Literature DB >> 2299286

Timeout from concurrent schedules.

R Dunn1.   

Abstract

Response-contingent timeouts of equal duration and frequency were added to both alternatives of unequal concurrent schedules of reinforcement. For each of 4 pigeons in Experiment 1, relative response rates generally became less extreme as the frequency of timeout increased. In Experiment 2, relative response rates consistently approached indifference as the duration of timeout was increased. Variation in time allocation was less consistent in both experiments. Absolute response rates did not vary with the timeout contingency in either experiment. In a third experiment, neither measure of choice varied systematically when the duration of a postreinforcement blackout was varied. In contrast to the present results, preference has been shown to vary directly with the parameters of shock delivery in related procedures. The pattern of results in the first two experiments follows that obtained with other manipulations of the overall rate of reinforcement in concurrent schedules. The results of the third experiment suggest that an intertrial interval following reinforcement is not a critical feature of the overall rate of reinforcement.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2299286      PMCID: PMC1323032          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  21 in total

1.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Toward a quantitative theory of punishment.

Authors:  P A de Villiers
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Preference for intermittent reinforcement.

Authors:  S B Kendall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Observing responses and informative stimuli.

Authors:  R N Wilton; R O Clements
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Reinforcement and punishment effects in concurrent schedules: A test of two models.

Authors:  J Farley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Undermatching and overmatching: The fixed-ratio changeover requirement.

Authors:  S S Pliskoff; J G Fetterman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Concurrent-chain performance: Effects of absolute and relative terminal-link entry frequency.

Authors:  B Alsop; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Concurrent-schedule performance: Effects of relative and overall reinforcer rate.

Authors:  B Alsop; D Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Choice and the relative immediacy of reinforcement.

Authors:  R Dunn; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 10.  Is time-out from positive reinforcement an aversive event? A review of the experimental evidence.

Authors:  H Leitenberg
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  7 in total

1.  Conjoint schedules of timeout deletion in pigeons.

Authors:  T D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Preference for conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  B A Williams; R Dunn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Stimulus control and response bias in an analogue prey-detection procedure.

Authors:  P Voss; D McCarthy; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Do conditional reinforcers count?

Authors:  Michael Davison; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Human symbolic matching-to-sample performance: Effects of reinforcer and sample-stimulus probabilities.

Authors:  B Alsop; R Rowley; C Fon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Context effects on choice.

Authors:  J N Goldshmidt; K M Lattal; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Choice with uncertain outcomes: conditioned reinforcement effects.

Authors:  R Dunn; M L Spetch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.