Literature DB >> 20023324

A method for measuring the energy spectrum of coincidence events in positron emission tomography.

Andrew L Goertzen1, David B Stout, Christopher J Thompson.   

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) system energy response is typically characterized in singles detection mode, yet there are situations in which the energy spectrum of coincidence events might be different than the spectrum measured in singles mode. Examples include imaging with isotopes that emit a prompt gamma in coincidence with a positron emission, imaging with low activity in a LSO/LYSO-based cameras, in which the intrinsic activity is significant, and in high scatter situations where the two 511 keV photons have different scattering probabilities (i.e. off-center line source). The ability to accurately measure the energy spectrum of coincidence events could be used for validating simulation models, optimizing energy discriminator levels and examining scatter models and corrections. For many PET systems operating in coincidence mode, the only method available for estimating the energy spectrum is to step the lower and upper level discriminators (LLD and ULD). Simple measurement techniques such as using a narrow sliding energy window or stepping only the LLD will not yield a spectrum of coincidence events that is accurate for cases where there are different energy components contributing to the spectrum. In this work we propose a new method of measuring the energy spectrum of coincidence events in PET based on a linear combination of two sets of coincident count measurements: one made by stepping the LLD and one made by stepping the ULD. The method was tested using both Monte Carlo simulations of a Siemens microPET R4 camera and measured data acquired on a Siemens Inveon PET camera. The results show that our energy spectrum calculation method accurately measures the coincident energy spectra for cases including the beta/gamma spectrum of the (176)Lu intrinsic activity present in the LSO scintillator crystals, a (68)Ge source and an (124)I source (in which there are prompt gamma-rays emitted together with the positron).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20023324      PMCID: PMC3000828          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/2/013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  9 in total

1.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT.

Authors:  S Jan; G Santin; D Strul; S Staelens; K Assié; D Autret; S Avner; R Barbier; M Bardiès; P M Bloomfield; D Brasse; V Breton; P Bruyndonckx; I Buvat; A F Chatziioannou; Y Choi; Y H Chung; C Comtat; D Donnarieix; L Ferrer; S J Glick; C J Groiselle; D Guez; P F Honore; S Kerhoas-Cavata; A S Kirov; V Kohli; M Koole; M Krieguer; D J van der Laan; F Lamare; G Largeron; C Lartizien; D Lazaro; M C Maas; L Maigne; F Mayet; F Melot; C Merheb; E Pennacchio; J Perez; U Pietrzyk; F R Rannou; M Rey; D R Schaart; C R Schmidtlein; L Simon; T Y Song; J M Vieira; D Visvikis; R Van de Walle; E Wieërs; C Morel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Investigation of single, random, and true counts from natural radioactivity in LSO-based clinical PET.

Authors:  Seiichi Yamamoto; Hitoshi Horii; Mitsuru Hurutani; Keiichi Matsumoto; Michio Senda
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.668

3.  PET energy-based scatter estimation and image reconstruction with energy-dependent corrections.

Authors:  Lucreţiu M Popescu; Robert M Lewitt; Samuel Matej; Joel S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Spatial resolution and sensitivity of the Inveon small-animal PET scanner.

Authors:  Eric P Visser; Jonathan A Disselhorst; Maarten Brom; Peter Laverman; Martin Gotthardt; Wim J G Oyen; Otto C Boerman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Treatment of axial data in three-dimensional PET.

Authors:  M E Daube-Witherspoon; G Muehllehner
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Imaging of weak-source distributions in LSO-based small-animal PET scanners.

Authors:  Andrew L Goertzen; Joon Young Suk; Christopher J Thompson
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Performance evaluation of the microPET R4 PET scanner for rodents.

Authors:  Christof Knoess; Stefan Siegel; Anne Smith; Danny Newport; Norbert Richerzhagen; Alexandra Winkeler; Andreas Jacobs; Rhonda N Goble; Rudolf Graf; Klaus Wienhard; Wolf-Dieter Heiss
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Performance evaluation of the inveon dedicated PET preclinical tomograph based on the NEMA NU-4 standards.

Authors:  Qinan Bao; Danny Newport; Mu Chen; David B Stout; Arion F Chatziioannou
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  NEMA NU 2-2007 performance measurements of the Siemens Inveon preclinical small animal PET system.

Authors:  Brad J Kemp; Carrie B Hruska; Aaron R McFarland; Mark W Lenox; Val J Lowe
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.609

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  NEMA NU-4 performance evaluation of PETbox4, a high sensitivity dedicated PET preclinical tomograph.

Authors:  Z Gu; R Taschereau; N T Vu; H Wang; D L Prout; R W Silverman; B Bai; D B Stout; M E Phelps; A F Chatziioannou
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Coincidence energy spectra due to the intrinsic radioactivity of LYSO scintillation crystals.

Authors:  Francisco Eduardo Enríquez-Mier-Y-Terán; Ana Saret Ortega-Galindo; Tirso Murrieta-Rodríguez; Mercedes Rodríguez-Villafuerte; Arnulfo Martínez-Dávalos; Héctor Alva-Sánchez
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2020-04-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.