Literature DB >> 4020322

Probability and delay of reinforcement as factors in discrete-trial choice.

J E Mazur.   

Abstract

Pigeons chose between two alternatives that differed in the probability of reinforcement and the delay to reinforcement. A peck on the red key always produced a delay of 5 s and then a possible reinforcer. The probability of reinforcement for responding on this key varied from .05 to 1.0 in different conditions. A response on the green key produced a delay of adjustable duration and then a possible reinforcer, with the probability of reinforcement ranging from .25 to 1.0 in different conditions. The green-key delay was increased or decreased many times per session, depending on a subject's previous choices. The purpose of these adjustments was to estimate an indifference point, or a delay that resulted in a subject's choosing each alternative about equally often. In conditions where the probability of reinforcement was five times higher on the green key, the green-key delay averaged about 12 s at the indifference point. In conditions where the probability of reinforcement was twice as high on the green key, the green-key delay at the indifference point was about 8 s with high probabilities and about 6 s with low probabilities. An analysis based on these results and those from studies on delay of reinforcement suggests that pigeons' choices are relatively insensitive to variations in the probability of reinforcement between .2 and 1.0, but quite sensitive to variations in probability between .2 and 0.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4020322      PMCID: PMC1348147          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  15 in total

1.  FURTHER EXPERIMENTS ON PROBABILITY-MATCHING IN THE PIGEON.

Authors:  V GRAF; D H BULLOCK; M E BITTERMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  DECISION MAKING BY RATS: UNCERTAIN OUTCOME CHOICES.

Authors:  F A LOGAN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1965-04

3.  The relation between mean reward and mean reinforcement.

Authors:  A M LEVENTHAL; R F MORRELL; E F MORGAN; C C PERKINS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-05

4.  Some comparative psychology.

Authors:  M E BITTERMAN; J WODINSKY; D K CANDLAND
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1958-03

5.  Preference for and effects of variable-as opposed to fixed-reinforcer duration.

Authors:  S M Essock; E P Reese
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Discrete-trial choice in pigeons: Effects of reinforcer magnitude.

Authors:  J S Young
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Fixed-interval behavior: effects of percentage reinforcement.

Authors:  M D Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Preference for intermittent reinforcement.

Authors:  S B Kendall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Commitment, choice and self-control.

Authors:  H Rachlin; L Green
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Reinforcement of least-frequent sequences of choices.

Authors:  C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  14 in total

1.  Choice with probabilistic reinforcement: effects of delay and conditioned reinforcers.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Preference for conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  B A Williams; R Dunn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Sensitivity to reinforcer duration in a self-control procedure.

Authors:  K G White; M E Pipe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice between delayed reinforcers and fixed-ratio schedules requiring forceful responding.

Authors:  J E Mazur; J D Kralik
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Response acquisition by Siamese fighting fish (Betta splendens) with delayed visual reinforcement.

Authors:  K A Lattal; B Metzger
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choice with certain and uncertain reinforcers in an adjusting-delay procedure.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Estimation of indifference points with an adjusting-delay procedure.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Choice with uncertain outcomes: conditioned reinforcement effects.

Authors:  R Dunn; M L Spetch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Theories of probabilistic reinforcement.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 10.  Experimental reductions of delay discounting and impulsive choice: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jillian M Rung; Gregory J Madden
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.