Literature DB >> 20884498

Modulation of spatiotemporal dynamics of binocular rivalry by collinear facilitation and pattern-dependent adaptation.

Min-Suk Kang1, Sang-Hun Lee, June Kim, David Heeger, Randolph Blake.   

Abstract

The role of collinear facilitation was investigated to test predictions of a model for traveling waves of dominance during binocular rivalry (H. Wilson, R. Blake, & S. Lee, 2001). In Experiment 1, we characterized traveling wave dynamics using a recently developed technique called periodic perturbation (M.-S. Kang, D. Heeger, & R. Blake, 2009). Results reveal that the propagation speed of waves for a collinear stimulus increased regardless of whether that stimulus was suppressed (replicating earlier work) or dominant; this latter finding is contrary to the model's prediction. In Experiment 2, we measured perceptual dominance durations within a localized region in the center of two rival stimuli that varied in degree of collinearity. Results reveal that increased collinearity did not change average dominance durations regardless of the rivalry phase of the stimulus, again contrary to the model's prediction. Incorporating pattern-dependent modulation of adaptation rate into the model accounted for results from both experiments. Using model simulations, we show how interactions between collinear facilitation and pattern-dependent adaptation may influence the dynamics of binocular rivalry. We also discuss alternative interpretations of our findings, including the possible role of surround suppression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20884498      PMCID: PMC2951267          DOI: 10.1167/10.11.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  48 in total

1.  Grouping visual features during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  D Alais; R Blake
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Measurement and modeling of center-surround suppression and enhancement.

Authors:  J Xing; D J Heeger
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Configuration saliency revealed in short duration binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Y Bonneh; D Sagi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex.

Authors:  D H HUBEL; T N WIESEL
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Contour interactions between pairs of Gabors engaged in binocular rivalry reveal a map of the association field.

Authors:  David Alais; Jean Lorenceau; Roberto Arrighi; John Cass
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Early and late mechanisms of surround suppression in striate cortex of macaque.

Authors:  Ben S Webb; Neel T Dhruv; Samuel G Solomon; Chris Tailby; Peter Lennie
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Adaptive center-surround interactions in human vision revealed during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Chris L E Paffen; Duje Tadin; Susan F te Pas; Randolph Blake; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Contour saliency in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Wu Li; Valentin Piëch; Charles D Gilbert
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Surround suppression in the early visual system.

Authors:  Matthew A Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Unraveling adaptation and mutual inhibition in perceptual rivalry.

Authors:  Martin J M Lankheet
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Neural field model of binocular rivalry waves.

Authors:  Paul C Bressloff; Matthew A Webber
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Individual peak gamma frequency predicts switch rate in perceptual rivalry.

Authors:  Jeremy D Fesi; Janine D Mendola
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Normal binocular rivalry in autism: implications for the excitation/inhibition imbalance hypothesis.

Authors:  Christopher P Said; Ryan D Egan; Nancy J Minshew; Marlene Behrmann; David J Heeger
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  An integrated framework of spatiotemporal dynamics of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Motion-induced blindness and Troxler fading: common and different mechanisms.

Authors:  Yoram S Bonneh; Tobias H Donner; Alexander Cooperman; David J Heeger; Dov Sagi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Evidence for neural rhythms embedded within binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Oakyoon Cha; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Adaptation to transients disrupts spatial coherence in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Marnix Naber; Sjoerd Stuit; Yentl De Kloe; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Chris L E Paffen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  On the Effects on Cortical Spontaneous Activity of the Symmetries of the Network of Pinwheels in Visual Area V1.

Authors:  Romain Veltz; Pascal Chossat; Olivier Faugeras
Journal:  J Math Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 1.300

9.  Autistic Traits Are Not a Strong Predictor of Binocular Rivalry Dynamics.

Authors:  Katie M Wykes; Laila Hugrass; David P Crewther
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.