Literature DB >> 24155303

Slower rate of binocular rivalry in autism.

Caroline E Robertson1, Dwight J Kravitz, Jan Freyberg, Simon Baron-Cohen, Chris I Baker.   

Abstract

An imbalance between cortical excitation and inhibition is a central component of many models of autistic neurobiology. We tested a potential behavioral footprint of this proposed imbalance using binocular rivalry, a visual phenomenon in which perceptual experience is thought to mirror the push and pull of excitatory and inhibitory cortical dynamics. In binocular rivalry, two monocularly presented images compete, leading to a percept that alternates between them. In a series of trials, we presented separate images of objects (e.g., a baseball and a broccoli) to each eye using a mirror stereoscope and asked human participants with autism and matched control subjects to continuously report which object they perceived, or whether they perceived a mixed percept. Individuals with autism demonstrated a slower rate of binocular rivalry alternations than matched control subjects, with longer durations of mixed percepts and an increased likelihood to revert to the previously perceived object when exiting a mixed percept. Critically, each of these findings was highly predictive of clinical measures of autistic symptomatology. Control "playback" experiments demonstrated that differences in neither response latencies nor response criteria could account for the atypical dynamics of binocular rivalry we observed in autistic spectrum conditions. Overall, these results may provide an index of atypical cortical dynamics that may underlie both the social and nonsocial symptoms of autism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24155303      PMCID: PMC3807027          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0448-13.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  40 in total

1.  The time course of binocular rivalry reveals a fundamental role of noise.

Authors:  Jan W Brascamp; Raymond van Ee; André J Noest; Richard H A H Jacobs; Albert V van den Berg
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  A substantial and unexpected enhancement of motion perception in autism.

Authors:  Jennifer H Foss-Feig; Duje Tadin; Kimberly B Schauder; Carissa J Cascio
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Spatial contrast sensitivity in adolescents with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Hwan Cui Koh; Elizabeth Milne; Karen Dobkins
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2010-08

4.  The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization.

Authors:  D L Sheinberg; N K Logothetis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Interneuron dysfunction in psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Oscar Marín
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 6.  A computational model for cerebral cortical dysfunction in autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Shashaank Vattikuti; Carson C Chow
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 13.382

7.  Normal binocular rivalry in autism: implications for the excitation/inhibition imbalance hypothesis.

Authors:  Christopher P Said; Ryan D Egan; Nancy J Minshew; Marlene Behrmann; David J Heeger
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  The relationship between sensory sensitivity and autistic traits in the general population.

Authors:  Ashley E Robertson; David R Simmons
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2013-04

9.  Balance between noise and adaptation in competition models of perceptual bistability.

Authors:  Asya Shpiro; Ruben Moreno-Bote; Nava Rubin; John Rinzel
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 1.621

10.  What causes alternations in dominance during binocular rivalry?

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  50 in total

1.  Binocular rivalry transitions predict inattention symptom severity in adult ADHD.

Authors:  Aiste Jusyte; Natalia Zaretskaya; Nina Maria Höhnle; Andreas Bartels; Michael Schönenberg
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 2.  Sensory perception in autism.

Authors:  Caroline E Robertson; Simon Baron-Cohen
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Frequency of alpha oscillation predicts individual differences in perceptual stability during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Sucharit Katyal; Sheng He; Bin He; Stephen A Engel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Neural cell adhesion molecule NrCAM regulates Semaphorin 3F-induced dendritic spine remodeling.

Authors:  Galina P Demyanenko; Vishwa Mohan; Xuying Zhang; Leann H Brennaman; Katherine E S Dharbal; Tracy S Tran; Paul B Manis; Patricia F Maness
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Scale-freeness of dominant and piecemeal perceptions during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Fatemeh Bakouie; Morteza Pishnamazi; Roxana Zeraati; Shahriar Gharibzadeh
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  Cholinergic Modulation of Binocular Vision.

Authors:  Yasha Sheynin; Pedro Rosa-Neto; Robert F Hess; Elvire Vaucher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  GABAergic Inhibition Gates Perceptual Awareness During Binocular Rivalry.

Authors:  Jeff Mentch; Alina Spiegel; Catherine Ricciardi; Caroline E Robertson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Larger extrastriate population receptive fields in autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  D Samuel Schwarzkopf; Elaine J Anderson; Benjamin de Haas; Sarah J White; Geraint Rees
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Perceptual, cognitive, and personality rigidity in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Mirella Díaz-Santos; Bo Cao; Arash Yazdanbakhsh; Daniel J Norton; Sandy Neargarder; Alice Cronin-Golomb
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  No difference in cross-modal attention or sensory discrimination thresholds in autism and matched controls.

Authors:  Sarah M Haigh; David J Heeger; Laurie M Heller; Akshat Gupta; Ilan Dinstein; Nancy J Minshew; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.