Literature DB >> 20514166

Some effects of procedural variations on choice responding in concurrent chains.

J Moore1.   

Abstract

The present research used pigeons in a three-key operant chamber and varied procedural features pertaining to both initial and terminal links of concurrent chains. The initial links randomly alternated on the side keys during a session, while the terminal links always appeared on the center key. Both equal and unequal initial-link schedules were employed, with either differential or nondifferential terminal-link stimuli across conditions. The research was designed to neutralize initial- and terminal-link spatial cues in order to gain a clearer understanding of the roles of conditioned reinforcement and delayed primary reinforcement in choice. With both equal and unequal initial links and with differential terminal-link stimuli, all pigeons reliably preferred the chain with the shorter terminal link. However, with equal initial links and nondifferential stimuli, all pigeons were indifferent. With unequal initial links and nondifferential stimuli, some pigeons were also indifferent, while others actually reversed and preferred the chain with the shorter initial link, even though it was followed by the longer terminal link. The decrease if not reversal of the previous preferences implies that preferences in concurrent chains are a function of the conditioned reinforcement afforded by terminal-link stimuli, rather than delayed primary reinforcement.

Keywords:  choice; concurrent chains; conditioned reinforcement; delay of reinforcement; key peck; pigeons

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20514166      PMCID: PMC2771668          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2009.92-345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  10 in total

1.  Preference for conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  B A Williams; R Dunn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Choice and delay of reinforcement: Effects of terminal-link stimulus and response conditions.

Authors:  T Omino; M Ito
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice and rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Independence of reinforcement delay and magnitude in concurrent chains.

Authors:  R C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Effects on choice of reinforcement delay and conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  B A Williams; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Differences in delay, not ratios, control choice in concurrent chains.

Authors:  H Savastano; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Cued and uncued terminal links in concurrent-chains schedules.

Authors:  B Alsop; K E Stewart; W K Honig
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Rapid determinations of preference in multiple concurrent-chain schedules.

Authors:  D T Cerutti; A C Catania
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  A quantitative analysis of sensitivity to the conditioned reinforcing value of terminal-link stimuli in a concurrent-chains schedule.

Authors:  T Omino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Getting it right: a reply to baum.

Authors:  J Moore
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2010
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.