Literature DB >> 8638010

Screening interval breast cancers: mammographic features and prognosis factors.

H C Burrell1, D M Sibbering, A R Wilson, S E Pinder, A J Evans, L J Yeoman, C W Elston, I O Ellis, R W Blamey, J F Robertson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To review the mammographic features of screening interval breast cancers and to compare the tumor size, histologic grade, and lymph node involvement with those in screening-detected and unscreened symptomatic cancers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Screening mammography was performed in 72,773 women aged 50-64 years. Ninety interval cancers were identified in 89 women. The mammographic and histopathologic features of these cancers were analyzed.
RESULTS: At review of the screening mammograms, interval cancers were classified into four groups: 51 true-positive, 20 false-negative, seven mammographically occult, and 12 unclassified. The most common missed abnormality in the false-negative cases was architectural distortion. Interval cancers were larger, of higher grade, and more likely to have lymph node involvement than screening-detected tumors and were of similar size, histologic grade, and stage of lymph node involvement as symptomatic tumors.
CONCLUSION: Prognosis in interval cancers is similar to that in symptomatic, unscreened tumors and statistically significantly worse than that in screening-detected cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8638010     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.199.3.8638010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  26 in total

1.  Gabor filters and phase portraits for the detection of architectural distortion in mammograms.

Authors:  Rangaraj M Rangayyan; Fábio J Ayres
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the detection of architectural distortion.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Dibble; Ana P Lourenco; Grayson L Baird; Robert C Ward; A Stanley Maynard; Martha B Mainiero
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Number of mammography cases read per year is a strong predictor of sensitivity.

Authors:  Wasfi I Suleiman; Sarah J Lewis; Dianne Georgian-Smith; Michael G Evanoff; Mark F McEntee
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-05-07

4.  A pilot study of architectural distortion detection in mammograms based on characteristics of line shadows.

Authors:  Mitsutaka Nemoto; Soshi Honmura; Akinobu Shimizu; Daisuke Furukawa; Hidefumi Kobatake; Shigeru Nawano
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Characterization and classification of tumor lesions using computerized fractal-based texture analysis and support vector machines in digital mammograms.

Authors:  Qi Guo; Jiaqing Shao; Virginie F Ruiz
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 6.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Concepts and Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Alice Chong; Susan P Weinstein; Elizabeth S McDonald; Emily F Conant
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Differences between screen-detected and interval breast cancers among BRCA mutation carriers.

Authors:  Melissa Pilewskie; Emily C Zabor; Elizabeth Gilbert; Michelle Stempel; Oriana Petruolo; Debra Mangino; Mark Robson; Maxine S Jochelson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  MRI in the differential diagnosis of primary architectural distortion detected by mammography.

Authors:  Lifang Si; Renyou Zhai; Xiaojuan Liu; Kaiyan Yang; Li Wang; Tao Jiang
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.630

9.  Conspicuity of breast cancer according to histopathological type and breast density when imaged by full-field digital mammography compared with screen-film mammography.

Authors:  Katja Pinker; Nicholas Perry; S Vinnicombe; S Shiel; M Weber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Radiologic findings of screen-detected cancers in an organized population-based screening mammography program in Turkey.

Authors:  Arda Kayhan; Erkin Arıbal; Cennet Şahin; Ömür Can Taşçı; Sibel Özkan Gürdal; Enis Öztürk; Hayat Halide Hatipoğlu; Nilüfer Özaydın; Neslihan Cabioğlu; Beyza Özçınar; Vahit Özmen
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.630

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.