Literature DB >> 21389101

Genes contribute to the switching dynamics of bistable perception.

Robert W Shannon1, Christopher J Patrick, Yi Jiang, Edward Bernat, Sheng He.   

Abstract

Ordinarily, the visual system provides an unambiguous representation of the world. However, at times alternative plausible interpretations of a given stimulus arise, resulting in a dynamic perceptual alternation of the differing interpretations, commonly referred to as bistable or rivalrous perception. Recent research suggests that common neural mechanisms may be involved in the dynamics of very different types of bistable phenomena. Further, evidence has emerged that genetic factors may be involved in determining the rate of switch for at least one form of bistable perception, known as binocular rivalry. The current study evaluated whether genetic factors contribute to the switching dynamics for distinctly different variants of bistable perception in the same participant sample. Switching rates were recorded for MZ and DZ twin participants in two different bistable perception tasks, binocular rivalry and the Necker Cube. Strong concordance in switching rates across both tasks was evident for MZ but not DZ twins, indicating that genetic factors indeed contribute to the dynamics of multiple forms of bistable perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21389101      PMCID: PMC3962018          DOI: 10.1167/11.3.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  13 in total

Review 1.  Visual competition.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures.

Authors:  Ming Meng; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Meditation alters perceptual rivalry in Tibetan Buddhist monks.

Authors:  O L Carter; D E Presti; C Callistemon; Y Ungerer; G B Liu; J D Pettigrew
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Attention speeds binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Chris L E Paffen; David Alais; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-09

5.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Ingested ethanol and binocular rivalry.

Authors:  M Donnelly; R J Miller
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Individual and interindividual differences in binocular retinal rivalry in man.

Authors:  M Aafjes; J E Hueting; P Visser
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Modulating the rate and rhythmicity of perceptual rivalry alternations with the mixed 5-HT2A and 5-HT1A agonist psilocybin.

Authors:  Olivia L Carter; John D Pettigrew; Felix Hasler; Guy M Wallis; Guang B Liu; Daniel Hell; Franz X Vollenweider
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.853

10.  Effects of selective 5-HT1A agonist tandospirone on the rate and rhythmicity of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Masanori Nagamine; Aihide Yoshino; Masaki Miyazaki; Yoshitomo Takahashi; Soichiro Nomura
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-04-12       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  15 in total

1.  Heritability of human visual contour integration-an integrated genomic study.

Authors:  Zijian Zhu; Biqing Chen; Ren Na; Wan Fang; Wenxia Zhang; Qin Zhou; Shanbi Zhou; Han Lei; Ailong Huang; Tingmei Chen; Dongsheng Ni; Yuping Gu; Jianing Liu; Yi Rao; Fang Fang
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Be still my heart: Cardiac regulation as a mode of uncertainty reduction.

Authors:  Andrew W Corcoran; Vaughan G Macefield; Jakob Hohwy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-03-23

3.  Frequency of alpha oscillation predicts individual differences in perceptual stability during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Sucharit Katyal; Sheng He; Bin He; Stephen A Engel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  A genome-wide association study reveals a substantial genetic basis underlying the Ebbinghaus illusion.

Authors:  Zijian Zhu; Biqing Chen; Ren Na; Wan Fang; Wenxia Zhang; Qin Zhou; Shanbi Zhou; Han Lei; Ailong Huang; Tingmei Chen; Dongsheng Ni; Yuping Gu; Jianing Liu; Yi Rao; Fang Fang
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 3.172

5.  Genomic Analyses of Visual Cognition: Perceptual Rivalry and Top-Down Control.

Authors:  Biqing Chen; Zijian Zhu; Ren Na; Wan Fang; Wenxia Zhang; Qin Zhou; Shanbi Zhou; Han Lei; Ailong Huang; Tingmei Chen; Dongsheng Ni; Yuping Gu; Jianing Liu; Fang Fang; Yi Rao
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Temporal patterns of saccadic eye movements predict individual variation in alternation rate during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Sarah Hancock; Lynn Gareze; John M Findlay; Timothy J Andrews
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-01-27

7.  An integrated framework of spatiotemporal dynamics of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Callosal connections of primary visual cortex predict the spatial spreading of binocular rivalry across the visual hemifields.

Authors:  Erhan Genç; Johanna Bergmann; Frank Tong; Randolph Blake; Wolf Singer; Axel Kohler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Attentional switching in humans and flies: rivalry in large and miniature brains.

Authors:  Steven Mark Miller; Trung Thanh Ngo; Bruno van Swinderen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 10.  Top-down influences on ambiguous perception: the role of stable and transient states of the observer.

Authors:  Lisa Scocchia; Matteo Valsecchi; Jochen Triesch
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.