Literature DB >> 17056932

Is mammographic spiculation an independent, good prognostic factor in screening-detected invasive breast cancer?

Andrew J Evans1, Sarah E Pinder, Jonathan J James, Ian O Ellis, Eleanor Cornford.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to review the prognostic significance of pathologic and radiologic factors for screening-detected invasive breast cancers of any size.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patient group was a consecutive series of 470 screening-detected invasive breast cancers that were diagnosed between 1988 and 1998. Data regarding tumor type, grade, maximum invasive diameter, lymph node status, and the presence or absence of vascular invasion were recorded, as were the mammographic features of the lesion. Survival was ascertained from hospital records and a cancer registry. Differences in survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves with a log-rank test for difference. The significance of any correlations was assessed using the chi-square test and the chi-square test for trend. Multivariate analysis used a Cox proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: At univariate analysis, large invasive size, the presence of definite vascular invasion, high histologic grade, and nodal involvement were associated with poorer breast-cancer-specific survival. Mammographic spiculation (the presence of either a spiculated mass or distortion) was associated with more prolonged breast-cancer-specific survival. The presence or absence of mammographic comedo calcification did not influence breast-cancer-specific survival. In a Cox multivariate analysis that included those factors significant in univariate analysis, size, grade, nodal stage, and mammographic spiculation maintained their prognostic significance.
CONCLUSION: Mammographic spiculation is an independent, good prognostic factor for screening-detected invasive breast cancer. The mechanism of how mammographic spiculation confers a beneficial prognostic effect is not clear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17056932     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.0725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  15 in total

1.  A pilot study of architectural distortion detection in mammograms based on characteristics of line shadows.

Authors:  Mitsutaka Nemoto; Soshi Honmura; Akinobu Shimizu; Daisuke Furukawa; Hidefumi Kobatake; Shigeru Nawano
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Correlation between mammographic and sonographic findings and prognostic factors in patients with node-negative invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  H J Shin; H H Kim; M O Huh; M J Kim; A Yi; H Kim; B H Son; S H Ahn
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  A retrospective review of MRI features associated with metastasis-free survival in women with breast cancer: focusing on skin thickening and skin enhancement.

Authors:  Valentine Mberu; Jennifer McFarlane; E Jane Macaskill; Andrew Evans
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Sonographic correlations with the new molecular classification of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  I T H Au-Yong; A J Evans; S Taneja; E A Rakha; A R Green; C Paish; I O Ellis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Correlation between three-dimensional ultrasound features and pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jun Jiang; Ya-qing Chen; Yi-zhuan Xu; Ming-li Chen; Yun-kai Zhu; Wen-bin Guan; Xiao-jin Wang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  The association between mammographic calcifications and breast cancer prognostic factors in a population-based registry cohort.

Authors:  Sarah J Nyante; Sheila S Lee; Thad S Benefield; Tiffany N Hoots; Louise M Henderson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Correlation of mammographic calcifications with Her-2/neu overexpression in primary breast carcinomas.

Authors:  X Wang; L Chao; L Chen; B Tian; G Ma; Y Zang; M Hua; J Sun
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Microcalcifications in breast cancer: novel insights into the molecular mechanism and functional consequence of mammary mineralisation.

Authors:  R F Cox; A Hernandez-Santana; S Ramdass; G McMahon; J H Harmey; M P Morgan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Breast cancer stromal elastosis is associated with mammography screening detection, low Ki67 expression and favourable prognosis in a population-based study.

Authors:  Ying Chen; Tor A Klingen; Elisabeth Wik; Hans Aas; Einar Vigeland; Knut Liestøl; Øystein Garred; Jan Mæhlen; Lars A Akslen; Jon Lømo
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.644

10.  Imaging Predictors for Nonsentinel Lymph Node Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Yizi Cong; Suxia Wang; Haidong Zou; Shiguang Zhu; Xingmiao Wang; Jianqiao Cao; Ji Wang; Yanqing Liu; Guangdong Qiao
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.