Literature DB >> 25271195

Individual peak gamma frequency predicts switch rate in perceptual rivalry.

Jeremy D Fesi1, Janine D Mendola.   

Abstract

Perceptual rivalry-the experience of alternation between two mutually exclusive interpretations of an ambiguous image-provides powerful opportunities to study conscious awareness. It is known that individual subjects experience perceptual alternations for various types of bistable stimuli at distinct rates, and this a stable, heritable trait. Also stable and heritable is the peak frequency of induced gamma-band (30-100 Hz) oscillation of a population-level response in occipital cortex to simple visual patterns, which has been established as a neural correlate of conscious processing. Interestingly, models for rivalry alternation rate and for the frequency of population-level oscillation have both cited inhibitory connections in cortex as crucial determinants of individual differences, and yet the relationship between these two variables has not yet been investigated. Here, we used magnetoencephalography to compare differences in alternation rate for binocular and monocular types of perceptual rivalry to differences in evoked and induced gamma-band frequency of neuromagnetic brain responses to simple nonrivalrous grating stimuli. For both types of bistable images, alternation rate was inversely correlated with the peak frequency of late evoked gamma activity in primary visual cortex (200-400 ms latency). Our results advance models of inhibition that account for subtle variation in normal visual cortex, and shed light on how small differences in anatomy and physiology relate to individual cognition and performance.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords:  binocular rivalry; bistability; gamma-band; individual differences; magnetoencephalography

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25271195      PMCID: PMC6869462          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  64 in total

1.  Temporal binding, binocular rivalry, and consciousness.

Authors:  A K Engel; P Fries; P König; M Brecht; W Singer
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  1999-06

2.  Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Bruce Fischl; André van der Kouwe; Christophe Destrieux; Eric Halgren; Florent Ségonne; David H Salat; Evelina Busa; Larry J Seidman; Jill Goldstein; David Kennedy; Verne Caviness; Nikos Makris; Bruce Rosen; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Cognitive functions of gamma-band activity: memory match and utilization.

Authors:  Christoph S Herrmann; Matthias H J Munk; Andreas K Engel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Binocular rivalry: competition and inhibition in visual perception.

Authors:  David Alais
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-05-18

5.  The frequency of visually induced γ-band oscillations depends on the size of early human visual cortex.

Authors:  D Samuel Schwarzkopf; David J Robertson; Chen Song; Gareth R Barnes; Geraint Rees
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Binocular rivalry reveals a dissociation between the subjective experience and induced gamma oscillations.

Authors:  Scott L Fairhall; Jeff P Hamm; Ian J Kirk
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 7.  Gamma-band responses in the brain: a short review of psychophysiological correlates and functional significance.

Authors:  C Başar-Eroglu; D Strüber; M Schürmann; M Stadler; E Başar
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.997

8.  What causes alternations in dominance during binocular rivalry?

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Resting GABA and glutamate concentrations do not predict visual gamma frequency or amplitude.

Authors:  Helena Cousijn; Saskia Haegens; George Wallis; Jamie Near; Mark G Stokes; Paul J Harrison; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Elevating endogenous GABA levels with GAT-1 blockade modulates evoked but not induced responses in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Suresh D Muthukumaraswamy; Jim F M Myers; Sue J Wilson; David J Nutt; Khalid Hamandi; Anne Lingford-Hughes; Krish D Singh
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 7.853

View more
  4 in total

1.  Frequency of alpha oscillation predicts individual differences in perceptual stability during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Sucharit Katyal; Sheng He; Bin He; Stephen A Engel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  No effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on visual evoked potential and peak gamma frequency.

Authors:  A Bin Dawood; A Dickinson; A Aytemur; E Milne; M Jones
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2022-01-31

3.  Dissociable Neural Information Dynamics of Perceptual Integration and Differentiation during Bistable Perception.

Authors:  Andrés Canales-Johnson; Alexander J Billig; Francisco Olivares; Andrés Gonzalez; María Del Carmen Garcia; Walter Silva; Esteban Vaucheret; Carlos Ciraolo; Ezequiel Mikulan; Agustín Ibanez; David Huepe; Valdas Noreika; Srivas Chennu; Tristan A Bekinschtein
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Fast cyclic stimulus flashing modulates perception of bi-stable figure.

Authors:  Henrikas Vaitkevicius; Vygandas Vanagas; Alvydas Soliunas; Algimantas Svegzda; Remigijus Bliumas; Rytis Stanikunas; Janus J Kulikowski
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 2.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.