Literature DB >> 7700878

Binocular rivalry is not chaotic.

S R Lehky1.   

Abstract

Time series of the durations each eye was dominant during binocular rivalry were obtained psychophysically. The oscillations showed an adaptation effect with mean and standard deviations of rivalry dominance durations increasing as a square root function of time over the course of a trial. The data were corrected for this non-stationarity. Dominance durations had a log-normal probability distribution and the autocorrelation function revealed no short term correlations in the time series. In an attempt to distinguish whether the variability of durations was due to a deterministic, low-dimensional chaotic attractor or to a stochastic process, the data were subjected to two tests. The first was calculation of correlation dimensions and the second was nonlinear forecasting of the time series. Both tests included comparisons with randomized 'surrogate data' as controls. In neither case was there a large difference between test results for actual data and surrogate data. We conclude that chaos is not a major factor underlying variability in binocular rivalry.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7700878     DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  32 in total

Review 1.  A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Carlo R Laing; Carson C Chow
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Right parietal brain activity precedes perceptual alternation during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Juliane Britz; Michael A Pitts; Christoph M Michel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Inertia and memory in ambiguous visual perception.

Authors:  J B Gao; V A Billock; I Merk; W W Tung; K D White; J G Harris; V P Roychowdhury
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2006-02-28

4.  Noise-induced alternations in an attractor network model of perceptual bistability.

Authors:  Rubén Moreno-Bote; John Rinzel; Nava Rubin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Neural substrates of perceptual integration during bistable object perception.

Authors:  Anastasia V Flevaris; Antigona Martínez; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 6.  Single units and conscious vision.

Authors:  N K Logothetis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Role of mutual inhibition in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Jeffrey Seely; Carson C Chow
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Bifurcation study of a neural field competition model with an application to perceptual switching in motion integration.

Authors:  J Rankin; A I Meso; G S Masson; O Faugeras; P Kornprobst
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 1.621

9.  Size matters: a study of binocular rivalry dynamics.

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Binaral rivalry between the nostrils and in the cortex.

Authors:  Wen Zhou; Denise Chen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.