Literature DB >> 11049175

An automatic method to discriminate malignant masses from normal tissue in digital mammograms.

G M te Brake1, N Karssemeijer, J H Hendriks.   

Abstract

Specificity levels of automatic mass detection methods in mammography are generally rather low, because suspicious looking normal tissue is often hard to discriminate from real malignant masses. In this work a number of features were defined that are related to image characteristics that radiologists use to discriminate real lesions from normal tissue. An artificial neural network was used to map the computed features to a measure of suspiciousness for each region that was found suspicious by a mass detection method. Two data sets were used to test the method. The first set of 72 malignant cases (132 films) was a consecutive series taken from the Nijmegen screening programme, 208 normal films were added to improve the estimation of the specificity of the method. The second set was part of the new DDSM data set from the University of South Florida. A total of 193 cases (772 films) with 372 annotated malignancies was used. The measure of suspiciousness that was computed using the image characteristics was successful in discriminating tumours from false positive detections. Approximately 75% of all cancers were detected in at least one view at a specificity level of 0.1 false positive per image.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11049175     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/10/308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  16 in total

Review 1.  Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM.

Authors:  Maryellen L Giger; Heang-Ping Chan; John Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A pilot study of architectural distortion detection in mammograms based on characteristics of line shadows.

Authors:  Mitsutaka Nemoto; Soshi Honmura; Akinobu Shimizu; Daisuke Furukawa; Hidefumi Kobatake; Shigeru Nawano
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Classification of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) images.

Authors:  Shaked Perek; Nahum Kiryati; Gali Zimmerman-Moreno; Miri Sklair-Levy; Eli Konen; Arnaldo Mayer
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Can the spherical gold standards be used as an alternative to painted gold standards for the computerized detection of lesions using voxel-based classification?

Authors:  Yukihiro Nomura; Naoto Hayashi; Shouhei Hanaoka; Tomomi Takenaga; Mitsutaka Nemoto; Soichiro Miki; Takeharu Yoshikawa; Osamu Abe
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  A new and fast image feature selection method for developing an optimal mammographic mass detection scheme.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Jiantao Pu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  Needs assessment for next generation computer-aided mammography reference image databases and evaluation studies.

Authors:  Alexander Horsch; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Matthias Elter
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Applying Quantitative CT Image Feature Analysis to Predict Response of Ovarian Cancer Patients to Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Gopichandh Danala; Theresa Thai; Camille C Gunderson; Katherine M Moxley; Kathleen Moore; Robert S Mannel; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng; Yuchen Qiu
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses using visually sensitive image features.

Authors:  Yunzhi Wang; Faranak Aghaei; Ali Zarafshani; Yuchen Qiu; Wei Qian; Bin Zheng
Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.535

9.  Optimization of breast mass classification using sequential forward floating selection (SFFS) and a support vector machine (SVM) model.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Jiantao Pu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.924

10.  Enhanced CellClassifier: a multi-class classification tool for microscopy images.

Authors:  Benjamin Misselwitz; Gerhard Strittmatter; Balamurugan Periaswamy; Markus C Schlumberger; Samuel Rout; Peter Horvath; Karol Kozak; Wolf-Dietrich Hardt
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.