Literature DB >> 20127270

Computer-aided detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms of interval cancer.

Rangaraj M Rangayyan1, Shantanu Banik, J E Leo Desautels.   

Abstract

Architectural distortion is an important sign of breast cancer, but because of its subtlety, it is a common cause of false-negative findings on screening mammograms. This paper presents methods for the detection of architectural distortion in mammograms of interval cancer cases taken prior to the detection of breast cancer using Gabor filters, phase portrait analysis, fractal analysis, and texture analysis. The methods were used to detect initial candidates for sites of architectural distortion in prior mammograms of interval cancer and also normal control cases. A total of 4,224 regions of interest (ROIs) were automatically obtained from 106 prior mammograms of 56 interval cancer cases, including 301 ROIs related to architectural distortion, and from 52 prior mammograms of 13 normal cases. For each ROI, the fractal dimension and Haralick's texture features were computed. Feature selection was performed separately using stepwise logistic regression and stepwise regression. The best results achieved, in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, with the features selected by stepwise logistic regression are 0.76 with the Bayesian classifier, 0.73 with Fisher linear discriminant analysis, 0.77 with an artificial neural network based on radial basis functions, and 0.77 with a support vector machine. Analysis of the performance of the methods with free-response receiver operating characteristics indicated a sensitivity of 0.80 at 7.6 false positives per image. The methods have good potential in detecting architectural distortion in mammograms of interval cancer cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20127270      PMCID: PMC3046672          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-009-9257-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  45 in total

1.  Feature selection and classifier performance in computer-aided diagnosis: the effect of finite sample size.

Authors:  B Sahiner; H P Chan; N Petrick; R F Wagner; L Hadjiiski
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Analysis of asymmetry in mammograms via directional filtering with Gabor wavelets.

Authors:  R J Ferrari; R M Rangayyan; J E Desautels; A F Frère
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  On the comparison of FROC curves in mammography CAD systems.

Authors:  Hans Bornefalk; Anna Bornefalk Hermansson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Use of prior mammograms in the classification of benign and malignant masses.

Authors:  Celia Varela; Nico Karssemeijer; Jan H C L Hendriks; Roland Holland
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Classification of breast masses in mammograms using genetic programming and feature selection.

Authors:  R J Nandi; A K Nandi; R M Rangayyan; D Scutt
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  A pilot study of architectural distortion detection in mammograms based on characteristics of line shadows.

Authors:  Mitsutaka Nemoto; Soshi Honmura; Akinobu Shimizu; Daisuke Furukawa; Hidefumi Kobatake; Shigeru Nawano
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Reassessment of breast cancers missed during routine screening mammography: a community-based study.

Authors:  B C Yankaskas; M J Schell; R E Bird; D A Desrochers
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Missed breast carcinoma: pitfalls and pearls.

Authors:  Aneesa S Majid; Ellen Shaw de Paredes; Richard D Doherty; Neil R Sharma; Xavier Salvador
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

9.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography.

Authors:  R E Bird; T W Wallace; B C Yankaskas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Screening interval breast cancers: mammographic features and prognosis factors.

Authors:  H C Burrell; D M Sibbering; A R Wilson; S E Pinder; A J Evans; L J Yeoman; C W Elston; I O Ellis; R W Blamey; J F Robertson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  18 in total

1.  Measures of angular spread and entropy for the detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms.

Authors:  Shantanu Banik; Rangaraj M Rangayyan; J E Leo Desautels
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms via analysis of oriented patterns.

Authors:  Rangaraj M Rangayyan; Shantanu Banik; J E Leo Desautels
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Characterization of Architectural Distortion in Mammograms Based on Texture Analysis Using Support Vector Machine Classifier with Clinical Evaluation.

Authors:  Amit Kamra; V K Jain; Sukhwinder Singh; Sunil Mittal
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Characterizing Architectural Distortion in Mammograms by Linear Saliency.

Authors:  Fabián Narváez; Jorge Alvarez; Juan D Garcia-Arteaga; Jonathan Tarquino; Eduardo Romero
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  Measures of divergence of oriented patterns for the detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms.

Authors:  Rangaraj M Rangayyan; Shantanu Banik; Jayasree Chakraborty; Sudipta Mukhopadhyay; J E Leo Desautels
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Automatic detection of the nipple in screen-film and full-field digital mammograms using a novel Hessian-based method.

Authors:  Paola Casti; Arianna Mencattini; Marcello Salmeri; Antonietta Ancona; Fabio Felice Mangieri; Maria Luisa Pepe; Rangaraj Mandayam Rangayyan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  MRI in the differential diagnosis of primary architectural distortion detected by mammography.

Authors:  Lifang Si; Renyou Zhai; Xiaojuan Liu; Kaiyan Yang; Li Wang; Tao Jiang
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.630

8.  Supervised Learning Occurs in Visual Perceptual Learning of Complex Natural Images.

Authors:  Sebastian M Frank; Andrea Qi; Daniela Ravasio; Yuka Sasaki; Eric L Rosen; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  A novel image toggle tool for comparison of serial mammograms: automatic density normalization and alignment-development of the tool and initial experience.

Authors:  Satoshi Honda; Hiroko Tsunoda; Wataru Fukuda; Yukihisa Saida
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 2.374

10.  Developing a new case based computer-aided detection scheme and an adaptive cueing method to improve performance in detecting mammographic lesions.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Faranak Aghaei; Yunzhi Wang; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.