Literature DB >> 20033599

A pilot study of architectural distortion detection in mammograms based on characteristics of line shadows.

Mitsutaka Nemoto1, Soshi Honmura, Akinobu Shimizu, Daisuke Furukawa, Hidefumi Kobatake, Shigeru Nawano.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We present herein a novel algorithm for architectural distortion detection that utilizes the point convergence index with the likelihood of lines (e.g., spiculations) relating to architectural distortion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Validation was performed using 25 computed radiography (CR) mammograms, each of which has an architectural distortion with radiating spiculations. The proposed method comprises five steps. First, the lines were extracted on mammograms, such as spiculations of architectural distortion as well as lines in the mammary gland. Second, the likelihood of spiculation for each extracted line was calculated. In the third step, point convergence index weighted by this likelihood was evaluated at each pixel to enhance distortion only. Fourth, local maxima of the index were extracted as candidates for the distortion, then classified based on nine features in the last step.
RESULTS: Point convergence index without the proposed likelihood generated 84.48/image false-positives (FPs) on average. Conversely, the proposed index succeeded in decreasing this number to 12.48/image on average when sensitivity was 100%. After the classification step, number of FPs was reduced to 0.80/image with 80.0% sensitivity.
CONCLUSION: Combination of the likelihood of lines with point convergence index is effective in extracting architectural distortion with radiating spiculations.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 20033599     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-008-0267-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  13 in total

1.  Model-based detection of spiculated lesions in mammograms.

Authors:  R Zwiggelaar; T C Parr; J E Schumm; I W Hutt; C J Taylor; S M Astley; C R Boggis
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Computer-aided detection (CAD) in screening mammography: sensitivity of commercial CAD systems for detecting architectural distortion.

Authors:  Jay A Baker; Eric L Rosen; Joseph Y Lo; Edgardo I Gimenez; Ruth Walsh; Mary Scott Soo
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Computer-aided detection and diagnosis at the start of the third millennium.

Authors:  Bradley J Erickson; Brian Bartholmai
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  A study on the computerized fractal analysis of architectural distortion in screening mammograms.

Authors:  Georgia D Tourassi; David M Delong; Carey E Floyd
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Is mammographic spiculation an independent, good prognostic factor in screening-detected invasive breast cancer?

Authors:  Andrew J Evans; Sarah E Pinder; Jonathan J James; Ian O Ellis; Eleanor Cornford
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  An automatic method to discriminate malignant masses from normal tissue in digital mammograms.

Authors:  G M te Brake; N Karssemeijer; J H Hendriks
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions.

Authors:  W P Kegelmeyer; J M Pruneda; P D Bourland; A Hillis; M W Riggs; M L Nipper
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Screening interval breast cancers: mammographic features and prognosis factors.

Authors:  H C Burrell; D M Sibbering; A R Wilson; S E Pinder; A J Evans; L J Yeoman; C W Elston; I O Ellis; R W Blamey; J F Robertson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  8 in total

1.  Measures of angular spread and entropy for the detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms.

Authors:  Shantanu Banik; Rangaraj M Rangayyan; J E Leo Desautels
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms via analysis of oriented patterns.

Authors:  Rangaraj M Rangayyan; Shantanu Banik; J E Leo Desautels
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Characterizing Architectural Distortion in Mammograms by Linear Saliency.

Authors:  Fabián Narváez; Jorge Alvarez; Juan D Garcia-Arteaga; Jonathan Tarquino; Eduardo Romero
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Measures of divergence of oriented patterns for the detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms.

Authors:  Rangaraj M Rangayyan; Shantanu Banik; Jayasree Chakraborty; Sudipta Mukhopadhyay; J E Leo Desautels
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Computer-aided detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms of interval cancer.

Authors:  Rangaraj M Rangayyan; Shantanu Banik; J E Leo Desautels
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Heterogeneity of focal breast lesions and surrounding tissue assessed by mammographic texture analysis: preliminary evidence of an association with tumor invasion and estrogen receptor status.

Authors:  Balaji Ganeshan; Olga Strukowska; Karoline Skogen; Rupert Young; Chris Chatwin; Ken Miles
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Evaluation of the Combination of Artificial Intelligence and Radiologist Assessments to Interpret Malignant Architectural Distortion on Mammography.

Authors:  Yun Wan; Yunfei Tong; Yuanyuan Liu; Yan Huang; Guoyan Yao; Daniel Q Chen; Bo Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 5.738

8.  A Novel Fusion-Based Texture Descriptor to Improve the Detection of Architectural Distortion in Digital Mammography.

Authors:  Osmando Pereira Junior; Helder Cesar Rodrigues Oliveira; Carolina Toledo Ferraz; José Hiroki Saito; Marcelo Andrade da Costa Vieira; Adilson Gonzaga
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 4.056

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.