Literature DB >> 19961835

Brainstem pitch representation in native speakers of Mandarin is less susceptible to degradation of stimulus temporal regularity.

Ananthanarayan Krishnan1, Jackson T Gandour, Gavin M Bidelman.   

Abstract

It has been demonstrated that neural encoding of pitch in the auditory brainstem is shaped by long-term experience with language. To date, however, all stimuli have exhibited a high degree of pitch saliency. The experimental design herein permits us to determine whether experience-dependent pitch representation in the brainstem is less susceptible to progressive degradation of the temporal regularity of iterated rippled noise (IRN). Brainstem responses were recorded from Chinese and English participants in response to IRN homologues of Mandarin Tone 2 (T2(IRN)). Six different iterations steps were utilized to systematically vary the degree of temporal regularity in the fine structure of the IRN stimuli to produce a pitch salience continuum ranging from low to high. Pitch-tracking accuracy and pitch strength were computed from the brainstem responses using autocorrelation algorithms. Analysis of variance of brainstem responses to T2(IRN) revealed that pitch-tracking accuracy is higher in the native tone language group (Chinese) relative to the non-tone language group (English) except for the three lowest steps along the continuum, and moreover, that pitch strength is greater in the Chinese group even in severely degraded stimuli for two of the six 40-ms sections of T2(IRN) that exhibit rapid changes in pitch. For these same two sections, exponential time constants for the stimulus continuum revealed that pitch strength emerges 2-3 times faster in the tone language than in the non-tone language group as a function of increasing pitch salience. These findings altogether suggest that experience-dependent brainstem mechanisms for pitch are especially sensitive to those dimensions of tonal contours that provide cues of high perceptual saliency in degraded as well as normal listening conditions. Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19961835      PMCID: PMC2838171          DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.11.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  52 in total

1.  The corticofugal system for hearing: recent progress.

Authors:  N Suga; E Gao; Y Zhang; X Ma; J F Olsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Encoding of the temporal regularity of sound in the human brainstem.

Authors:  T D Griffiths; S Uppenkamp; I Johnsrude; O Josephs; R D Patterson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center in Heschl's gyrus.

Authors:  K Krumbholz; R D Patterson; A Seither-Preisler; C Lammertmann; B Lütkenhöner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Applications of static and dynamic iterated rippled noise to evaluate pitch encoding in the human auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Yisheng Xu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  The linguistic benefits of musical abilities.

Authors:  Aniruddh D Patel; John R Iversen
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Differential brainstem pathways for the conduction of auditory frequency-following responses.

Authors:  J T Marsh; W S Brown; J C Smith
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1974-04

7.  The human frequency-following response: its behavior during continuous tone and tone burst stimulation.

Authors:  E M Glaser; C M Suter; R Dasheiff; A Goldberg
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-01

8.  Pitch encoding in speech and nonspeech contexts in the human auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  Experience-dependent neural representation of dynamic pitch in the brainstem.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Gavin M Bidelman; Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 1.837

10.  Neuroplasticity in the processing of pitch dimensions: a multidimensional scaling analysis of the mismatch negativity.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Jackson T Gandour; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.406

View more
  17 in total

1.  LANGUAGE EXPERIENCE SHAPES PROCESSING OF PITCH RELEVANT INFORMATION IN THE HUMAN BRAINSTEM AND AUDITORY CORTEX: ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Acoust Aust       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.500

2.  Language-experience plasticity in neural representation of changes in pitch salience.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Chandan H Suresh
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Training to improve hearing speech in noise: biological mechanisms.

Authors:  Judy H Song; Erika Skoe; Karen Banai; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Tone language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in brainstem and auditory cortex is maintained under reverberation.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Human frequency following responses to iterated rippled noise with positive and negative gain: Differential sensitivity to waveform envelope and temporal fine-structure.

Authors:  Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Perception of speech in noise: neural correlates.

Authors:  Judy H Song; Erika Skoe; Karen Banai; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Language-dependent pitch encoding advantage in the brainstem is not limited to acceleration rates that occur in natural speech.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Christopher J Smalt; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Functional ear (a)symmetry in brainstem neural activity relevant to encoding of voice pitch: a precursor for hemispheric specialization?

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Gavin M Bidelman; Christopher J Smalt
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Experience-dependent enhancement of pitch-specific responses in the auditory cortex is limited to acceleration rates in normal voice range.

Authors:  A Krishnan; J T Gandour; C H Suresh
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Distortion products and their influence on representation of pitch-relevant information in the human brainstem for unresolved harmonic complex tones.

Authors:  Christopher J Smalt; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Gavin M Bidelman; Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.