Literature DB >> 20681749

Perception of speech in noise: neural correlates.

Judy H Song1, Erika Skoe, Karen Banai, Nina Kraus.   

Abstract

The presence of irrelevant auditory information (other talkers, environmental noises) presents a major challenge to listening to speech. The fundamental frequency (F(0)) of the target speaker is thought to provide an important cue for the extraction of the speaker's voice from background noise, but little is known about the relationship between speech-in-noise (SIN) perceptual ability and neural encoding of the F(0). Motivated by recent findings that music and language experience enhance brainstem representation of sound, we examined the hypothesis that brainstem encoding of the F(0) is diminished to a greater degree by background noise in people with poorer perceptual abilities in noise. To this end, we measured speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses to /da/ in quiet and two multitalker babble conditions (two-talker and six-talker) in native English-speaking young adults who ranged in their ability to perceive and recall SIN. Listeners who were poorer performers on a standardized SIN measure demonstrated greater susceptibility to the degradative effects of noise on the neural encoding of the F(0). Particularly diminished was their phase-locked activity to the fundamental frequency in the portion of the syllable known to be most vulnerable to perceptual disruption (i.e., the formant transition period). Our findings suggest that the subcortical representation of the F(0) in noise contributes to the perception of speech in noisy conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20681749      PMCID: PMC3253852          DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  77 in total

1.  Cortical mechanisms of speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Patrick C M Wong; Ajith K Uppunda; Todd B Parrish; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Corticofugal modulation of initial sound processing in the brain.

Authors:  Feng Luo; Qianzhou Wang; Alireza Kashani; Jun Yan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Envelope and spectral frequency-following responses to vowel sounds.

Authors:  Steven J Aiken; Terence W Picton
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1986-03

5.  Masking produced by spectral uncertainty with multicomponent maskers.

Authors:  D L Neff; D M Green
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-05

6.  Cochlear distribution of frequency-following response initiation. A high-pass masking noise study.

Authors:  O Yamada; K Kodera; R F Hink; J I Suzuki
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1979

7.  Brainstem encoding of voiced consonant--vowel stop syllables.

Authors:  Krista L Johnson; Trent Nicol; Steven G Zecker; Ann R Bradlow; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Plasticity in the adult human auditory brainstem following short-term linguistic training.

Authors:  Judy H Song; Erika Skoe; Patrick C M Wong; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 9.  Selective attention in normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Virginia Best
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-10-30

10.  Deficient brainstem encoding of pitch in children with Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Authors:  N M Russo; E Skoe; B Trommer; T Nicol; S Zecker; A Bradlow; N Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 3.708

View more
  65 in total

1.  Cross-phaseogram: objective neural index of speech sound differentiation.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Subcortical encoding of sound is enhanced in bilinguals and relates to executive function advantages.

Authors:  Jennifer Krizman; Viorica Marian; Anthony Shook; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Why middle-aged listeners have trouble hearing in everyday settings.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  The neural encoding of formant frequencies contributing to vowel identification in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Kelly Tremblay; Christopher G Clinard; Richard A Wright; Elad Sagi; Mario Svirsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A comparison of spectral magnitude and phase-locking value analyses of the frequency-following response to complex tones.

Authors:  Li Zhu; Hari Bharadwaj; Jing Xia; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Training to improve hearing speech in noise: biological mechanisms.

Authors:  Judy H Song; Erika Skoe; Karen Banai; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Functional Interplay Between the Putative Measures of Rostral and Caudal Efferent Regulation of Speech Perception in Noise.

Authors:  Sandeep Maruthy; U Ajith Kumar; G Nike Gnanateja
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-26

8.  Playing Music for a Smarter Ear: Cognitive, Perceptual and Neurobiological Evidence.

Authors:  Dana Strait; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Music Percept       Date:  2011-12-01

9.  Afferent-efferent connectivity between auditory brainstem and cortex accounts for poorer speech-in-noise comprehension in older adults.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Caitlin N Price; Dawei Shen; Stephen R Arnott; Claude Alain
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene modulates the influence of informational masking on speech recognition.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; W Todd Maddox; Valerie S Knopik; John E McGeary; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.