Literature DB >> 21218901

Interaural fluctuations and the detection of interaural incoherence. IV. The effect of compression on stimulus statistics.

Matthew J Goupell1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this experiment was to determine whether the normalized interaural cross-correlation (CC) model or a model based on interaural phase and level differences can better describe incoherence detection data. The ability to detect interaural incoherence in three sets of reproducible dichotic noises was tested in six listeners. The first set contained noises with a constrained value of the CC and the CC including signal compression. The second set contained noises with a constrained value of the CC including signal compression. The third set contained noises with constrained values in the fluctuations in the interaural differences. Modeling showed that neither the CC model nor the model using the interaural differences could account for the data in any set. Examination of the statistical properties of the stimuli showed that including compression before the calculation of the interaural CC causes a substantial correlation of this metric to the fluctuations in the interaural phase difference. This finding implies that it may be more difficult to discriminate between the common types of binaural models than previously thought.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21218901      PMCID: PMC3037772          DOI: 10.1121/1.3505104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  27 in total

1.  The normalized interaural correlation: accounting for NoS pi thresholds obtained with Gaussian and "low-noise" masking noise.

Authors:  L R Bernstein; S van de Par; C Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Detection of tones in reproducible narrow-band noise.

Authors:  S K Isabelle; H S Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Source localization in complex listening situations: selection of binaural cues based on interaural coherence.

Authors:  Christof Faller; Juha Merimaa
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Interaural fluctuations and the detection of interaural incoherence: bandwidth effects.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; William M Hartmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Temporal integration and multiple looks.

Authors:  N F Viemeister; G H Wakefield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Additivity of masking in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.

Authors:  A J Oxenham; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Diotic and dichotic detection using multiplied-noise maskers.

Authors:  S van de Par; A Kohlrausch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The normalized correlation: accounting for binaural detection across center frequency.

Authors:  L R Bernstein; C Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Performance in several binaural-interaction experiments.

Authors:  J Koehnke; H S Colburn; N I Durlach
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Contributions of intrinsic neural and stimulus variance to binaural sensitivity.

Authors:  Trevor M Shackleton; Alan R Palmer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-10-12
View more
  6 in total

1.  Untrained listeners experience difficulty detecting interaural correlation changes in narrowband noises.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Mary E Barrett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The effect of interaural fluctuation rate on correlation change discrimination.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-21

3.  Sensitivity to interaural envelope correlation changes in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Interaural envelope correlation change discrimination in bilateral cochlear implantees: effects of mismatch, centering, and onset of deafness.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The role of envelope statistics in detecting changes in interaural correlation.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Corey A Stoelb; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.