; Moreno-Bote, Rinzel, & Rubin, 2007). We devised an "online" adaptation procedure to reexamine the role of adaptation in binocular rivalry. Periods of adaptation inserted into rivalry observation periods parametrically alter the dynamics of rivalry such that increased adaptation duration decreases dominance duration, which cannot be accounted for by neural noise. Analysis of the average dominance durations and their variance (coefficient of variation) provides evidence for an increasingly important role of noise in rivalry alternations as a given dominance period continues in time, consistent with recent computational models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20045887      PMCID: PMC2811269          DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.1.179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  40 in total

1.  Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 2.  A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Carlo R Laing; Carson C Chow
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Adaptation to sine-wave gratings selectively reduces the contrast gain of the adapted stimuli.

Authors:  Debbie Y Dao; Zhong-Lin Lu; Barbara A Dosher
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Noise-induced alternations in an attractor network model of perceptual bistability.

Authors:  Rubén Moreno-Bote; John Rinzel; Nava Rubin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Enhancement of bistable perception associated with visual stimulus rivalry.

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-06

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?

Authors:  N K Logothetis; D A Leopold; D L Sheinberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-04-18       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Binocular rivalry is not chaotic.

Authors:  S R Lehky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1995-01-23       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Binocular rivalry: suppression depends on orientation and spatial frequency.

Authors:  M Fahle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The site of binocular rivalry suppression.

Authors:  R Blake; R Overton
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Multistability in auditory stream segregation: a predictive coding view.

Authors:  István Winkler; Susan Denham; Robert Mill; Tamás M Bohm; Alexandra Bendixen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Role of mutual inhibition in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Jeffrey Seely; Carson C Chow
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  A monocular contribution to stimulus rivalry.

Authors:  Jan Brascamp; Hansem Sohn; Sang-Hun Lee; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Individual peak gamma frequency predicts switch rate in perceptual rivalry.

Authors:  Jeremy D Fesi; Janine D Mendola
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Selective entrainment of brain oscillations drives auditory perceptual organization.

Authors:  Jordi Costa-Faidella; Elyse S Sussman; Carles Escera
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Modulation of spatiotemporal dynamics of binocular rivalry by collinear facilitation and pattern-dependent adaptation.

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang; Sang-Hun Lee; June Kim; David Heeger; Randolph Blake
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  The role of the primary visual cortex in perceptual suppression of salient visual stimuli.

Authors:  Georgios A Keliris; Nikos K Logothetis; Andreas S Tolias
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Genes contribute to the switching dynamics of bistable perception.

Authors:  Robert W Shannon; Christopher J Patrick; Yi Jiang; Edward Bernat; Sheng He
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Multistability in perception: binding sensory modalities, an overview.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Schwartz; Nicolas Grimault; Jean-Michel Hupé; Brian C J Moore; Daniel Pressnitzer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Slower rate of binocular rivalry in autism.

Authors:  Caroline E Robertson; Dwight J Kravitz; Jan Freyberg; Simon Baron-Cohen; Chris I Baker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.