Literature DB >> 28005248

Characterizing Architectural Distortion in Mammograms by Linear Saliency.

Fabián Narváez1, Jorge Alvarez1, Juan D Garcia-Arteaga1, Jonathan Tarquino1, Eduardo Romero2.   

Abstract

Architectural distortion (AD) is a common cause of false-negatives in mammograms. This lesion usually consists of a central retraction of the connective tissue and a spiculated pattern radiating from it. This pattern is difficult to detect due the complex superposition of breast tissue. This paper presents a novel AD characterization by representing the linear saliency in mammography Regions of Interest (ROI) as a graph composed of nodes corresponding to locations along the ROI boundary and edges with a weight proportional to the line intensity integrals along the path connecting any pair of nodes. A set of eigenvectors from the adjacency matrix is then used to extract discriminant coefficients that represent those nodes with higher salient lines. A dimensionality reduction is further accomplished by selecting the pair of nodes with major contribution for each of the computed eigenvectors. The set of main salient lines is then assembled as a feature vector that inputs a conventional Support Vector Machine (SVM). Experimental results with two benchmark databases, the mini-MIAS and DDSM databases, demonstrate that the proposed linear saliency domain method (LSD) performs well in terms of accuracy. The approach was evaluated with a set of 246 RoI extracted from the DDSM (123 normal tissues and 123 AD) and a set of 38 ROI from the mini-MIAS collections (19 normal tissues and 19 AD) respectively. The classification results showed respectively for both databases an accuracy rate of 89 % and 87 %, a sensitivity rate of 85 % and 95 %, and a specificity rate of 93 % and 84 %. Likewise, the area under curve (A z ) of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.93 for both databases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Architectural distortion; Breast spiculated lesions; Linear saliency; Mammography

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28005248     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-016-0672-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  22 in total

1.  Linear structures in mammographic images: detection and classification.

Authors:  Reyer Zwiggelaar; Susan M Astley; Caroline R M Boggis; Christopher J Taylor
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Random walks on graphs for salient object detection in images.

Authors:  Viswanath Gopalakrishnan; Yiqun Hu; Deepu Rajan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 10.856

3.  An automated method for detecting architectural distortions on mammograms using direction analysis of linear structures.

Authors:  T Matsubara; A Ito; A Tsunomori; T Hara; C Muramatsu; T Endo; H Fujita
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2015-08

4.  A pilot study of architectural distortion detection in mammograms based on characteristics of line shadows.

Authors:  Mitsutaka Nemoto; Soshi Honmura; Akinobu Shimizu; Daisuke Furukawa; Hidefumi Kobatake; Shigeru Nawano
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization image processing to improve the detection of simulated spiculations in dense mammograms.

Authors:  E D Pisano; S Zong; B M Hemminger; M DeLuca; R E Johnston; K Muller; M P Braeuning; S M Pizer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Characterization of Architectural Distortion in Mammograms Based on Texture Analysis Using Support Vector Machine Classifier with Clinical Evaluation.

Authors:  Amit Kamra; V K Jain; Sukhwinder Singh; Sunil Mittal
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 7.  Needs assessment for next generation computer-aided mammography reference image databases and evaluation studies.

Authors:  Alexander Horsch; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Matthias Elter
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms.

Authors:  Shantanu Banik; Rangaraj M Rangayyan; J E Leo Desautels
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Computer-aided detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms of interval cancer.

Authors:  Rangaraj M Rangayyan; Shantanu Banik; J E Leo Desautels
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography.

Authors:  R E Bird; T W Wallace; B C Yankaskas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  4 in total

1.  Breast Cancer Prediction Empowered with Fine-Tuning.

Authors:  Muhammad Umar Nasir; Taher M Ghazal; Muhammad Adnan Khan; Muhammad Zubair; Atta-Ur Rahman; Rashad Ahmed; Hussam Al Hamadi; Chan Yeob Yeun
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-09

2.  Spatially localized sparse representations for breast lesion characterization.

Authors:  Keni Zheng; Chelsea Harris; Predrag Bakic; Sokratis Makrogiannis
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 4.589

3.  Discriminative Localized Sparse Approximations for Mass Characterization in Mammograms.

Authors:  Sokratis Makrogiannis; Keni Zheng; Chelsea Harris
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Evaluation of the Combination of Artificial Intelligence and Radiologist Assessments to Interpret Malignant Architectural Distortion on Mammography.

Authors:  Yun Wan; Yunfei Tong; Yuanyuan Liu; Yan Huang; Guoyan Yao; Daniel Q Chen; Bo Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 5.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.