Literature DB >> 9747795

Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer-aided design simulation.

M Seki1, N Yuasa, K Ohkuni.   

Abstract

A three-dimensional computer-aided design model of a total hip replacement was used to study the effects of anteversion and abduction of the acetabular component and anteversion and varus-valgus angulation of the femoral component on the range of hip flexion and extension that could be obtained without component impingement. Impingement of the component was defined as impingement between the neck of the femoral component and the edge of the acetabular component. To achieve an angle of hip flexion greater than 90 degrees and an extension angle greater than 30 degrees without component impingement, the optimal angulations were found to be between 1 and 30 degrees of anteversion and 30 and 50 degrees of abduction of the acetabular component, as well as 10 degrees of anteversion of the femoral component. When the valgus angulation of the femoral component was reduced from 7 to 0 degrees, the allowable range of flexion without impingement increased under the same conditions of acetabular-component orientation and femoral-component anteversion. Significant inverse correlations were found between the anteversion angle of the acetabular component and both the lumbar lordosis angle and the sacrohorizontal angle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9747795     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100160418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  31 in total

1.  Hip-spine relationship: a radio-anatomical study for optimization in acetabular cup positioning.

Authors:  J-Y Lazennec; N Charlot; M Gorin; B Roger; N Arafati; A Bissery; G Saillant
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  [CT-free image guided acetabulum navigation in clinical routine].

Authors:  J Von Recum; K Wendl; J Korber; A Wentzensen; P A Grützner
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Acetabular component positioning using anatomic landmarks of the acetabulum.

Authors:  Yong-Chan Ha; Jeong Joon Yoo; Young-Kyun Lee; Jin Young Kim; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Development of imageless computer navigation for acetabular component position in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Lawrence D Dorr; Yuji Hishiki; Zhinian Wan; Deanne Newton; Andrew Yun
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2005

5.  Range of motion measurement of an artificial hip joint using CT images.

Authors:  Haosheng Sun; Hidenori Inaoka; Yutaka Fukuoka; Tadashi Masuda; Akimasa Ishida; Sadao Morita
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Six sigma analysis of minimally invasive acetabular arthroplasty: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  David A Heck; James B Stiehl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Motion performance and impingement risk of total hip arthroplasty with a simulation module.

Authors:  Hai Zhou; Cheng-tao Wang; Wen-ting Ji; Xiang-sen Zeng; Shu Fang; Dong-mei Wang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.066

8.  Modular necks improve the range of hip motion in cases with excessively anteverted or retroverted femurs in THA.

Authors:  Akinobu Matsushita; Yasuharu Nakashima; Masanori Fujii; Taishi Sato; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  [Navigation in hip joint revision endoprosthetics].

Authors:  P A Grützner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Bony impingement limits design-related increases in hip range of motion.

Authors:  Adam Bunn; Clifford W Colwell; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.