Literature DB >> 11911394

On the form of ROCs constructed from confidence ratings.

Kenneth J Malmberg1.   

Abstract

A classical question for memory researchers is whether memories vary in an all-or-nothing, discrete manner (e.g., stored vs. not stored, recalled vs. not recalled), or whether they vary along a continuous dimension (e.g., strength, similarity, or familiarity). For yes-no classification tasks, continuous- and discrete-state models predict nonlinear and linear receiver operating characteristics (ROCs), respectively (D. M. Green & J. A. Swets, 1966; N. A. Macmillan & C. D. Creelman, 1991). Recently, several authors have assumed that these predictions are generalizable to confidence ratings tasks (J. Qin, C. L. Raye, M. K. Johnson, & K. J. Mitchell, 2001; S. D. Slotnick, S. A. Klein, C. S. Dodson, & A. P. Shimamura, 2000, and A. P. Yonelinas, 1999). This assumption is shown to be unwarranted by showing that discrete-state ratings models predict both linear and nonlinear ROCs. The critical factor determining the form of the discrete-state ROC is the response strategy adopted by the classifier.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11911394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  29 in total

1.  Toward a complete decision model of item and source recognition: A discrete-state approach.

Authors:  Karl Christoph Klauer; David Kellen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-08

2.  Strong memories obscure weak memories in associative recognition.

Authors:  Michael F Verde; Caren M Rotello
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12

3.  Pairs do not suffer interference from other types of pairs or single items in associative recognition.

Authors:  Amy H Criss; Richard M Shiffrin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-12

4.  Aging selectively impairs recollection in recognition memory for pictures: evidence from modeling and receiver operating characteristic curves.

Authors:  Marc W Howard; Brandy Bessette-Symons; Yaofei Zhang; William J Hoyer
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2006-03

5.  The influence of averaging and noisy decision strategies on the recognition memory ROC.

Authors:  Kenneth J Malmberg; Jing Xu
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

6.  Interpreting the effects of response bias on remember-know judgments using signal detection and threshold models.

Authors:  Caren M Rotello; Neil A Macmillan; Jason L Hicks; Michael J Hautus
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-12

7.  Discriminating between changes in bias and changes in accuracy for recognition memory of emotional stimuli.

Authors:  Rebecca C Grider; Kenneth J Malmberg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-07

8.  Decision noise: an explanation for observed violations of signal detection theory.

Authors:  Shane T Mueller; Christoph T Weidemann
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-06

9.  Strength-based criterion shifts in recognition memory.

Authors:  Murray Singer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-10

10.  Criterion noise in ratings-based recognition: evidence from the effects of response scale length on recognition accuracy.

Authors:  Aaron S Benjamin; Jonathan G Tullis; Ji Hae Lee
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.