Literature DB >> 16895456

Adaptation to sine-wave gratings selectively reduces the contrast gain of the adapted stimuli.

Debbie Y Dao1, Zhong-Lin Lu, Barbara A Dosher.   

Abstract

Adapting to sinusoidal gratings selectively reduces contrast sensitivity to subsequent test stimuli. To investigate the perceptual processes underlying selective adaptation, we developed an external noise plus adaptation paradigm and a theoretical framework based on a noisy observer model (the contrast-gain-control Perceptual Template Model [cgcPTM]). After adapting to a 45 deg, 2-Hz counter-flickering sine grating of 0.8 contrast, observers performed two-interval forced-choice detection of Gabors of matched spatial frequency, tilted at either 45 or 135 deg and embedded in one of six levels of white external noise (Experiment 1) or embedded in orientation band-pass-filtered external noise (Experiment 2). On the basis of the cgcPTM, we found that adaptation selectively reduced the contrast gain of the perceptual template at the adapted spatial frequency and orientation without altering either pre- or post-gain-control (additive and multiplicative) noises or changing transducer nonlinearity. Modeled as notches on the perceptual templates, the estimated full orientation bandwidth of adaptation at half height was about 8.3 deg.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16895456     DOI: 10.1167/6.7.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  10 in total

1.  Visual recovery in cortical blindness is limited by high internal noise.

Authors:  Matthew R Cavanaugh; Ruyuan Zhang; Michael D Melnick; Anasuya Das; Mariel Roberts; Duje Tadin; Marisa Carrasco; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  How do attention and adaptation affect contrast sensitivity?

Authors:  Franco Pestilli; Gerardo Viera; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The external noise normalized gain profile of spatial vision.

Authors:  Fang Hou; Zhong-Lin Lu; Chang-Bing Huang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Effects of surround suppression on response adaptation of V1 neurons to visual stimuli.

Authors:  Peng Li; Cai-Hong Jin; San Jiang; Miao-Miao Li; Zi-Lu Wang; Hui Zhu; Cui-Yun Chen; Tian-Miao Hua
Journal:  Dongwuxue Yanjiu       Date:  2014-09

Review 5.  Adaptation and visual coding.

Authors:  Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  What causes alternations in dominance during binocular rivalry?

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Occipital transcranial magnetic stimulation has an activity-dependent suppressive effect.

Authors:  Francesca Perini; Luigi Cattaneo; Marisa Carrasco; Jens V Schwarzbach
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Noise provides new insights on contrast sensitivity function.

Authors:  Ge Chen; Fang Hou; Fang-Fang Yan; Pan Zhang; Jie Xi; Yifeng Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu; Chang-Bing Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Developmental mechanisms underlying improved contrast thresholds for discriminations of orientation signals embedded in noise.

Authors:  Seong Taek Jeon; Daphne Maurer; Terri L Lewis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-08

10.  What Do Contrast Threshold Equivalent Noise Studies Actually Measure? Noise vs. Nonlinearity in Different Masking Paradigms.

Authors:  Alex S Baldwin; Daniel H Baker; Robert F Hess
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.