RATIONALE: Individual differences in impulsive decision-making may be critical determinants of vulnerability to impulse control disorders and substance abuse, yet little is known of their biological or behavioural basis. The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) has been heavily implicated in the regulation of impulsive decision-making. However, lesions of the OFC in rats have both increased and decreased impulsivity in delay-discounting paradigms, where impulsive choice is defined as the selection of small immediate over larger delayed rewards. OBJECTIVES: Reviewing the different methods used, we hypothesized that the effects of OFC inactivation on delay discounting may be critically affected by both subjects' baseline level of impulsive choice and the presence or absence of a cue to bridge the delay between selection and delivery of the large reward. RESULTS: Here, we show that OFC inactivation increased impulsive choice in less impulsive rats when the delay was cued, but decreased impulsive choice in highly impulsive rats in an uncued condition. CONCLUSIONS: Providing explicit environmental cues to signal the delay-to-reinforcement appears to change the way in which the OFC is recruited in the decision-making process in a baseline-dependent fashion. This change may reflect activation of the dopamine system, as intra-OFC infusions of dopamine receptor antagonists increased impulsive choice but only when the delay was cued.
RATIONALE: Individual differences in impulsive decision-making may be critical determinants of vulnerability to impulse control disorders and substance abuse, yet little is known of their biological or behavioural basis. The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) has been heavily implicated in the regulation of impulsive decision-making. However, lesions of the OFC in rats have both increased and decreased impulsivity in delay-discounting paradigms, where impulsive choice is defined as the selection of small immediate over larger delayed rewards. OBJECTIVES: Reviewing the different methods used, we hypothesized that the effects of OFC inactivation on delay discounting may be critically affected by both subjects' baseline level of impulsive choice and the presence or absence of a cue to bridge the delay between selection and delivery of the large reward. RESULTS: Here, we show that OFC inactivation increased impulsive choice in less impulsive rats when the delay was cued, but decreased impulsive choice in highly impulsive rats in an uncued condition. CONCLUSIONS: Providing explicit environmental cues to signal the delay-to-reinforcement appears to change the way in which the OFC is recruited in the decision-making process in a baseline-dependent fashion. This change may reflect activation of the dopamine system, as intra-OFC infusions of dopamine receptor antagonists increased impulsive choice but only when the delay was cued.
Authors: S Mobini; S Body; M-Y Ho; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi; J F W Deakin; I M Anderson Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2002-01-25 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Annette E Fleckenstein; Trent J Volz; Evan L Riddle; James W Gibb; Glen R Hanson Journal: Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol Date: 2007 Impact factor: 13.820
Authors: Catharine A Winstanley; David E H Theobald; Jeffrey W Dalley; Rudolf N Cardinal; Trevor W Robbins Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2005-04-13 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Laura-Jean G Stokes; Anna Davies; Paul Lattimore; Catharine Winstanley; Robert D Rogers Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2019-02-18 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Kalen Petersen; Nelleke Van Wouwe; Adam Stark; Ya-Chen Lin; Hakmook Kang; Paula Trujillo-Diaz; Robert Kessler; David Zald; Manus J Donahue; Daniel O Claassen Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2017-10-31 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Fiona D Zeeb; P J J Baarendse; L J M J Vanderschuren; Catharine A Winstanley Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2015-09-21 Impact factor: 4.530