Literature DB >> 11932559

A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry.

Carlo R Laing1, Carson C Chow.   

Abstract

We present a biologically plausible model of binocular rivalry consisting of a network of Hodgkin-Huxley type neurons. Our model accounts for the experimentally and psychophysically observed phenomena: (1) it reproduces the distribution of dominance durations seen in both humans and primates, (2) it exhibits a lack of correlation between lengths of successive dominance durations, (3) variation of stimulus strength to one eye influences only the mean dominance duration of the contralateral eye, not the mean dominance duration of the ipsilateral eye, (4) increasing both stimuli strengths in parallel decreases the mean dominance durations. We have also derived a reduced population rate model from our spiking model from which explicit expressions for the dependence of the dominance durations on input strengths are analytically calculated. We also use this reduced model to derive an expression for the distribution of dominance durations seen within an individual.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11932559     DOI: 10.1023/a:1014942129705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Neurosci        ISSN: 0929-5313            Impact factor:   1.621


  36 in total

1.  Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Dynamics of travelling waves in visual perception.

Authors:  H R Wilson; R Blake; S H Lee
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-30       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A physiological model of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  T J Mueller
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.241

4.  When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  I Kovács; T V Papathomas; M Yang; A Fehér
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-12-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A fresh look at the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  T J Mueller; R Blake
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  Neuronal correlates of subjective visual perception.

Authors:  N K Logothetis; J D Schall
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-08-18       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?

Authors:  N K Logothetis; D A Leopold; D L Sheinberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-04-18       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Timing and competition in networks representing ambiguous figures.

Authors:  C Gómez; E D Argandoña; R G Solier; J C Angulo; M Vázquez
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Binocular rivalry is not chaotic.

Authors:  S R Lehky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1995-01-23       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Why do ambiguous figures reverse?

Authors:  I Rock; S Hall; J Davis
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1994-10
View more
  108 in total

1.  Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision.

Authors:  Hugh R Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mechanisms for Frequency Control in Neuronal Competition Models.

Authors:  Rodica Curtu; Asya Shpiro; Nava Rubin; John Rinzel
Journal:  SIAM J Appl Dyn Syst       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.316

3.  Networks that learn the precise timing of event sequences.

Authors:  Alan Veliz-Cuba; Harel Z Shouval; Krešimir Josić; Zachary P Kilpatrick
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Mathematical Frameworks for Oscillatory Network Dynamics in Neuroscience.

Authors:  Peter Ashwin; Stephen Coombes; Rachel Nicks
Journal:  J Math Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 1.300

Review 5.  Are there interactive processes in speech perception?

Authors:  James L McClelland; Daniel Mirman; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 6.  Inertia and memory in ambiguous visual perception.

Authors:  J B Gao; V A Billock; I Merk; W W Tung; K D White; J G Harris; V P Roychowdhury
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2006-02-28

7.  Dynamical characteristics common to neuronal competition models.

Authors:  Asya Shpiro; Rodica Curtu; John Rinzel; Nava Rubin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Noise-induced alternations in an attractor network model of perceptual bistability.

Authors:  Rubén Moreno-Bote; John Rinzel; Nava Rubin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Brain mechanisms for simple perception and bistable perception.

Authors:  Megan Wang; Daniel Arteaga; Biyu J He
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Bi-stable depth ordering of superimposed moving gratings.

Authors:  Rubén Moreno-Bote; Asya Shpiro; John Rinzel; Nava Rubin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.