Literature DB >> 19636531

[Navigation in hip joint revision endoprosthetics].

P A Grützner1.   

Abstract

The exact anatomical and biomechanical demands of correct positioning of prostheses can be critical for hip joint revision endoprosthetics. Preoperative planning cannot always be implemented due to the intraoperative situation. The reconstruction of the hip center, the correct alignment of the acetabulum and the shaft is difficult, especially in large defect situations. An exact positioning of the implant is possible for primary hip joint replacement by computer-assisted procedures. Although the potential benefits of revision endoprosthetics make sense, there are as yet only few publications which as a rule are limited to positioning of the acetabulum. It will be possible to further optimize revision endoprosthetics by analysis of the impingement, determination of alterations in leg length, measurement of shaft antetorsion and other parameters, by additionally incorporating shaft navigation and implant data. Navigation should, however, only be understood as an aid to orientation and does not supplant lack of knowledge and experience on the side of the operator. Information on positioning of the implant must therefore come from the operator.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19636531     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-009-1433-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  23 in total

1.  The effect of acetabular cup orientations on limiting hip rotation.

Authors:  F J Kummer; S Shah; S Iyer; P E DiCesare
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Activity-dependence of the "safe zone" for impingement versus dislocation avoidance.

Authors:  D R Pedersen; J J Callaghan; T D Brown
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 2.242

3.  Radiographic calculation of anteversion in acetabular prostheses.

Authors:  D M Hassan; G H Johnston; W N Dust; L G Watson; D Cassidy
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Accuracy of intraoperative assessment of acetabular prosthesis placement.

Authors:  D M Hassan; G H Johnston; W N Dust; G Watson; A T Dolovich
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation.

Authors:  D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-03

6.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  G E Lewinnek; J L Lewis; R Tarr; C L Compere; J R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention.

Authors:  D E McCollum; W J Gray
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer-aided design simulation.

Authors:  M Seki; N Yuasa; K Ohkuni
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  The accuracy of free-hand cup positioning--a CT based measurement of cup placement in 105 total hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  G Saxler; A Marx; D Vandevelde; U Langlotz; M Tannast; M Wiese; U Michaelis; G Kemper; P A Grützner; R Steffen; M von Knoch; T Holland-Letz; K Bernsmann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  The frontal pelvic plane provides a valid reference system for implantation of the acetabular cup: spatial orientation of the pelvis in different positions.

Authors:  Eckart Mayr; Oliver Kessler; Alexandra Prassl; Franz Rachbauer; Martin Krismer; Michael Nogler
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.